Jump to content

March 8-12, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I thought they were already dark on Fridays and one week every 2 months. There is only so much they can cut back and they keep bringing new actors on. They have to cut there at some point and Jason Cook and the actor who plays Ethan are hardly going to make a dent in anything. JJ's return cost them, I suspect GV was in the middle of a contract cycle when he was let go and they had to pay that. They should really cut 2 big salaried people. Sarah Brown got axed probably to accomodate JJ to an extent.

Steve, Mo, and Tony are not going anywhere. And no way are they cutting anyone in the mob.

I know people won't like it but I don't see them cutting the Spencers, but I could see Robin and Patrick going away after this storyline ends. What purpose do the Cassadines serve or even the Q's at this point(aside from the fact that they have a couple of returns/new characters tied to them now).

The cast is too big and they just keep hiring people. I really would love to know why Reeves got a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You know they can't get rid of the Cassadines - Valentin is on the way! And his cousin, Halloween, played by Steve Richard Harris.

All this about how JJ's return would liven up the Cassadine/Spencer family and Liz/Lucky and the Spencers and it's all a big bust. Liz in one of the worst written stories of all time, yet another WTD, yet another paternity saga, Helena's actions so baffling even the actions can't explain it, and yet another "comedy" caper for Luke.

I know it won't happen but I think GH could cut Luke, Nik, Lucky, and Liz with no big losses. Since Lulu seems more popular now that she's clinging to Dante, I guess she would stay around.

Isn't he BFF with Steve Burton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Valentini, Halloweeni, etc.. bring them on.

I haven't watched GH but the Cassadines have been a joke for years now since they turned Stefan into a murderer. I've never like Liz so I could care less about another WTD story plus I've never cared for the Spencers aside from Laura who's not even around. And why would JJ's return impact the Cassadines at all. Was Lucky the character not on canvas. Now bring back Stefan and that means something. He seems to be more involved with Jason and the mob than anything else now.

They focus too much on keeping popular characters versus keeping families on canvas together and interacting. Why is Jason still around as a character. he never interacts with family. Why is Nikolas around there hasn't been a Cassadine story since Stefan left canvas. If they want to focus on the Spencers, bring back Laura. And the Q's? I don't give a flying flip about Skye a non real Q or any of the Wards. The only good news is Brooklyn is returning. And will Luke be dressing up as Professor what's his name with Skye coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Spinelli is a joke. He should be dumped tomorrow.

I would keep Liz and Lucky, but they would never be a couple again. Luke, Nik, and Lulu have got to go.

I don't know why they re-signed Robin and Patrick, maybe they want to keep up the pretense about the hospital. Reeves is Burton's BFF, but they haven't given him anything to do since he got that contract. Jason Cook, Nathan Parsons, and Tyler Christopher won't be missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Frons has some obsession with DAYS actors?

That would explain why Jason Cook has been wondering around with no storyline for 2 [!@#$%^&*] years!

GH (realistically) needs to dump

Jason Cook

Bradford Anderson

Nathon Parsons

Ingo Radhemacher (SO tired of Carly and Jax's breakups.)

There are others, but I am blanking on them right now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

same here. I wish ABC would have the balls and do a Days style move here by getting rid of them. They are probably the 3 most paid on the show yet add absoluetly nothing to the soap. All are hasbeens who's characters have nothing left to offer. Its the same basic rinse, wash repeat cycle with them. Getting rid of them would force GH to go in a new direction, one which would be a very welcomed and necesary change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see what purpose Liz serves without Lucky. She serves no purpose unless she's part of the Spencer family. Nathan Parsons is probably considered part of the resurgence of the Spencers(make me gag). Jason Cook should have been let go ages ago. Tyler don't get me started, he's provided zero value for years now at I'm sure a big pricetag. Jason thompson, the character of Patrick I think has lost his appeal. And Kimberly McCullough should go off and pursue directing. GH won't ever give her the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its not a "matter of cutting" its a matter of writing. Even after they "cut they still have Guza"

Cut Guza IMO definitely cut Luke, he sort of just in and out with characters chanting how he's missing...the papa is a rolling stone is old.

Tyler could stay but they won't write Nikolas as compelling as he could/should be they just won't do it...so they bring in Helena and for what?

The same old paternity switch while he seems oblivous that his psycho granny would tamper with this situation (like she always does) he moves her in...where there was a time he wouldn't have anything to do with her....the writing sucks,

Jason Cook hasn't been in a major storyline "of his own in two years"

IA they keep adding on to the hospital end but then they won't write good hospital storylines...so? Now here comes Maya...

NO WOMAN SERVES A PURPOSE ON GH WITHOUT A MAN :lol: I can name about 5 others in the same boat if they wrote women to "drive story they could" she has plenty of purpose as a Webber like Robin, full of history on her own and core (family wise) but look how they write her...

IMO Elizabeth has more purpose than most. But they won't write FOR HER they write AGAINST her loading her down with babies, and triangles...eg Alexis, Carly. GH only write male driven storylines so no woman has a purpose other to be attached to some man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's mind boggling to me is how the show has no money yet continues to operate. Same as AMC I would assume. And OLTL the only show operating within a budget is forced to cut more people. What gives. Who is footing the bill for the overruns at GH and AMC? OLTL and The View?

Of course ABC as a whole is a mess. The disaster at NBC this year took eyes off ABC but their primetime shows aren't doing that well anymore and are dropping. Their viewer loss in in line with NBC's yet no one is talking about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy