Jump to content

AMC: Friday October 22, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I also though that both of their reactions was overboard.I could understand them reacting this way if David had done something that resulted in one of their family members/children dying or if he had raped Angie or one of their children.

Or terrorized/stalked Angie and bad stuff happened as a result of that. Or something along those lines.

IMO it would have made more sense if she had used the "I try to be a good Christian woman line, but I hate, hate hate him" for Tad's Uncle Robert. Who did way worse stuff to her and her family than David did. Or said something about how much she hated what Jesse did for abandoning her and Frankie.

And/or how much she hated that Rebecca had the life that she wanted with Jesse for almost 20 years. Her reacting the way she did yesterday to any of those things would have made more sense than to act that way about David.

But I think their reaction was OTT for what David did. The characters on the show are almost treating David like he was a Michael Cambias/Alexander Cambias Sr. type of villain and I don't think they should be doing that. But according to a lot of them he deserved to die, though I don't think he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I fully agree.

Especially with the fact that David was being treated as some kind of uber villain. He was a manipulator. Get over it. I mean, I understand how they all could be angry and even a little insecure because he was always able to outsmart them -- but then again, half of these hypocrites are idiots. Nevertheless, he saved so many thankless lives in Pine Valley, so the idea that "he deserved to die" in and of itself is a total hypocrisy. A man who saved the lives of many of the assholes in this town.

I love how all the good characters wish death upon people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

this is bigger than the writers or the actors. Frons wants them together so they will be together. McTavish, Pratt, B&E, Kreizman and Donna...doesnt matter who's writing bc as long as both actors are on the show, they will be together as long as Frons has a say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's so much more the story... It involves Frons giving RB what she wanted (working with VI) in order to get her back, and using the new head writers as scapegoats in order for Frons to get what he wanted (Rylee).

amc1022105.jpg

I love how she's blind as a bat, but still got a new weave. :unsure:

And there you have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It ain't like she put it in herself! :lol: At the risk of going WAY OT, I've wondered from time to time what goes into the wardrobe choices of famous blind musicians who've been blind for all or most of their lives. Like, what do they know from rhinestones and shimmer? :unsure: Just who makes these decisions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy