Jump to content

AMC: Friday June 25, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It was a near perfect episode that has put me in the awkward position of being grateful to ABC for something. All those brown people and all of them EXCELLENT actors, and everything else you mention, the directing, the dialogue. That scene where Jesse told Frankie about the pregnancy scare and Frankie looked freaked and just a teeny bit grossed out. They gave good material to actors who could handle it and it worked. Which begs the question: what storage unit do they have Frons locked up in? Because, seriously, you KNOW there's no way he greenlighted this. This was a Frons free episode. What's going on over at AMC that's so different from the other two shows on ABC's lineup?

ETA: The only drawback is that this jewel of an episode was on a Friday when ratings are usually the lowest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A rare event on an ABC soap.

AMC does seem out of step with the other two ABC soaps. It is a real soap. I can't help wondering if this is good or bad from the network's perspective. Does this mean that ABC is giving the new team leeway to turn the demos around? Or does this mean that ABC isn't interested in AMC any more? Maybe Frons is just distracted by GH, Vanessa, and Franco. Whatever it is AMC is benefiting so it is all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure about that. With Erica and Jack about to go on vacation the show might be willing to risk letting the Hubbards act as temporary lead characters and hope that the audience doesn't revolt too much before they can bring Kendall back.

(Please read the above statement with maximum allowable sarcasm and derision.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The two best in their class on my birthday. :D

Thanks!

Thanks! ;) Right back at you.

I stated in another thread that I want All My Children to win in writing because I want to see Agnes hit Pratt over the head with the statuette.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And this is the problem.

The Hubbards & even David could work if Daytime wasn't so plot focused.

If AMC let The Hubbards be The Hubbards & not the latest characters that do extremely OOC stuff to facilitate the propping of agenda driven characters the show would be fine.

The same with David.

It's not necessary that he ALWAYS scheme or ALWAYS have a "justified" vendetta where all other characters (including his) logic & morals are compromised to keep him on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the hands of skilled writers, Angie's story and David's story would be on a collision course with each other and not in the usual "David saves the day" kind of way. His little speech about "protect yourself first" was more telling about HIS worldview than anything and the fact that this disease is Angie's consequence for failing to do that shows the flaw in HERS.

Also kudos to the show for giving Angie a real disease so we don't have to put up with weeks and months of talk about some vague, unnamed "condition" or "infection."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

Soaps need plot but sacrificing characters for them leads to stuff like Rape The Lesbian, The Baby Switch That Wouldn't End, The Unabortion & Madden In A Box.

Look at how many characters barely recovered (or still have yet to) from The Baby Switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not fond of blindness storylines because like I said I don't want this to end at Christmas where Angie is having a conversation with Fr. Clarence and then poof she's cured.

But I will take this story over anything McTavish would've written. Angie probably would've been raped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy