Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The actors know the ends for their characters right? After this I'm thinking more and more that J&E don't end up together and Walt knows this. So he's questioning, what if any role he'd have in the new AMC. I know people are going to throw tomatoes at me for suggesting that the all mighty J&E don't end up together...but I've thought for awhile, especially after LB's comments, I'm convinced that EK will likely end up alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think J&E lost whatever luster that most people thought they had, years ago. And really, if Erica just quickly forgives and forget that Jack didn't know...it'll really make her look bad. Agnes Nixon has always liked her strong and independent, and I think AN sees J&E a like I always have. We'll see. But Walt might know that his days are number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He is a fuddy duddy. I saw a link at welovesoaps or daytimeconfidential to some sort of video web series based on the computer game "Mortal Kombat" I never played the game but decided to take a look and I was really impressed with the quality compared to the bottom of the barrel Gotham, Venice and The Bay.

Just watch this in full screen and decide for yourself whether it is possible to have a viable and good looking show online.

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sqlaU5OMsks" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe that's what soaps needs though?

If some people can't get on a computer because they don't know how to operate one then maybe soaps needs to go for the viewers that are more techincally savvy and dare I say younger?

Someone mentioned above that there would definitely be some changes...I'm kinda hoping for changes because not having any changes is part of the problem of why soaps are dying out.

Don't get me wrong, I do not want a Peapack Pine Valley but I do hope for some trimming of the fat and storylines that aren't so dated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love how people are acting like Walt Willey is somehow unfamiliar with the soap audience. He knows what he's talking about. He has been working in this business for decades. The soap audience as a whole doesn't embrace change. That's how we got here. Victor Newmann, Erica Kane, Vicky Whatever last name whatever last name she's using this week, Dorian Lord, Tad Martin, Luke Spencer, Marlena Evans, Bo and Hope, the Hubbards, etc... soaps are all about characters doing the same thing for years and never really changing. That's a defining characteristic of the genre and it killed the genre.

Walt is right. When (not if) these shows aren't daily, don't have the same characters or Llanfair doesn't look the same, the same people who fought to "save our soaps" will start a movement to burn down PP for perverting their precious shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with him, but that he basically said fans would learn their efforts were worthless (I know that's not what he said explicitly but that's what "hollow victory" signifies to me) goes a bit further than just that soap fans will have a tough time getting used to the new format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But is not liking change or being willing to adapt to the change in a TV show the same as not being internet savvy? That particular comment rubbed me the wrong way. It smacks of the condescension that has been heaped on soap fans by TPTB for far too long, imo. Are there really that many people under 60 who don't know how to use a computer or watch shows online? It's not exactly rocket science.

To me that's a very different issue then saying these shows are built on habit and when that habit is broken people won't come back. Also, watching online demands more attention than watching on TV, that's an issue for me. I rarely sit and just devote myself to the TV. In fact, I'm generally working on my computer while I listen/ watch. That's a bigger issue, imo, than people not being savvy enough to figure out how to watch.

Still, he has the right to his opinion and he's met more soap fans than I have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that's true. The fans who fought the hardest did so because they didn't want anything to change. Those people are also going to be the ones most disappointed by the new shows.

As for fans not being internet savvy, he's right. Walt may not realize it but he touched on a far bigger cultural issue: the digital divide. I make my living on the internet. On any given day I'm working on my company's websites AND on 2-3 different message boards, Facebook and chat. I watch most of my television online mainly because, like my caterer friend, that's easiest for me. I've also done work with community organizations working to get underrepresented populations (mainly seniors and minorities) online. Believe me when I tell you that there is a HUGE gulf between the online and offline populations in this country. It's not about looking down on anybody. It's about the reality that huge parts of our population live in.

It's easy for us to say soap fans are online because we are online soap fans. We aren't the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you're saying, but don't you think a lot of the fans who worked so hard on this SOS stuff were probably more Internet savvy than the average viewer? They're more likely to be able to watch the new AMC. That's why I don't quite get the "hollow victory" comment. It's the fans who may have written some letters or made a few phone calls or at most sent out an e-mail or two, if that, who may be more likely to feel left behind by this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hello to everybody!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm writing a series of essays about the first time of a LGBT character in US soaps. I already have datas about Sharon Duvall in DAYS (1977) as first Bisex, Lynn Carson in AMC (1983) as first Lesbian, Hank Elliott on ATWT (1989) as first Gay (someone have or can find the episode in which Paul Ryan finds out about Hank and does not take it very well? I have seen Hank's coming out to Iva and when Hank gets a bullet to save Paul's life from the latter evil father and when he gets tested for HIV after finding out Charlie's diagnosis, but Soap Opera Digest recaps are too much concises...) and Billy Douglas on OLTL (1992) as first LGBT teen in both daytime and primetime TV (I have seen all the episodes on You Tube. BTW, what a great storyline, why it was ignored by the Emmys? Andrew Carpenter and Billy's father players are both really great in their roles! Oh, well, if OLTL was not nominated for Best Drama in 1994 with Marty's gang rape story which won four major awards and was spectacular, no surprise at all - sadly) and I have read something about Azure in The City (1996) as first Trans, but I'd like to see the episode where Bernado finds out and Azure confirms what is said in that newspaper to have something to quote. I like quoting, it gives the essays more depth. I already read the biweekly recaps from Soap Opera Digest on Tumblr and single episodes recaps on IMDB, but I'd like to have more to write about. And something more about critics and public opinions - I only knows that the storyline was rapidly axed because of bad writing and bad performance by Carlotta Chung, but I have nothing to quote.   PS Thank you @JAS0N47 for your incredible and rich site (and work on it). In particular for the Nielsen ratings on weekly basis lists since 1974 and for everything about Sharon Duval - specially for the script of the confession episode dated 23 May 1977! I'm not a DAYS viewers (I'm Italian, I live in Italy and on You Tube there is almost nothing if not short videos), but I've seen some clips of Marlena's first possession (Deidre Hall is terrific in it! Storyline is garbage, but it has its chilling moments and it is funny - I laugh everytime I remember Kristen say to Marlena "according to the book of demonology"! Was she an espert of demons or what!? ) and read on Soap Opera Central daily recaps about infamous Melaswen (brainwashed Marlena has a particular sense of humor - killing ex alcoholic Maggie with a bottle of wine and Alice with her donuts...), so I know something about the soap. Little, but better than nothing.
    • May 14, Asher Antonyzyn (Danny) interview

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm curious the motivation for keeping Bela on beyond the circus story arc.  Did he play a character like his character on EON, or was he more of a good guy? I know he ended up with Sunny at the end of the series, but I always thought that Sunny/Hogan could have been revived once the lack of chemistry between him and the NuLiza became apparent.   Actually... the NuLiza (Louan Gideon) reminded me more of Sunny than she did Liza as played by Sherry... and she just threw off the whole vibe of the show. I see Estelle has just arrived in the late October 1985 episodes, which only means that Wendy and Stephanie are soon on their way out.   It also appears that the Sarah/Quinn/Wendy triangle was set up by Mayer.. and it looks as though Tomlin is going to deactivate it by the introduction of Colleen Dion's character.   I don't understand why no one on the show thought to look at Quinn and realize that he was the problem and write him out.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I kind of assume they're toning down Rachel's bad seed tendencies a bit to make it less obvious if they're going for her as the shooter. At least that's what I hope they're doing - I've really enjoyed Rachel being a bratty evil DiMera princess and Marlena finally getting a grandchild she deserves. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Jason and hemming and hawing about Sidwell taking over and being ruthless

      Please register in order to view this content

      . This show is so stupid. Sonny killed an FBI agent less than a year ago by shooting him at point blank range. But the new short bald man is much much worse cause he was a bad guy in some part of Africa and managed to not kill Lucky, Isaiah, Jason, or Anna. This show is crippled by the mob all these years after Guza has been long gone.    Laura is literally saying oooo but Sonny is a good mobster for Port Charles. Give me a [&#33;@#&#036;%^&amp;*].ing break. Sometimes I don’t know why I watch this joke of a show.
    • With all the changes Sunny was one of the longest running characters by that time.  She had never been married and had heaps of story potential. I can see America getting with SFT -you know 'the circus soap'. Smart move because circuses were all the rage with the kids in the 80's. Maybe Stu and Jo could have bought the circus.
    • It is actually pathetic, that Victor’s 50 year old children are still written as scared of this man that has to sit in every scene. I get it, EB has been on the show for almost 50 years, but I don’t care. He’s a man in his 80’s and should not be the damn lead and driving force because you don’t want to upset Eric Braeden ‘s fragile ego that only exists because the writers have cowtowed to this man for so long.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy