Jump to content

Y&R- Week of November 8th, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I notice that people always blame Hogan for the bad writing but Hammer, MAB and various 'ghost writers' all have a role here, too; in addition, the network is very involved in story and Bloom has clearly signed off on all this mess. Y&R is seriously starting to remind me of ATWT post-Hogan when Pissy and Goutman wrote the show. A lot of the stories are just silly but what bothers me most is that often the character's actions are devoid of motive and therefore fail to make sense. I keep watching this Cane 'drama' and can't help but wonder why he just doesn't go to Philip? It is only 5 million and the family is rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really not that conversant with Y&R's "bad writing". I only pointed out that "Hoganitis" the specific condition of not really delivering any "punch" during sweeps, seems to be affecting them now. What's happened this sweeps? Meggie got caught...the fallout from that is confined to Victor and Nikki really. Daisy came back...barely registers as a shock around town. That's it for "exciting" happenings around Genoa City, minus the catfight between Phyllis and Diane, which boiled down to Phyllis calling Diane a pyromaniac slut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed, Y&R ofte seems to produce it's best story during non-sweeps periods. The reveal on the baby switch/Sharron's and Ashley's collective unconscience dream might be a good example. PJ, I know you are a major Maura fan so what is your feeling on Daine being Carly with a new hair style? Here, and along with Blake 'Simon', I see Hogan falling into a ATWT time warp. Carly and Simon were both well-intentioned con artists with heart and I see nothing more than that going on here at Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pj, I agree with you about Kahlil's shoes. She's prancing around on these clunky stilettos.. I had a friend's sister who used to do that, she thought she was some freaking show horse or something. then one day, she stepped in as HUGE pile of goose poop with those shoes of hers, and I laughed till I peed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's the best job I've seen from one actress playing very similar roles. (I really defy anyone to compare Sarah Brown's roles and see any difference between them, besides the hair color.) I'm not saying that it's by any means perfect, but I see a minimum of tics, no nose wrinkling, no talking with the hands, she doesn't smooth her bangs over, she doesn't even say "Jack" the same way. (And I know I sound like a fangurl, so those who are chuckling at me, shame on you!)

I do sometimes feel like Diane is written the way Hogan wanted to write Carly, more cold-blooded and user-ish. I definitely think Blake is Simon (or his look-alike Donovan), but then again, it's a small role, and Leyden was probably brought in because they knew he could play it. I don't think Blake is well-intentioned at all.

I don't think the problem is Hogan falling into a time warp, I think it's always a "problem" revamping a character with a recast for a while. And I think in some respects, it's hard for the writers to write two strong women who will take no sh!t going at each other. I think it's extremely hard for them to write for Maura, when Phyllis plays such a dominant role on the show. No one reigns Stafford in at all.

I don't know if Diane's a little under-defined just because they're purposely trying to obscure her motives, or if TIIC just truly don't have a plan other than "letting Maura do what Maura does best."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since when would anyone other than the court system have a say in where Daisy gestates and delivers? Only in GC would a woman be given the option to keep her baby with her in prison after birth. The writers are so stupid and this story is totally ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy