Jump to content

B&B: January Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Lol....I like it blush.gif it is pretty overkill but I appreciate the show addressing this, as out of nowhere as it is. Maybe I'm the only one, and this is so strange, but as I've been watching I just keep picturing someone else who smokes watching B&B & being inspired to stop or try other safer alternatives. LOL if I smoked and came across this I think I would consider it. The show has been beating this for days now and its getting old but I think it's had a good impact. Basically, I agree It's on the boring side but I think overall it's delivering a great message!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL at Tawney's trailer being filled with stray cats! I actually kind of enjoyed her & Amber today (loved the Amber flashbacks), but Carl the lab assistant guy ruined it for me...ugh, switching paternity results, just...ugh.

I don't know what the beef is between Pam & Donna since I haven't been watching long. Pam tried to have a bear kill Donna?! LOL. Wow. After hearing that I thought it was in very bad taste of her & Stephen to just charge in there like that, announce their engagement, & then Pam suggest they all have a double wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Drizzling honey all over her while tied to a chair and leading a bear in (or however exactly it went down) is kind of the least of the Pam/Donna feud. Pam's repeatedly humiliated her because she "blames" Donna for her beloved rottweiler's death and the fact she's always considered Eric Steph's property. The last shot (I believe) was having Donna hauled away in an exterminator's van from Forrester. (although that may have been Brooke, I'm often confused on this crap.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't like the idea of "family's coming together", at least not on soaps! So I think it's annoying that Brooke wants Steph to end the Forrester/Logan feud. What will there be to look forward to then?? I love the light-heartedness of the show lately, but I don't want them to water it down to much! I was thinking this was temporary but I'm getting the feeling it's not...LOL. Hopefully when Steffy gets back she thinks all of this is nonsense and tries to whip Stephanie back into shape. I'm sure Steffy will be a little shocked at seeing how friendly Brooke and Stephanie have become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Besides it getting quite silly, I got sick of the Forester / Logan feud it began to repeat itself and not in a good way. I've watched since day one though. I liked the Amber flashbacks too...I agree about the smoking thing it needs to be toned down its way OTT even though I understand its a back up to her cancer storyline ... its just like someone posted an obvious PSA maybe if it was blended into a storyline or something...jmo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not really a Logan/Forrester feud---it's been Brooke vs. Steph. Sure, there were little skirmishes---Donna/Steph, Rick/Ridge, Storm/Stephen vs. Steph---those were short-lived. Steph even downright adored Katie until she cheated with Nick on Bridget.

With Brooke and Steph on the same team, any feud is over. And in some ways, I think it's time to move on from it and set up Brooke as the Forrester Matriarch in Waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they tried to make it into a Forrester/Logan feud and that just never worked for me, because everything with Katie and Donna seems so fake. They bear no real resemblance to what Katie and Donna were and their relationship with Brooke hasn't been the same either. Bill Bell very deliberately chose not to have B&B with some premise of warring families, and I think his idea worked. I still don't understand why they had to do what they did to Storm or to Beth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: Felicia started out as camp bitch on a very dreary show (with Cecile being the only somewhat fun character around that point) and then got into a lot of comedy. Some of the comedy was very stupid, but many viewers still felt drawn to it, to Lily, Cecile, Cass, Felicia, Kathleen, Wallingford. There was a vibrancy which Dano fit well in, her fashions and melodrama parodied in a gentle way. This was missing in some of the long-suffering parts she'd had had on shows like ATWT. By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy