Jump to content

AMC - Friday - Novermber 5, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well the entire episode did not only feature Ryan and Greenlee. Im sure many watched simply bc it was an older episode and featured characters no longer around. I know thats why I did, but honestly turned it off half way through bc the episode itself was boring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only zipped through it myself to see Maria/Edmund - even though I hated Edmund at the time. When the episodes are 5+ years older, I'll def. try to zip through them at least.

I always find it interesting that no matter what holiday/reason/episode... when ABC shows reruns, AMC ALWAYS beats OLTL and GH for that day by at least .2 in HH and 100,000 in viewers. Its amazing to me - it always happens.

Anyway, about Friday's episode, love love love Liza! The trial itself though - just ugh! I'm over it. And now we get to watch Rylee working together to try and save both their butts. Gag me and bring David back already.

Kind of cute that Jesse knows the sex but Angie doesn't, although you know this tiny little lie will turn into a huge argument for them two. If Jesse were actually wise, he would know his wife and realize he better come clean NOW.

And here starts the Cara storyline... everyone better be on their A-GAME for me or else Jake/RPG will ruin the entire thing for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LMAO, I love how you pinpoint RPG on ruining it as if there arent other people in the storyline that could ruin it as well. LOL...he tends to ruin things for me too. Wouldnt make much sense but Id love it if Cara and Amanda were the leads and his role was minimal. Jake is so freaking annoying these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ohhhh god , RPG better be on his game, it sucks that he's going to have Cara and Amanda fighting for him. Srsly :lol: keep his role minimal and if ever there was someone to create trouble or doubt in Frandi's RL I'd want it to be her, since they can get along at work and lead to Madison/Frankie scenes b/c he won't be able to talk to his wife. All in all please keep Jake's role minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha, I've just never been appalled and annoyed by an actor's prescence or style... and his character is one of the most hypocritical on the show. So it is just overall a horrible combination. I really want to like him though, especially given I like Amanda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy