Jump to content

February 6-10, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

B&B's ratings are still holding strong right now as they haven't been this high consistently since like 2009 I believe and Y&R's numbers outside of Friday are staying consistent so the CBS soaps are still in really good shape.

GH is still in a transition period right now as Ron C.'s stuff still hasn't started officially just yet. I don't think you're going to see GH really settle in until later in the spring when it finds its footing under his direction.

The scary thing about GH right now is that its lead-in is super low and it has to gain close to a million viewers everytime just to get to respectability. I'm really surprised its actually been tying The Chew every week since The Revolution debut so it speaks volumes on how bad The Chew is doing right now with a better lead-in from affiliates. GH also has a decision coming up by ABC to kep it or cancel it so nervous times are coming.

DAYS overall as a show still is a little bit slow but there's some angles right now that have just started to become interesting like I want fans to keep an eye on the teens turning dark in Will and Abby. Abby really interests me b/c she is starting to turn in to a crazy character and Sami is back to being bad for the first time in years. This is probably the first time since the new regime where I've actually been this invested in tuning in everyday.

As for the constant 2013 predictions I think its too early for anybody to really speak on that as I'm sure the ABC daytime debacle has really got the other networks thinking twice about getting rid of their remaining soaps but DAYS is still cheap enough to continue as Sony has done a great job keeping the liscence fee down. It seems like anytime someone is ready to throw in the towel on DAYS they never think about these things. If DAYS was going to be cancelled due to ratings it would've happened 3-5 years ago already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not saying its immune but there's other factors that go into these decisions.

I agree LoveDays, soaps have been rehashing storylines for years and that's not really an overall problem the problem is the execution. I'm always entertained by storylines I see over and over again as long as its executed right. B&B's triangle is a definite rehash of Brooke/Rick/Taylor and I don't find B&B fans pointing that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I look at it more like a nuclear bomb. And the only beings that will survive a nuclear bomb are cockroaches, and of course, Cher.

AMC was vaporized.

OLTL was Cher, but even Cher would die without food!

and GH is the cockroaches.

The Chew and The Revolution are the radiation that will pollute what is left of the earth for all eternity.

Have a wonderful day everyone!

LOL!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope you didn't mean my "SB" answer to your post about recycling plots because I didn't intend it to be negative.

I'm a DAYS fan too and have been for 30 years now. While this regime isn't perfect, they aren't horrible either. At the very least, I do think the actors are having more adult, interesting conversations and I was enjoying the Stefano/Alice connection storyline (now I'm a little shaky on it). Either way, I'm sorry if you took my comment as being negative.

As for the ratings, it's hard to find them interesting enough to post about anymore since there's only 4 soaps and they all pretty much have their place. Hell, the most interesting thing that happens is a show hits another "ALL-TIME LOW" which isn't something I care to discuss, since the industry is dying right now and it's depressing enough as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^At the end of the day thats true and I apologize if my posts offended anyone. But lets be honest even with slight ratings improvements of B&B and Y&R and OLTL in its final 9 months, non of these shows are setting the world on fire.An uptic of .1 or .2 is not exactly astronomical and the networks all barely making profits today are businesses and are looking for cost effective programming not only during the day but during primetime.It still angers me that NBC cancelled a great show like Friday Night Light but find money for a mediocre Grimm which is performing about the same but obviously there were business reasons.So be it. But I have to admit the lambasting of GH's rating floudering due to its lead in bugged me, I guess unjustifiably on my part, but the show has really been on a downward spiral for months if not years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lead IN may have something to do with it but GH has been circling the drain for quite a few years its been at the bottom tier I'm not sure about the demos but I recall them being out of whack & many sweep storylines tanking on numerous occasions (for years) . GH "alienated" many viewers with lousy storytelling and Frons / Guza only allowing pay offs for their favs its the reason I rarely watch. I just know how their stories will play out (execution) no surprises. I'm anxious to see what the new regime will do for however long they'll be on. .... to see stories told in a different way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I like Margaret well enough in what I've seen of her as Paige - she is green but she has real star power.  I agree about the actor who plays Brian. He's...mostly just there. Not bad but not great.  My main issue is with the guy who plays Owen. He's just not appealing to me. I can believe Nola being obsessed with him, but he's draining to watch.  I'm surprised people objected to the quasi-incest elements as it wasn't anything that new for soaps.  Speaking of Kim, here's a rare episode of an anthology show she did called The Evil Touch.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    •   I get what you're both saying, and I think the show was lucky to have even made it that long, but I think they could have still maintained a certain audience - Second Chances did before the earthquake. CBS was an older network anyway. I think the premise of Knots was still usable, it was more the characters who were a problem - many of the older figures were played out. If the show had done a better job building up its younger cast instead of making so many poor choices in the late '80s and early '90s, they could have kept things going a little longer. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy