Jump to content

Next soap to fall?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

No soap will ever be canceled for the next five to ten years at least. In fact, 2012 will see a dramatic revival in the fortunes of daytime soaps. We will see glory years the likes of which have not been around since the 60s.

Zombie Irna Phillips says it will be so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have a feeling OLTL will definitely be next or it will be AMC. After one of them it's Days then B&B (if the international support has nothing to do with retainability). Y&R and GH will definitely have a showdown even though just by sheer numbers GH should go first, but GH has had a more cultural impact than any other soap so I think they just might be the last to go. Either way, we WILL be hearing about someone else's cancellation soon if these shows don't improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But if it's successful wouldn't more NBC affiliates jump on the bandwagon, and regardless NBC is still trying to do something with its daytime lineup that has been practically cut down to nothing but Days, I think this signifies a renewed interest in daytime. No I don't think NBC has a renewed interest in keeping Days forever, but more just to use its built audience to help out their other shows. It'll be gone in 2-3 years at the most IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to sound uncharacteristically like a Pollyanna, but what if -- just what if -- soaps actually rebounded? Like, just when the number of soaps still on the air couldn't get any lower (two, three at most), something miraculous happens, and one of the remaining shows actually takes off again? Some new character or storyline captures everyone's attention -- only, this time, it's for the right reasons. Then, network execs realize there might be life still left in the old gal.

I mean, a boy can still dream, right? ;-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I would think it'd be more complicated than that:

a.)Independently owned NBC affiliates want control over what THEY feel is best for their station, what will turn in the most profit, what their locals will enjoy. A lineup consisting of Real Housewives/Days/Access Live/Nate/Ellen might work in a bigger market, but in a smaller one, an NBC affiliate may already have a successful lineup with The Dr's and off-net sitcom reruns in the afternoon.

What works for one station might not work for every station.

b.) Other stations may already have long licenses/commitments to air the aforementioned programs on "The New NBC Daytime." For example, let's say an NBC affiliate in Mobile, Alabama wants to replicate what the network-owned stations are doing. If the ABC station in that market has a locked in deal with Ellen, the FOX station with Access Hollywood LIVE!, The CW station with Real Housewives, and the CBS affiliate with Nate Berkus, then how will that NBC affiliate be allowed to jump on the bandwagon? Said NBC affiliate may not be willing to fork over the licensing fee(or whatever) to replicate such a lineup.

Well, look at what happened after the gameshow wipeout of the 1990's. By around 1995-1998, there was only one gameshow on network television(Price), and two MAJOR shows in syndication(Wheel/Jeopardy). You had the cheesy dating shows(i.e. Bzzzz, the New Love Connection, New Dating/Newlywed Game, etc.), but real games of trivia, prizes, and smarts were far and few or were sacked in less than a year. GSN came along and really became a sort of beacon for that segment of the population that still enjoyed classic and new games.

Then Who Wants to be a Millionaire arrived the summer of 1999 and it forced everyone to really up-the-ante and to find that lightning in a bottle success. Game shows began to pop up in primetime and in syndication and even after GSN sold out to poker, there has still been a huge demand for game shows and game show content.

Daily serials(or multiple installments per week) can rebound...they just need a breather period before someone ups and invests in the genre again in a big way that will make soap fans and those who are not astute, true blue fans get up and pay attention. After all, the pricetag for a soap per week is still way cheaper than your standard Law and Order or CSI. There have been many attempts to revive interest in the genre over the years, but either they sucked really bad or if they were marginally interesting, the daytime press never put its interest or support behind it.

It's gonna have to be something bigger than a Soap Opera Digest cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This reminds me of what Justin Deas (ex-Buzz, GL; ex-Keith, SANTA BARBARA; ex-Tom, ATWT) told TV Guide's Michael Logan:

"If the soaps all go off the air, some smart person is going to figure out the right way to do it and bring ’em back. But they’ll have to rethink the form and make it bolder. I mean, we in America still haven’t gotten over our sex hang-ups! The lesbians on our show can’t kiss? What’s wrong with us?"

I'm with you, bellcurve, and I'm with Deas: soaps could rebound, but TPTB have to rethink the stories they tell (if not the way they actually tell them). There's something wrong when it's 2010, some girl on a soap opera is crying WTD?, and Maury Povich isn't even around to read the DNA results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There are details through the thread, but yes, as mentioned, she hated Ellen Wheeler, and lambasted her for crying a lot, for her decisions with firing and Peapack, etc. Back in the day she also hated Pam Long, who created Reva and gave Reva all of her best material. The producers or writers she liked most seemed to be those who saw Reva in the most generic of molds, although she likely doesn't see it that way.
    • Cali was the only Paulina for me on AW.  Was Judi Evans such a “name” that Cali was fired for her?  Judi basically played an entirely different character.  She could’ve been Nancy!
    • They were great together. Barbara was way too high maintenance for any man. You know Henry divorced her a$$ after about a year.  And, here’s an example of what I was talking about…
    • I watch every day as well, and I am enjoying the show. There's always room for improvement. TBH, things are much different from what I expected reading the character breakdowns. That could be a good thing! I'm willing to let them find their groove and figure out what kind of show it wants to be. The core and underlying theme. -I echo what a few others have said: The show is lacking in real romance and cross-starred lovers. But that tracks from (MVJ) experience cause the bell soaps are not good with romance IMO. -I have a feeling it's being built before our eyes, but we're missing that rival family. -I would prefer more variety of storylines. Good ones that could weave together the whole town.   -I struggle connecting to the male characters. So I hope they get a clear handle on them soon. Most of them feel underwritten and one-note. -Find a better purpose for Naomi. I fear she will be the first Dupree dumped. I completely agree. June's story does nothing for me. And what if she turns out to be Tyrell and Samantha's mom? They are very close to leaving high school. why should I care? If she turns out to be related to Hayley also, what's the long-term story, and why should I care? I believe Hayley can work on her own as a vixen. Does she need a sounding board? Sure, but you can accomplish that with an outsider's friend group. I didn't think I would be saying this, but I would entertain Kat having a forbidden affair with Jacob. Both Naomi and Jacob need something to do other than case-of-the-month storylines. 
    • That would really just be a redux of the Leslie/Eva story. I really hope they don't go there. My guess for the storyline with Anita that we have "never seen before on daytime" is that it may be a "me, too" story. Anita did unspeakable things to get ahead because of some disgusting producer, and the other person she left behind was a boyfriend who cared about her very much.
    • Reva and Zimmer needed strong adversaries/scene partners. It would dampen the negatives associated with the character and Zimmer's self-admitted excesses. I think that's why she was a bust on SB. I don't know how she did on her return to OLTL because I was not watching at that point. The problem for me with Reva is the same situation with Erica Kane. It ended up being variations of the same storyline year after year. I think if the show had truly broken up Reva and Josh and put them in other viable relationships it would have freed up the characters to have better storylines and character growth. Instead, it's as if the characters were stuck for decades.
    • I am still behind and know what upcoming week you are talking about.

      Please register in order to view this content

       And I know I'm not ready and have not been since the official news. That was my first couple on that show. You won't be alone.    When you put it like that...same. Like I say in the thread when I'm more interested in what people are wearing than the stories...red flag. No momentum. Just stalling.      lol.
    • Y&R: 10% good, 90% garbage time BtG: 90% good, 10% garbage time
    • Valid question. Decades ago I didn't understand how this works, but then I learned.  But I never saw her as a romantic lead anyhow. I still dislike rapist Chelsea on Y&R.  And that show pairing her with her victim was just awful.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy