Jump to content

June 6-10, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I was just going to post that I feel bad for B&B, because I think over the past one or two years that they have tried to do concrete things to turn things around. Unlike other soaps they didn't just rely on stunts or bring back older fan favorite characters, they were one of the first shows to fire several key people behind the scenes as well as some actors who couldn't pull their weight. I don't watch the show, but it seems like they were more serious about making changes than some other shows.

While B&B is the most watched soap in the world, that doesn't mean anything to CBS, since they are sharing in the profit from that situation, and I think that Bradley Bell knows that in order to continue being the most popular soap, that the show needs to be filmed in the US, and that the production standards need to be kept at a level that he won't be able to achieve if CBS drops the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A 1.8 is awesome. Who cares that it's just a tenth of a point lower than what ATWT was averaging for the year when it was canceled, or just two tenths higher than what GL was getting the year of its demise. Obviously, the fact that OLTL is beating AMC and GH means that the wrong show was canceled, and that it was canceled because ABC doesn't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you Bella and Jane! That was quick~

And thank you for putting words into our mouths. Such a joke.

No one is celebrating. It is simply a bunch of dying dogs. We are grateful that our dog is feeling a little better. But we know he isn't gonna make it. We just enjoy the minor victories.

No one said anything about the wrong soap being cancelled. YOU said that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*Sigh* Same numbers, same fight. I'm sorry I posted them.

Anyway totally different subject. B&B is watched globally and apparently performs respectably. Even if CBS were to cancel them wouldn't it make sense for Sony to find another outlet for that show? One that could build the global audience?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree. They may have done a few superficial changes, but when it comes down to business this show is stuck in the 90s. If Brad Bell wanted to really change this show the first thing he would have to do is stop returning to the Brooke/Ridge/Taylor triangle and have Ridge hop between those two women every six months. It's a triangle that has overstayed its welcome by at least 10 years. He did make one change last year when he had Brooke and Stephanie bury the hatchet, but guess what....it lasted around six months and now we're back to business as usual in that department again. He had an interesting story starting to unfold between Jackie/Owen/Bridget, but that just ended almost from one episode to another. He made a complete and utter mess of both Sarah Brown's and Rick Hearst's arrivals, and they're already gone. And as for Amber she has almost the exact same story she had almost 15 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is, how hard will it be for the Bells to find a home in the US, so that they can continue to produce the show. No other network, even the cable ones, are going to enter into a deal with them without getting a piece of What the Bell's make from their international license. Aside from that, that the show is produced in the US is a major reason why it is so popular in some countries. The show being canceled or not airing here reduces its value.

Like I said, I don't watch the show, so I can't speak to the quality of the storylines, even though I do remember seeing countless promos for Brooke and Ridge's wedding a few years back, and even though they made it seem like this was the last time, it seemed like the next month they were airing promos about Ridge being back with Taylor. I agree with what you are saying, but it just seems like when the ratings started to fall that Brad Bell was quick to start making changes. Most of the other soaps tend to wait forever before they fire the people who are producing the show, or firing actors who aren't doing their job. But, as with ABC and Frons, it would seem that the main problem is whoever is afraid to move away from the played out Brooke, Ridge and Taylor triangle.

LOL, nobody said it this week, but it would be a lie to say that this has never been stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What AW stories do you think of as DOOLish? I mean AW, in a very positive way was KNOWN for its comedic elements. From Iris's maid, Vivian, to the naming of plants, to highjinks with Cass, Felicia, Wally & even Lily, plus remember Dee Evans & Tony the Tuna? In a way at one time DAYS had similar with Caliope & Eugene. 
    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy