Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled! Part 2!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 912
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

First this...

And then this...

Finally summed up by this...

Actually, you have. You have inferred multiple times that if Susan Lucci had agreed to the venture more investors would have been interested. That is placing blame on Prospect Park's lack of investors on Susan Lucci. The very same Susan Lucci who released a detailed public statement, breaking down her communications with Prospect Park, communications that ceased, from Prospect Park's side, on September 8th.

Furthermore, Prospect Park DID release a statement that placed blame on the unions when it said "After five months of negotiations with various guilds...While we narrowed in on a financial infrastructure, the contractual demands of the guilds, which regulate our industry, coupled with the program’s inherent economic challenges ultimately led to this final decision." BULLSHIT they didn't place blame on the guilds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

John, do you have any info on these offers that ABC rejected because they all could have been weak offers, maybe ABC doesn't want to relinquish their rights. The fact that Andy Cohen of Bravo took a look at the budgets means nothing this is hollywood things like that happen all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I said Susan Lucci defintley having intrest in AMC through PP could help Get Investors I never said it would get investors

If U read PP's statement againit says because of economics and the contractts and Guilds it proved difficult. They gave equal weight to everything. They did not say The Unions were at 100% fault but they are partly to blame. They wanted the online versions to be on par with broadcast minimums which is 931.00 an episode. IMHO thats too much, the minimums needed to be lowered to see profit. So AFTRA said they would be willing to talk but talking without reaching middle grounds does nothing. Plus WGA said they were closer to a deal so PP must have been talking to them

I am friends with some soap bloggers who told me that ABC got offers from others with far more money & experience than PP has. That some wanted to do reboots. Some wanted 13 week arcs. All turned down by ABC

And as Hilary B Smith Tweeted when some asked was this fake/a ruse. She said No. ABC Picked this deal because it was the net

To clarify I dont believe in everything soap bloggers write but the ones that told me this I believe because their actions have shown me they have the sources to back this up

My source who is in the soap media told me ABC had offers from Companies with more money & experience than PP but they were turned down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is a damn shame, IMO. Unless these actors (not just from OLTL, but from AMC, AS THE WORLD TURNS and GUIDING LIGHT as well) no longer care to work, I'd love to see them again in just about anything (except porn, which would be sad and kind of gross).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the end of the day ABC wants these soaps gone. They are done and the death march will continue till each one is picked off until the last ones. Honestly IMO soaps can return someday but they will never return in this current form. This FORM is done forever. It makes ZERO FINANCIAL SENSE. ABC is happy the Chew keeps going up in viewers. Its only 100,000 behind AMC on a much cheaper budget. ABC just wants to improve their BOTTOM LINE and it sucks Frons gets the vindication but in the end we won't be vindicted it will be Sweeney/Frons who will spew out facts/numbers why cancelling soaps brought them DINERO to the network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxpFaAp_UY/ Roman vs. Stefano, Cliff top, Beach Below This is one of the most important scenes on DAYS in the 80s. After this nothing was ever the same. DAYS 11-23-84   @JAS0N47Closing Credits roll & it's complete silence. Isn't that unusual?
    • Mack was the show's moral compass and his groundedness complimented Karen's hysteria perfectly. Also, Kevin Dobson was the best looking male cast member with a huge fan base. He was never going to be killed off...
    • As others (I think) have said, Long just didn't get Nola and Quint. I guess it would've been hard to write them into adventure type stories with two kids, but they just fell off the map after AJ's birth. (or even the wedding/honeymoon) Long would've had to rewrite something, because Alex forced the Chamberlains out of Spaulding in the fall of '84. Not that she couldn't have just ignored it and written Quint and Henry being involved at the firm. I swear there was some plot point she just literally ignored that surprised me, but as I'm floating around between years, I can't recall what it was. lol Has anyone found the first day of the Kyle/Lewis dinner party up in English? After he took over Lewis Oil, Kyle arranged a dinner party. All hell breaks loose--Mindy admits to shooting Kyle, Vanessa remembers Reva's accident, and Billy and Reva get into a screaming match and she tells HB that Billy blackmailed her out of her Lewis shares. The last three minutes (or so) of the episode are up, where Kyle tells the assembled that HB's his father. And the next episode picks up with Sally entering the fray. Y'all know I'm dying to hear Billy and Reva go at it. As dicey as '85 is, I love it anytime when Billy isn't Reva's bitch.  
    • The original premise of "Santa Barbara" was that a Lockridge (Warren) killed a Capwell (Channing), who loved an Andrade (Santana), while a Perkins (Joe) went to jail for the crime. I think once the show started to pull away the threads by eliminating Joe and naming a new killer a lot of the show's original potential was lost. I contend, like others, that the fault lied in the uninspiring casting, which leads me to wonder if that's why the show became so keen on casting soap veterans for nearly every pivotal role.  The failure of the Perkins family was definitely a casting issue followed by a lack of interest in committing to the original onscreen characterization. I was fascinated watching the early episodes and realizing that the Perkins had been financially wiped out by the trial, which was an underlying current towards John's animosity towards his son. Then, the additional complication of Marissa's nearly incestual affection for Joe that led to her cutting off John sexually was a wild moment to witness, but not as strong as it could have been with a stronger actor in the role of John Perkins. Melissa Brennan wasn't the right choice for the aspiring young vixen that Jade was intended to be. Brennan may have breathed life into Laken, but I'm not sure how Julia Ronnie would have done in the role of Jade.  Despite the recorded history, Christina Robertson and Sarah Gallagher weren't sisters; they were aunt and niece.  I don't think it would have hurt to make Marissa and Augusta sisters, but I think it would have made the Joe / Augusta seduction impossible unless you truly mimick "Rituals" and make Joe Sarah's stepson. I think a childhood friendship between the two women would have worked. It would have also given Augusta someone to confide in about the situation involving Peter Flint and herself as Marissa would have been aware of Peter from her work at the pre school. As childhood friends that were estranged by class differences, I think a relationship between Augusta and Joe (and later Augusta and a sexually frustrated John) would have had multiple layers to play out giving a deeper impact on Augusta's involvement in both of the men in Marissa's life. And because I have thought about this all too much, I would have Augusta and Marissa square off again when Jade, after marrying Ted while pregnant, learned that the little Capwell heir was in fact an imprisoned Warren's son only for Augusta to ultimately keep mum because with Ted married to Jade he wasn't free to pursue Laken.  I imagine the Andrades would have slowly been withdrawn from the Capwell inner circle as the truth about Santana, Channing, Jr., and the baby came to light for everyone. In what I seen in the 1980s, Rosa confronts C.C. once about the baby and then seems to move on. Early in the run, the actor playing Reuben claims he and Bridget Dobson had a falling out and implied that she was racist which led to the character fading into the woodwork.  I know I am like maybe one of two people who liked the 1990s run of the Dobsons, but I loved the set up for Santana / C.C. with the Andrades having owned the land that Oasis sat on years earlier posing Santana to come into money while also potentially landing a position where she could raise Gina's son with C.C. if C.C. and Santana could have secured custody of the child. With Eden gone, I would have gone back to Santana and Cruz, but if not, I think Brick should have returned to be Santana's conscience and potential love interest.     
    • Well, I'm not going to shoot you, so no worries there. If it's subpar i hate hearing that. It was an old DVD not even mine a former partner. I thought why not make use of it. Serves me right for thinking. But to be clear, white label, www.radiomemory.com 
    • Just compared the open on Friday's episode with the first week episodes. I think the difference is that the bass line is much more apparent -- stronger and harder.
    • Phew, that was close to disaster!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I suspect we would have had a few withdrawals next year if Israel had won. I don't think many people would relish going to Jerusalem as things stand now. Not to mention it would have been a prime target for terrorist attacks.   
    • And they've given us plenty. Sets, outdoor scenes, music licensing, etc. And that was the point of me using DAYS... so. It's obvious the casino set is not intended for long-term use, hence why it's likely it wasn't as evolved as the other community sets, etc.
    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy