Jump to content

Y&R: Old Articles


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Gosh, I'd completely forgotten Tim Sullivan had MARRIED Andrea Wiley.  I was thinking she was just his girlfriend.  

CRICKET:  "Traci, it's not a new life that you need, but a whole new attitude toward the one that you have.  When you feel differently about yourself, it changes you.  And it changes the way other people look at you."  

TRACI:  "But Cricket, you're so thin and so pretty!"  

(I about vomited during that exchange.  Such pearls of wisdom from a 15-year-old!  And she's repaid with a deluge of compliments for her own beauty, of course.)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

 by Aug ‘88, Traci’s attitude towards Cricket has decidedly soured… even though Cricket is “joining the family” through Jessica’s marriage to John, Traci basically treats her as a stranger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great find as always @YRfan23, thanks!! Kind of a wheel-spinning ep but mostly enjoyable.

So weird to hear Jill call Ashley "Ash", like there was a time when they sort-of got along ok.

Amy and Tyrone have no chemistry and leave me feeling cold. She has better chemistry with Nathan but the show never properly invested in them.

Bizarre to realize Terry Lester is a couple eps away from leaving the show! Imagine an alternative universe where he never returned to the show to play out the storyline... 

Does anyone know - was it Nikki who cheated first with Jack, or Victor who cheated first with Ashley? By "cheated",  I mean sex  It's so hard to tell from reading the synopses... I think it might have been Nikki, who mistakenly thought Victor and Ashley had consummated... but I'm not sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My recollection is what you just said --- that Nikki was under the impression Victor had cheated with Ashley (while he really hadn't), so she hopped in bed with Jack.  It's hard to remember because it became so convoluted with Ashley's abortion, Nikki's "impending death", Nikki taking the apartment where she and Jack were meeting, Ashley and Victor's "cabin in the woods".  But yeah, I think Nikki/Jack were the first to cheat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Odd Relationship Highlights Soap"

Jon-Michael Reed

Memphis Commercial Appeal -- April 20, 1977

A day without a smidgen of sexual strife and sin in the soap world is like a day without sunshine. 

But Anita Bryant, who's waging a war against homosexuals in Florida, would choke on her orange rinds if she knew what was going on in Genoa City on "The Young and the Restless".  

There's this alcoholic rich widow, Kay Chancellor, who hired chubby waitress Joann Curtzynski to be her live-in companion.  Joann was going through a lot of grief after being dumped and divorced by her husband Jack, who married a slimmer young lady.  The two lonely ladies overcame their sorrows together.  Joann helped Kay lay off the booze.  Kay encouraged Joann to lay off the calories.  She also financed a beautifying program for the former fatty. 

During this process of living and sharing together, Kay developed what they used to call an "unhealthy" interest in her live-in companion.  Kay's eagle-eyed son Brock was the first to become aware and wary of the relationship.  He warned Joann about becoming too dependent on Kay. 

"I'd never take advantage of your mother or her wealth," said Joann, who missed the point.  "We have something together that money can't buy.  She's given me love and companionship."  

Kay was not as oblivious as Joann when Brock accused her of "trying to be Jack's replacement for Joann."  

"She cares for me in a way that she could never care for that man," answered Kay.  

"That man?  Or any man?" retorted Brock.  "Hasn't it gone beyond friendship?"

It certainly had, with references to sharing sleeping quarters for loneliness' sake, comforting embraces, longingly wistful stares, and restrained holding-back-of-hands-upon-hair.   

Should Y&R audiences be prepared for explicit scenes that would make maidens blush? After all, this type of story has been done in graphic detail on "Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman."  But it's not the stuff that daytime soap operas are made of.  Although it's implicit what's going on in Kay Chancellor's mansion, the Y&R folks insist they're not telling "that" kind of story. 

Jeanne Cooper, who plays Kay, explains, "It's a story of two people who are very lonely.  They just happen to be women sharing the experience of healing their hurts.  When people have been hurt, they tend to look for anything to fill the void.  These are two vulnerable women who have a psychological attraction and dependency on each other.  Kay is desperate to hold onto Joann as the only friend she's ever had.  And Jack is a threat to the end of that relationship."  

"Everyone connected with the show has worked their fannies off not to hit the audience with a heavy trip by implying sexual motives for the woman's actions.  We're telling a tale of two people who need each other psychologically, not physically.  Both of them would jump at a chance with a man, because they are not lesbians.  The response from the audience has been encouraging.  I receive letters from ministers and women who say it's an inspirational story.  They understand the situation, the needs, and the loneliness.  Any other suggestive implications are strictly in the eye of the beholder," Jeanne Cooper concludes.  

Y&R is indeed unraveling an unprecedented-for-daytime situation with tender, cautious care.  It's so poignantly told and subtle that Anita Bryant would undoubtedly approve.  

Still, as Brock asked Kay, "Do you realize where this relationship could lead?"

Tune in tomorrow to see if it leads to the bedroom.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Graet find about a fascinating storyline.

Loved Jeanne's 'lay a heavy trip' comment - sure she picked that line up from a script-sounds very Brock.

The rationale for the story makes perfect sense and Bill Bell was ahead of his time in exploring it.

Interesting that nowadays the women would probably end up in a sexual relationship. I've seen a number of TV shows/movies where straight women fall into bed with each other under and its deemed a natural outcome in the circumstances..

I just this weekend watched the movie Parallel Mothers where, out of the blue, twowomen began a sexual relationship just because of emotional closeness,.

Funny but you never see two guys do the same thing.

I think Bill would never have taken it that far, firstly because of the times, but also he was writing a more nuanced story.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really believe William Bell, back in the 1970s, had a genuine interest in telling a story about "fluid sexuality", but wanted to be thoughtful with it.   (Surely, Lee Phillip had run across something similar on her talk show and shared it with him.) 

Wesley Eure's character on "Days of Our Lives" questioned his sexuality at one point.   And someone on this board has mentioned that one of the Peters brothers on "Days" suddenly acquired a male roommate who appeared to be sharing his bed, which raised an eyebrow (or two), although the situation wasn't delved into on the show. 

I've always thought the Kay Chancellor/Joann Curtis story was fully character-based for both women, and as Jeanne Cooper noted here, the implications were more or less "in the eye of the beholder".   Kay Chancellor could certainly be controlling and possessive -- we'd already seen that trait fully manifested in her -- and she'd been hurt terribly by Phillip and Jill's betrayal.  Joann was reinventing her body (and her entire life) after a terrible hurt.  It made perfect sense for them to seek solace in each other. 

If Bell had decided to take it a step farther, it would've made sense.  If he'd decided to bail-out, he'd created plenty of "escape hatches" -- Derek Thurston's availability, Brock's caution, Peggy's rape, Jack Curtis's indecision. 

For Bell, everything was there; all he had to do was choose his course.  I believe the loss of a ratings point made the decision for William Bell.  But if the ratings hadn't dropped, I would've been interested to see where he intended to go.  Nevertheless, it was a thoughtful and provocative story.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am loving all these 80's eps. Thanks everyone for posting. I do think the June 21 ep is Jul 2 and the Jul 8 ep is Jul 1. Kay told Jill she showed John the photos in the Jun 27 ep and these seem to be from the following week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We also have the partial July 04 ep. Synopsis suggests these eps were from Jul 1 - 5 so my guess would be Jul 01 and 02. The ep listed as Jul 08 preceeds the Jun 21 ep as at the end of the Jul 08 ep Ashley gives Jill the good news about John and the Jun 21 ep picks up right from the same spot. Jack also finds out from Dina that his face is no longer in the pictures in the Jul 08 ep which he tells Jill in the "June 21" episode

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • One little... very little... tiny... minuscule negative comment. I was debating if I should care to say it... In some ways... Silk has been acting clownish... I think they need to dial it back, because if this continues with the current pace... she'll be worse than Sheila in terms of getting totally predictable and not menacing anymore. TMG is one hell of an actress... I just want to see a more normal and less clownish Silkpress in the coming weeks*months. We need to dial down the wigs too. It's becoming a funny caricature and we don't want that. Maybe we do, I'm not sure. I just like her more menacing and sinister than... "Hahhahahah what is she wearing today". That's a personal preference.   So far... I am okay with it... but I have fears this may turn into a really tired joke in the future. I want TMG as long as possible on my screen!  
    • Not really short-lived as GH went to color in 1967, so the blue background actually lasted about twice as long as the black background. You can see it at the very beginning of this set of clips from 1974:

      Please register in order to view this content

      Also would like to put it out there in the universe, as I often do, that the wait for any AMC from 1972-1976 has been too damn long. At this point, it is the only long-running soap (10+ years) that has absolutely zero video clips from that time period online. We have either whole episodes or clips from every year of the show's run except those five, which happen to be the exact years when one of my favorite characters I've never actually seen, Margo Flax, was a major player. Justice for Margo, please.
    • Both EE and Corrie remind me of RC's OLTL, where maybe, just maybe, if we keep bringing up the past in cheesy, forced ways, the audience will transfer their positive memories of better days onto what we're giving them now. I used to love that kind of crap, but it became so constant and transparent with OLTL, not to mention obnoxious as hell. Like when they had KDP singing the Peabo Bryson theme over the opening sequence for an episode or two. I've been reading little blurbs about Sonia's exit, and they all mention trumpets as if the she had grown up and became a trumpet virtuoso. It's too sitcommy to me, just like Bianca being damn near 50 and still wearing the jacket and hoops. But then they like to introduce new young female characters and put them in a metallic jacket and hoops so that the audience will like them right away. Things just hit better when it's more of an "If you know, you know," type of thing. Like Max watching Stacey's plane leave in 2010 as Stacey gazes down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence...just like when Phil watched Kathy's plane leave in 1998 as Kathy gazed down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence. It's like the more "iconic" the original scene is, the less effective the later allusion to it is. B&B and Y&R recreating their first scenes were perfect because we don't get hit over the head with how incredibly iconic those scenes were to begin with.
    • Ted has been too-good-to-be-true-on-the-surface guy from the get go. It's always these guys that end up having a secret mistress with 2 children on the side or are secretly bisexual and sleeping with men while they wifey thinks she is living the dream. Even the way Dani was talking about them in the beginning... I knew it was coming. The show was hinting at it. And it came.  I have nothing against the show writing a second affair, when it's used to present this exact type of message. That the two sisters end up dealing with a similar catastrophe. I would have had problems with it... if it was not written the way it is. But I have no problems with it right now. And I love how the focus is not just on the affair, but on Ted's overall character. His dark side. And, no, you don't need to be a serial killer or a lunatic with a knife to be a bad guy. Sometimes just making bad decisions that end up hurting your entire family makes you that.   
    • Oh, really? I didn't see that at all. Ted's only been loving and supportive, even with this reveal I still haven't seen anything too dark from him. Shitty father and husband, sure. My one nitpick is that they could have accomplished that without having another affair though. 
    • Remember post-ATWT how Brooke Alexander was in eight million commercials and home improvement shows?  She was the epitome of a millennial consumer surrogate. Meanwhile, Kelly Menighan worked the heck out of the short hairdo for years, and never got a beauty contract.  TBH, her whole vibe gave Midwest suburbs, as interpreted through the eyes of a Manhattan costume department with a network budget for designer goods. She was definitely sophisticated given her limited access to shopping at Lisa's Boutique in Oakdale.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      This is mine!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Absolutely agree. Nicole's reaction to Ted, and Kat's reaction to Eva, will be interesting.
    • One tiny problem. Apparently she just inked a new deal. All it means, though, is that they will want to get some mileage out of her before they implement the DRW50 Master Plan. What do ya think? 6 months too short? 3 years def too long. A year and a half?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy