Jump to content

Dark Shadows - The Movie


Marco Dane

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I kinda want to see this but it is making a mockery of the original show. Just imagine if they made OLTL or AMC a comedy movie about 20 or 30 years from now SMH. Viki/Niki as a comedic plot instead of Oscar worthy drama shutter to think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sadly I think the last few years of OLTL already took care of that.

It's about what I expected - Tim Burton and Johnny Depp defecating on themselves and fliging their product at the screen. Two hacks ruining a fun show. No thanks.

Tim Burton movies always seem to get the same reaction, although critics have lost interest over the years (they were not fond of that Alice in Wonderland bastardization). I do wonder if this will get any box office. This is going to be alien to most viewers, and treating it as a joke will just lose more interest. Like his old flop Mars Attacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not even a mockery of the show--I hate to sound like a comic book fanboy but WHY BOTHER. As with Alice, just invent your own fantay and go with it. You could so easily do a vamnpire comes to terms with modern culture movie set in the 60s

I think even his fans have--as you said by the comments on the webpage. It's so lazy. And he has HUGE talent as a filmaker--I'll never deny him that. But since Sleepy Hollow (at least) has largely been re-using the same things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw the trailer and it looks like it's going to be great.

I've seen every Dark Shadows episode and lets face it, it was a comedy, albeit not intended to be. From the trailer, I like the direction they are going and I'm hoping the movie is a fun ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was some camp, but there were some very strong, serious moments.

I think camp that works is camp which isn't intentional. This type of forced camp is very hard to do. The only person who used to make it work was John Waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The campiness was a HUGE part of the appeal of the series, and any fan who denies that is, IMHO, well in denial. But this is simple, obvious comedy. I would have been impressed if Burton had managed to capture the campy quality in a movie that took itself more seriously. As it stands this could be ANY product--why bother using Dark Shadows and its characters? Burton was at his best (way way way back) when he worked on his own creations--maybe he should go back to that. It's completely lazy.

I would argue this isn't even camp. It's flat out comedy, which is pretty different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I thought it was great and paid homage to the original series in many different surprising ways. The Laura story, Quentin, Maggie Evans and so many other things were integrated which surprised me. Also the cameo with the original stars was extremely brief, but so touching. I wish they'd made Lara Parker or Kathryn Leigh Scott Mrs. Johnson or something. I LOVED Carolyn and David in this film and the actress playing Victoria was perfect. The only real letdown was the ending, which felt rushed.

Another thing--the film is NOT a comedy at all. The only comedic bits are whats featured in the trailer. Beyond that it's mostly played straight and the family is pretty dark and complicated. Michelle Pheiffer is a surprising delight and very powerful force as Elizabeth. I think had they come up with a better marketing plan this could've been a huge franchise. It's a shame it'll end up as a stand alone film because they set up a lot of future films well. Whoever decided to market as a comedy needs to be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I refuse to pay to see it. This is how a good friend, whose opinion I trust but has NOT watched the show, said it went (he also said the group of guys he saw it with, two of whom didn't even know there was a tv show, hated it):

I saw it this morning and really was disappointed. The trailer/commercials had significantly lowered my expectations, but I didn't think it would be as bad as it was.

The have gutted the property of anything that made the show endearing. It is Dark Shadows in name only. There is no connective tissue, other than character names, to tie this to the source material.

Aside from that it's just a poorly constructed film. It starts out as Victoria's story, but quickly drops her once Barnabas is introduced. There is almost no plot. It's basically a series of jokes about how Barnabas is shocked by life in the 70s. We've seen this story many times before, and done much better. Plus it has little to do with the Dark Shadows brand I suspect. This isn't even a fun spoof like The Brady Bunch movie. I was happy for it to be over.

On Metacritic the reviews seem to run the gamut--the New York Times loved it, yet sent out one of their C level critics for some reason, not Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy