Jump to content

DAYS: From the Archives: Bill Bell discusses plans for 1970


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here's a treat for all the "Days" history fans: A letter from Bill Bell to Betty Corday detailing plans for the show in 1970. In the letter, Bill asks Betty if he can perhaps write a "mixed marriage/love affair" storyline. Although wanting to write the story in 1970, that would not happen on the show until Valerie Grant arrived in Salem in the fall of 1975. Also, there is the first-ever mention of Bill Horton's as-yet-unnamed cellmate (who would eventually become the long-running character of Doug Williams). Those are just a few of the tidbits in the 4-page letter. Enjoy!!

http://www.jason47.com/days/billbellletter.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Heather North played Sandy Horton from 67-72. However, her time on the show is barely referenced in synopses, so I have no clue if those stories occurred or not, unfortunately.

As for Craig, he never did return. And as we know, Marie was never paired with "Bill's cellmate."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Craig never returned after leaving the show in February 1967.

Sandy's chemistry teacher, Ruth Parker (played by Maura McGiveney), appeared for just a few episodes, so her romance with Tommy never happened.

Sandy never had too much to do, she wasn't a contract character, and based on her monthly episode appearances, she was never featured much more than once a week. They featured Sandy heavily from November 1969 to January 1970, but she pretty much disappeared after that. Here's Sandy's monthly totals:

Heather North (Sandy Horton)

12/67: 5

1/68: 1

4/68: 1

5/68: 4

6/68: 4

7/68: 9

8/68: 4

9/68: 2

10/68: 5

11/68: 8

12/68: 5

1/69: 11

2/69: 3

3/69: 5

4/69: 2

5/69: 5

6/69: 5

7/69: 6

8/69: 3

9/69: 5

10/69: 4

11/69: 9

12/69: 9

1/70: 10

2/70: 5

3/70: 2

5/70: 1

6/70: 3

8/70: 3

9/70: 3

10/70: 2

11/70: 2

12/70: 1

1/71: 1

4/71: 1

5/71: 1

12/71: 1

1/72: 1

5/72: 2

6/72: 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always liked Heather North, I thought she was very cute and a pretty good actress for her age. A coworker who was watching then has said the same thing. I've seen her in some old tv episodes from the same time period, and she was in a Disney movie with Kurt Russell around that time too. But Jason's right, Sandy never really had a story while she played the role. I think she was mainly getting acquainted with the Hortons since she had been raised away from them (since Tommy had been presumed dead through most of her childhood).

Oh, and Heather got a baby out of it too! I have an old magazine that has a story and photos about the christening of the son she & Wes Kenney had. Bill & Susan Hayes were the godparents, and Suzanne Rogers attended too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is interesting in comparing DAYS of the 60s/70s to the 80s/90s. Very different, yet they each had their very popular periods. It's too bad there wasn't more of an effort to include aspects from the 70s, apart from random returns. Mickey and Alice are gone. Marie is a non-entity (such a waste) and Bill has been a non-entity since 1994/1995, apart from a LOT of references. They could even resurrect Tommy, but I feel that time long passed. It's really a shame the Hortons aren't used as the anchors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fascinating insight.

i wonder how much control Bell had and how much Corday and NBC could influence story? eg the 'mixed marriage' story he proposed never came to pass.Was this Bell's decision or was pressure brought to bear?

Regards Marie,did Bell know for sure that Maree Cheatham was willing to return or was he prepared to recast? As it turned out Marie was used very little until dropped in 73.

Sandy was a wasted character (along with Steve).With a little tweaking,Sandy could have been the Marlena character which would have kept the Hortons front and center for many years.

Interesting that Bell commented on wanting to see character onscreen before creating story,which shows he was quite flexible about plot lines at some level.

Hopefully Jason has more treasures like this to share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill Bell's letter and now Betty Corday's response ... fascinating. (Thanks, Jason!) Two things I find particularly interesting about Corday's letter: She says that Julie "knows" she is more physically attractive than Susan. Do you think that's an indication of Julie's self-centeredness, or is it a reflection of Corday's (and presumably, the viewing public's) opinion that Susan Seaforth was more beautiful than Denise Alexander? (Personally, I think both women were -- and are -- gorgeous.) Also, Corday's contention that viewers won't be interested in the Marie-as-nun story due in part to a diminishment of public interest in defecting nuns is somewhat ironic, since the Sister Marie-Alex-Neil story was played to great effect almost 15 years later, when public interest would have been even lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't expect Lois to be the same person she was 25 years ago, but she's definitely lost a lot of what made Lois unique.  It's clear the show doesn't know how to write for her, and the sole purpose of Lois is to hide this Gio secret.  It's a shame she doesn't interact with more of the canvas.  It's a waste of Rena's talents. I like Brook Kerr most of the time.  She can be hit or miss.  I totally get what you are saying about her line readings too.  I honestly think the character really suffers being stuck in the Curtis pairing.  She's much better than Tanisha Harper's Jordan lol.
    • Friday and yesterday's episode is what daytime television should be. The other shows airing could take a page from yesterday's show.  I loved the rage, hurt and anger Nicole unleashed on Ted.  Daphnee should be up for an Emmy nom for these scenes.  It broke my heart to see how Dana had locked Eva out.  I do feel sorry for Eva.    I am still bumfuzzled as to why Leslie/Dana went to the DuPree's and asked them to accept Kat UNLESS Eva is really Kat's twin (and really Nicole and Ted's daughter that maybe they though they lost or an embryo Dana/Leslie stole??) I loved how Anita and Vernon both shot her down.    Ohhh and let me just say Friday and yesterday was the MOST fire I have seen Martin have since the show started.  Maybe Brandon Clayborn is coming into his own with the role finally.    
    • You've been seeing him all along. You just didn't know it was him, I guess. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Where to for Dana? She's pissed off the Duprees (most of the cast), alienated her daughter and will she be welcomed by the Have Nots at the diner? Maybe she can befriend Ashley and Derek and liven up their story.
    • Melissa Ordway announced she was moved to recurring back in November but is still credited with the contract cast members.
    • I think of Evan as a smarmy bast*rd. Maybe you'll like that description. You certainly have him pegged correctly since he is just a soldier following "Admiral" Iris's marching orders.  
    • So far the only interest I've seen from Evan to Amanda has been listening to Iris's orders to go and seduce her.  So far he hasn't been successful... but who knows. Amanda is unbearable at times. Entitled, spoiled... idiotic. Iris... so blatantly manipulating her and Amanda takes the bait. But I guess... when she gets in trouble... she'll have a chance to learn. That's what makes these shows so interesting.    Oh, no, don't worry. You haven't ruined a thing. Evan has not been on my radar that much... he was not one of the characters I was caring particularly... so nothing much has been changed for me. I don't think he has the stuff to ruin Rachel's life. He's just a pretty guy that can follow orders. Iris on the other hand... is dangerous. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        P.S Maybe Evan will surprise me. Who knows. 
    • The show has gone back to 10/10 entertainment! I'm glad that I was right in feeling that what were experiencing were growing pains. I'm sure they are not over yet, but I'll know that we always comeback to quality drama. I think it's going to be a hell of ride (in a good way) from this moment on. BTG has that magic that not a lot of shows have. I'll update more... when I'm done catching up.
    • So very glad to hear this. Yesterday I suddenly thought; OMG, what about spoilers, have I just  ruined things for Maxim in getting carried away with interest in Evan, who was so well-written & well-acted. BTW, your fan review of this episode was a sight for eyes that had not seen one of these for a little bit too long, LOL!!!  Mitch is also fascinating to me but in his case it's because he was all in with Janice & her nefarious plan & then he did this turnabout we've mentioned & he basically got off scot-free.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy