December 31, 201015 yr Member SOD is hinting that Erica wasnt the one who shot David, so any guesses on who did the deed? I cant imagine someone else being on that roof and no one seeing BTW, what an ugly cover of Braedon. Horribly done and this thing didnt need to be the full spread Edited December 31, 201015 yr by Cheap21
December 31, 201015 yr Member SOD is hinting that Erica wasnt the one who shot David, so any guesses on who did the deed? I cant imagine someone else being on that roof and no one seeing BTW, what an ugly cover of Braedon. Horribly done and this thing didnt need to be the full spread EB eyes are creeping me out! As for Who Shot David, the writing is on the wall, it's never as it seems in Pine Valley.
December 31, 201015 yr Member The spoilers from that edition of SOD say it's really Kendall who shot David. She doesn't remember doing it, but Erica witnessed the whole thing that night. Edited December 31, 201015 yr by AllmyDaysatGH
December 31, 201015 yr Member It's Kendall, always has been. I took one look at La Kane coming around that corner and knew she wasn't the shooter. It was even more clear when Erica was telling Caleb what happened that second time on the roof that she couldn't possibly be the shooter. I want to hope this storyline turns out well, but this is K&S, so I'm just going to take the VI/SL amd AM interaction and try to be satisfied with that.
December 31, 201015 yr Member SOD is hinting that Erica wasnt the one who shot David, so any guesses on who did the deed? I cant imagine someone else being on that roof and no one seeing BTW, what an ugly cover of Braedon. Horribly done and this thing didnt need to be the full spread Seriously, this is ALL SOD has to report on soaps... the EB incident.....LOL......Who the [!@#$%^&*] cares. Man soaps are in the toilet if this is all SOD can come up with. Edited December 31, 201015 yr by Soapsuds
January 1, 201115 yr Author Member why the heck would Kendall even be on the roof of Ryan's apartment? If she was in a daze and in that daze out to kill David, there would be no reason for her to expect to find him there
January 1, 201115 yr Member ^That was the question I asked from the start, only about Erica instead of Kendall. I don't know how and why they're going to say that Kendall got there, but it's been pretty clear from the start it wasn't Erica. Edited January 1, 201115 yr by Kylie
January 1, 201115 yr Member Seriously, this is ALL SOD has to report on soaps... the EB incident.....LOL......Who the [!@#$%^&*] cares. Man soaps are in the toilet if this is all SOD can come up with. I don't blame SOD for making the most of this story. It's the closest thing to relevance soaps have seen in years.
January 1, 201115 yr Member I don't blame SOD for making the most of this story. It's the closest thing to relevance soaps have seen in years. I think it's more because it involves Eric Braeden. He tends to get more media coverage than most other soap actors. His contract issues also made EW and made the cover of SOD last year.
January 1, 201115 yr Member I think it's more because it involves Eric Braeden. He tends to get more media coverage than most other soap actors. His contract issues also made EW and made the cover of SOD last year. That's what I meant. EB, NPH, Twitter... Like I said, it's the most relevance soaps have had in years. No wonder SOD ran with it,
January 2, 201115 yr Member I think it's just more an excuse to put EB on the cover again -- he must be a big seller for them. You're right though. It sort of says it all about daytime's relevance when a month-old scandal that only lasted more than a few hours because of EB's publicity hunger is the closest they get to attention in the press.
January 2, 201115 yr Member I think it's just more an excuse to put EB on the cover again -- he must be a big seller for them. I agree because I think it's more about SOD's circulation. I'm surprised anyone buys that anymore. You can get any information online. Edited January 2, 201115 yr by MontyB
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.