Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I wonder if they want ALL the audience. That 10% figure just keeps nagging at me. Then I go look at OLTL's facebook page and see that 420,000 people like that page, and over 10,000 are talking about OLTL right now (not sure where that measure comes from but . . . ) and it makes you kind of wonder. They're not saving the soaps for the fans. They're doing it to get to the viewers with their advertisements. The online portion of the total audience has always been very small relative to the overall viewing audience. But they're also the most highly invested and tech savvy portion of the audience. Social Networking has changed advertising and marketing strategies and it's still on a development curve. Maybe that is the audience they are trying to appeal to.

Unfortunately, I think our ending will be worse as a function of Carlivati having more time to screw it up than was available to AMC, and by virtue of PP seemingly being more invested in OLTL from the beginning. They do not see this as a conclusion, so I think we will be left hanging. Tina and Cord got their happy ending. I think Rex and Gigi and Shane will. Maybe Clint and Viki and Bo and Nora. But that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do agree with you but the companies like AT&T, Verizon, etc are already in bed with companies like google, youtube, netflix etc plus those companies are trying to start there own thing also with the added bonus of having big name celebrities involved in projects. PP isn't the only one doing original online programming, can't say for sure but maybe investors are more willing to go with an already established company rather than a start-up. Big broadcasters already have their feet in the water, most already have websites that air their shows producing an online show will be relatively easy for them to do.

My point is that PP doesn't need to be company to develop the niche there are already many companies out there trying to accomplish that very thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The real question is - who wanted to see Max in Blair's story again? I don't remember fans ever liking this relationship.

If Max did return, it should have been for scenes with Tina or Gabrielle. Or even Roxy.

I'm sure budget did play a part, but I would have been happy to have never seen Mr. HAVE A SEAT PA PA STEPNORA HAVE A SEAT HAVE A SEAT again, and I'm sure that would have saved a fair amount of money.

I don't care that much about Max but I would have wanted to have seen Larry one more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It depends on what your idea of a high note is. I'm sure the "heroes" of Llanview will be happy. That covers John, Clint, Rex, Ford. It sounds like Bo and Nora will have a happy ending. I guess Natalie will be happy. I would assume Tea will have some type of closure, even if it's included in a cliffhanger. Starr as well, since KA is leaving. Viki seems to be on the way to a "happy" ending with Clint.

The essence of OLTL is diversity and community spirit. AMC, with many flaws, did sort of go back to its origins in the last few episodes. Ideally OLTL would do that, but I'm not sure what those at OLTL see as OLTL's spirit. For all I know, it will be a racially diverse, campy gangbang at the KAD freehouse, with Austin Peck making jerkoff faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is why I hate PP with a passion: they gave the Nixon soap fans false hope, which is something that I consider more evil than the devil.

Now, fans are far more heartbroken than if this long-shot venture never even happened to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they do fall through with this, then it will suck and they will look bad, but in terms of being angered by crappy behavior regarding OLTL I don't think anything can top what was done to Lillian Hayman, Scott Evans, or Brett Claywell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whatever happens, I think this PP business has made something crystal clear: soaps in their current form are prohibitively expensive. The SOS crowd loves to throw hate on the replacement shows but those shows are cheaper and that's what really matters. There's a reason we haven't seen a new soap in 15+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have to tell you that you're entitled to your opinion, but if you must hate, I say keep the hate focused on the folks who drove the soaps into the ground and necessitated their "saving" to begin with. They may have a lot to learn, but I will never fault PP for trying when no one else dared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just wish the networks would say it. A lot of fans will always be angry when a soap goes but they'd be less angry if they were told flat out it's economics, not that they are fat and stupid and now they have something to help them stop being so fat and stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont know maybe I am wrong but other than Brian Frons who has the tact of Glenn Beck, I dont recall any other exec saying that. I never got the impression :Les Moonves took any particular satisfaction in cancelling GL or ATWT and he always came across that the CBS cancellations were more about economics than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy