Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I am a huge fan of a couple foodie shows, just not sure this one is my bag. Not that I don't appreciate that Dr. Oz brand of informative healthy food talk, but what sells me on a food show is the 30 minute long tortuous mouth-watering foodgasm. I find Batali off-putting, and I have never watched Top Chef but Carla Hall strikes me as someone I might like (I'm probably just saying that because shes from around my way... she did a little food symposium 5 min. from me a couple months back and I really wish I would have gone if only to see how that experience with her would have colored my opinion of this show).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I miss him, God rest his soul. :blush: I will NEVER forget the first time I saw him slap down a fat, raw white skinned alligator tail on the cutting board, the audience winced. Also a huge fan of Jacques Pepin, especially when he is with Julia or his daughter Claudine. I thank these PBS shows for providing just enough background while not being too distracting while getting me through weekends of too much damn high school homework! :angry: I still catch them from time to time but now it is all about Adam, Andrew, Anthony, Gordon, and Guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well it's one thing when you're smug and nasty to fans about landing your new gig like Mario has been, but to me, attacking these shows' fan pages is akin to writing hate mail to a recast. the anger is misplaced. take it out on the network that gave the order. No one should be 'punished' for seizing what for them is a wonderful career opportunity, one which they and their loved ones are certainly thrilled about. I am sure many of them are conscious of how this sucks for the soap fans, but I cant blame them for being happy for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they want to work through their delusion anger by posting crap on ABC's page, great. But when they start attacking the pages of these chefs and other people who will be taking these slots then they're going to far. Unfortunately, that's been a real problem with the Soap Fan Taliban. It's a "you're with us or against us" mentality completely devoid of perspective and they throw a pretty wide net for the "against us." It's not just the people who canceled these shows who are the enemy. It's also the fans who accepted the cancellation, the sponsors who didn't pull ads, the cast and crew of these new shows for daring to take an opportunity offered to them, Susan Lucci for saying that she was looking forward to the next chapter of her life, and Oprah for not spending millions of dollars to buy these soaps even though there was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to think she would.

And I have no doubt that after the protest tomorrow they'll have a whole new list of perceived insults. CRY FREEDOM!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of the problems is that at times it seems like if any fan doesn't just say, "Hey, daytime has been dead from the start, it's long overdue, no big deal," then that means this person is delusional, pathetic, etc. So that means there's no real middle ground anymore between someone being happy the shows are gone and being crazy and OTT like some fans have been over the last month.

I think leaving messages on the Facebook pages is pointless...I guess it's the modern day equivalent of a fan who says they won't watch the soap replacing their soap. I think if people are unhappy then they should just vote with their remote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's one thing that I just don't understand: many fans have been complaining for years that Frons has made the ABC soaps unwatchable and unrecognizable. Given this fact, why are these same fans so livid that these shows are being taken off the air (when, thinking rationally about this, it would be better for these soaps to go now than for them to experience years of further decline under Frons)?

Here's another paradox: there are still some other people out there (albeit a relatively small group) who are raving about how wonderful OLTL is at the moment; yet, these same individuals are trashing Frons for being (and always having been) a complete and utter incompetent. However, if OLTL is so wonderful right now, doesn't that mean that Frons has done at least one thing right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We often hear that the quality of the soap was meaningless, and that it is all about OJ making women go work and find cable channels, and that soaps died in 1956 and that it's just no one noticed until now.

I tend to agree more with you that it was about the soaps losing their luster and what made them special.

I would like to see daytime continue in some form, but I have zero confidence in anyone running the networks now to make it happen, and I think they are just slapping together shows instead of working on why viewers have moved on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember the certainty that Let's Make a Deal would flop when GL was cancelled. Well, enough people are watching Let's Make a Deal to make CBS a profit because of its lower production costs. The new ABC shows don't need a huge audience, they just have to draw enough women in the key demos and it is all good for ABC. I have no idea what is going to happen with these new shows, no one does, but we will soon enough.

This isn't true. There is a ton of levels on the middle ground. The problem is that there are a lot of the soap fans simply are not standing there. They are standing on variations of psychotic soap fandom which no perspective. There is simply too much crazy out there right now.

Considering we have been debating in the decline in the soap ratings for the last few years on the SON ratings thread, it is clear that lots of soap fans did notice that the genre was in trouble. I remember us looking at MarkH's graphs and guessing when we thought the cancellation point would reach for the remaining soaps. I also recall a few of us on other threads coming up with ideas about how to revamp the soaps. I and a few others suggested a telenovela format only to be shouted down by a few. There was also the suggest of cutting back the number of episodes per week like the British soaps. Another suggestion was a reality type soap. I think that the soaps will return in a new format a few years down the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the truly livid (and psychotic) fans are those who are satisfied with what the soaps are dishing out now. You have to trudge through the jungle known as the AMC Facebook page to fully understand.

Viki and Dorian fight. "I'm SO GLAD Frons is leaving OLTL alone and letting RC write his stuff!"

Star/James two-hander. "Frons needs to LEAVE OLTL ALONE!! And let RC write his stuff!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if there was that much certainty with LMAD. GL was in the pits, ratings-wise, and as soon as it was obvious how cheaply produced LMAD was, I don't think there was a huge expectation for failure. I'm sure the show is doing OK, but CBS' silence on it doesn't suggest to me that it was entirely what they expected. The last time I saw the ratings it was doing worse in the demos and in the household ratings than GL, which is quite a feat. If that has continued, or worsened, then CBS probably isn't making the profit they expected. Ultimately they may decide that giving up on the timeslot altogether is cheapest.

I think that, like with The Talk, all these various hosts are going to drain some money, and I'm sure Mario Batalli must be a fairly big name. I guess it's down to expectations. Is ABC looking to find all kinds of viewers who don't watch daytime and who want a new way to live? If so I think that will need more creativity and competence than anyone at ABC has these days. Is ABC looking for a less expensive replacement for their soaps that will plod along? That could happen. And ultimately it will probably just lead to that timeslot being given away.

I guess I am just used to most soap fans who voice unhappiness with the cancellations or the new shows being told, essentially, that the soaps suck, so they shouldn't complain, that everyone knows daytime has been dead for years and years, that it's not fair to the new shows to be unhappy about them, and so on.

There's also some middle areas that I wouldn't do but I didn't see as being all that horrible, like the people who took out the ad in the Hollywood Reporter. They were called crazy, people said this was all just a con to steal money, etc.

Everything ends up blurring together because sometimes I get the feeling that anything beyond a shrug is seen as too much. But that's just me, and I may be wrong.

I do think there's a lot of craziness and bitterness that is unwarranted, but fortunately I only go to one or two soap boards now so I don't have to see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's a combination. The market has changed and the product hasn't evolved.

If you've noticed it's the OLTL pimps like Jamey, Nelson and others, who are exhorting fans to crazier and crazier behavior (followed often by a quick backtracking). It's the reason I have no interest in these protests and petitions. The people pushing them are being disingenuous on a lot of levels and at some point they need to take responsibility for the fact they helped create this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And why don't they want us? Because of the loud-mouthed few who make the rest look like complete lunatics. TPTB cannot hold a discourse with them, let alone please them, so now they're at the point where they'd be done with the whole lot of us.

Of course, what they've forgotten is that no viewer is more loyal than a soap viewer. We're used to shows rising and falling in quality from time to time. We're used to it, and we ride it out unless or until it becomes absolutely unbearable -- and for many, that rock bottom is pretty damn far down. Non-soap fans? Not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy