Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I dont know if the actors would wanan play 5 years older. I hope PP just doesnt do it cause CM wants it. I hope SL would be like Hell to the No. Bad enough I got like 5 grandkids already as Erica.

Plus they would have to do a the same jump for OLTL. I say one at the most. Six months at the least

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They have before and could again. It would be problematic. One year at the most. Beyond that nope too much.

Plus if folks just wnat the jump so they can SORAS the kids. Outside Miranda and AJ and Kathy those kids arent seen too often

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know what the actors preferences have to do with anything. They can easily jump 3-5 years and still maintain the ages the main characters are now. Its not like they would grey up Erica Kane or put her in a wheelchair. I think some suspension of reality is to be expected. An age is just a number anyway. 5 years might be too much but 3 years could be reasonable.Any time they soras a kid we suspend some semblence of reality anyway don't we? How may kids actually grow up on screen from birth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All of sudden now we care about linear time on soaps? Soaps?! Where one night can last a week and a half, people can fly to France in two hours without going through airport security and women can know they're pregnant before they've even taken a post-sex shower? The actors don't have to "play" older because we don't know how old the characters are now. And can we please get rid of the noise that its Susan Lucci who has a problem being called grandmother? That's an Erica Kane thing. Lucci has no problem discussing her age and she is a proud grandmother.

As for OLTL, their timeline is irrelevant to AMC's. And seeing as how they have a 7-year-old teenager walking around on screen, I think it's a little late to be worried about the space-time continuum.

How many primetime shows have done time jumps successfully? The tactic works and AMC needs something to put a little distance between what it was and what it will be. Assuming it will be at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think a year is more than sufficient. A lot can happen in a year. Frankly, establishing that *any* time has passed since the final network episode takes the show "off the hook" for restructuring and working around the absences of some characters. Plus, we're all used to characters still being in town yet never seen. Someone like Randi for example could be referred to yet unseen if DV doesn't continue with PP. If Frankie's still on board and they want to give him a new romantic story down the line, they cross that Randi bridge when they get to it.

I think the passage of a year could be particularly interesting re: the fallout of whomever got shot by J.R. (perhaps he shot himself?). My hunch is that the passage of time would do nothing for the Erica/Jack cliffhanger, and we'd be back to the same old same old Erica-Jack *thang* they've been doing for damn near 20 years now. Now, if we opened the first episode with Jack having giggly pillow talk with Brooke, then we cut to a delapidated Chandler mansion with unwashed Adam and Erica playing spades on a TV tray shooting Jameson and smoking Black & Milds, we have a show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. It's not that the new episodes are five years in the future, it's that the old episodes are five years in the past.

Desperate Housewives, One Tree Hill and Ghost Whisperer all did successful five year time jumps. Veronica Mars was set to do it when they got canceled. LOST jumped back and forth between a three year "then" and "now."

For those who are so concerned about time, I have a few questions: When was JR born? When was Kendall born? How old is Frankie? How old is Frankie's kid with Liza's sister? How old is Bianca? How old is Scott? How old is Erica Kane, (not Susan Lucci) but Erica Kane?

This is the perfect chance for AMC to reset the base timeline after decades of bullshit sorasing and plot point time bending. Whether it's three years or five years, it doesn't change anything on screen and it gives AMC a much needed fresh start. I know a lot of people just want to pick up where we left off but that wasn't working. Something has to change.

As for AMC and OLTL being connected because they're both "Agnes" shows, I don't think that even warrants discussion. The average viewer neither knows nor cares about that and for them each show exists within it's own reality. That said, I didn't know Agnes was consulting on PP's version of OLTL too. God bless her. That woman is unstoppable. *slow standing clap*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Keith D Robinson is 49. Maurice Johnson is 46.
    • I hope they give him more to do than just be a prick as you say. I can see how viewers would like him because the actor is so charming despite the character being such an absolute pain.    I would agree. And there was also the undercurrent of Raven and Draper sort of flirting with each other. The actors play that attraction and it worked so well in that scene. 
    • Daniel Cosgrove is PERFECT as the sleezy politician. This might be my favorite role of his. All of these people keeping Kristina’s secret is so annoying. I really want her to pay.
    • What did happen to Beth between 86 and 89? Did she have amnesia?
    • I actually thought he came off as younger. It's so hard to buy Martin as Nicole and Ted's son unless they had him when they were 12.
    • @chrisml Isn't remarkable that, on a soap whose brand is built on twists and mysteries, that Raven's last straw was as simple as Logan saying that she was incapable of loving Jamey.  In the episode when Raven exit's and leaves Jamey with April, I can remember feeling the subtext that Raven is also trying to talk herself into leaving him behind.  There's so much in that little scene.  She's trying to stick it to Logan for saying she was a bad mother.  She's both granting April's wish, and damning her with the old adage of being careful what she wished for.  And, she's hinting to Draper that she's going to boff his father. It remains my favorite scene, and it still blows my mind that was not the end of that episode.  
    • Oh lord not Drew just figured out it was both Nina and Portia that set him up. Willow WILL never leave this man. Ric taking the case purely just to spite Sonny is [!@#$%^&*].ing hilarious.
    • And in addition to Patti being de-aged, she was no longer a nurse, divorced from Len(fair enough) and her two children were not seen and barely mentioned. So basically she was a totally new character. For newer viewers it didn't matter but any loyal viewers would have been wondering about all the changes with Patti. Sarah Whiting always puzzled me. The writers finally decide to acknowledge Jo's family and do so by making up a never mentioned adopted teen. Why not just bring in Tracey, Jo's actual grandaughter? As for Liza, perhaps it would have been wise to rest the character when Sherry left. They were big shoes to fill and her Liza was so identified with Travis. I don't recall what was going on in the story at that time but if they knew Sherry was leaving, write it so Liza would leave town to care for an ailing Janet and take a breather with the character for a few months.
    • Ahh interesting. Yeah, that's sad for A-M. I will say, he and Nick became fast friends when Susan started working at Spaulding. A-M/Lucy/Nick/Susan had a lot of double dates in those 7 months. A-M was Nick's best man at his wedding to Susan, which now that I think about it, is odd that he wouldn't have considered Fletcher. I remember those two were so close at the paper, and even living together with Ben. Once Tangie left SF, Nick left the paper, and Fletcher/Holly were rarely seen... so I guess they felt that friendship wasn't shown often enough anymore (which again, lazy writing).
    • I honestly don't think Alan-Michael ever really had a friend on the show. Maybe Cameron or Samantha, but otherwise... *Cameron was a high school friend who ended up dating teenage Dinah after she broke up with A-M. Samantha is Phillip's biological sister, who A-M treated like a sister. Interestingly enough, they were born the same week on the show in 1981, but A-M ends up being older than her when she returns to town in '89.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy