Jump to content

The Sud's Report 3/12/10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Umm...it wasn't Kish that brought down the ratings. I will admit the whole Amelia and Dorain wedding was absurd. I felt it was a pure mockery. It really put me off and really cheapened the whole gays and lesbians are marrying in Lanview storyline. But that story was months ago. I think the downfall was the whole Gigi/Rex s h i t that has been going on and on and on and on. Add the awful Mitch story and the affects of it and boom....you have shitty ratings for the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Right, I read that this week too, somethng like 45(!) episodes this season. Degrassi has always been a random viewing experience in our home, the syndication eps seem to bounce all over the place but we've finally started getting the DVDs to cover all of our bases. We have a long way to go, about to start S4 straight through. How many seasons ago did Emma and them go to college and the girl with the daughter sleeps with the hockey player to book the commercial? That's the "latest" we've caught.

:lol: Somebody had to say it!

There were moments with Mitch where I was embarrassed to be a soap fan and thankful to be watching alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I know! That's just what apparantly Frank thinks. While I wasn't a big fan of a Gay Marriage story and can see them getting backlash, but this whole "lets throw the baby out with the bathwater"mentality is absurd. I don't know if anyone has read the ABC press realease, but the whole thing is spin. I'm pissed that in the same announcement that one of only two gay couples are leaving that they also say Kish resonated with fans and the audience, was ground breaking, they won awards. Okay so then why are you ditching them if all that is true? Makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was 48 episodes, and they'll be two-parters, so in the end, there'll be 24 hour-long stories throughout.

I never quite understood the syndication package. It was on here for a few years, and they always started with S3 (in particular, Marco's coming out 2-parter) and stopped at the very end of S5. They always aired the eps in order, but I know different markets showed it differently. We got it stripped in daytime, but some other places have Sunday morning marathons and stuff like that. Emma and them graduated at the end of S7, which was in spring 2008, but since they completely screwed the show's timeline up with seasons six, seven, eight, and nine, they were the class of 2007 graduating in 2008. If that's the latest you've seen, then you're in for either a pleasant surprise or an utter shock as seasons eight and nine basically revolve around newbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a real double standard because Gigi and Rex have been in so many unpopular stories, Todd has not been in a popular story since the rapemance, John has been a flop with various women for years, yet they are going nowhere. I certainly understand why some fans didn't love their role in the baby story or in the farcical gay wedding story because I didn't either, I thought they should have been more built up on their own, not put in the Nick and gay wedding stuff. But I also think the show was trying to tie them more into the overall canvas. They almost never had a story to stand out on their own, and now they never will. So the lesson is apparently they should have been put on their own from the start.

I thought we might at least get until the end of the year.

And what I really hate is that we have seen them specifically blamed for ratings losses and now we are seeing someone drag their names through the mud in the press. Say what you will about ATWT and how they mishandled Nuke but I never saw anyone saying Nuke got ATWT canceled, they were not dumped after less than a year, and no one went around to Branco talking crap about the actors.

It's a very demoralizing moment because hey, look, how groundbreaking, but psst, they almost killed the show and one of them, we'll let you guess who, is a party boy lazy bum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When they aired the show he's a talking head on, Planet Soap, I didn't even recognize him!! LOL he looks very very little like the photos he uses.

(I never got into Degrassi TNG and sorta wish I had--I'll be interested to see the new look of the show with the lower budget).

The OLTL cast recently has taken to going on, on sites like WeLoveSoaps, about how the diversity and range of stories is what makes their show different and unique bla bla. Which is all good and well but with the characters being removed (mainly Kish but others too) who are being removed, very little of that uniqueness will stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think its a brilliant idea. If they get a good cast of characters they can pull it off. The show started to go down after season 6 but i do feel this last season was just as good as 6 and better than 1 & 2. But then again im older now. when i was 14 and they were 14 i could ~relate~ lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that Gina was supposed to be given the role of Victoria not Heather. If Maria and co. didn't like Vail, why didn't they get rid of Heather and bring her back with a recast? It's not like they were using her heavily. I know Vail Bloom is no acting goddess but this makes it seem like tptb thought that Vail Bloom was worse than Yvone Zima.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly Carl. I hate to sound so over the top--but I honestly kinda do feel that having the characters written off in LESS than a year--making NO real attempt to integrate them into the canvas of the show (Hell, AMC did a better job at that with Kevin back in '97--granted they never wouldhave given him a kiss let alone a love scene), etc, for me really does negate a LOT of the good they did do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show?
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: Felicia started out as camp bitch on a very dreary show (with Cecile being the only somewhat fun character around that point) and then got into a lot of comedy. Some of the comedy was very stupid, but many viewers still felt drawn to it, to Lily, Cecile, Cass, Felicia, Kathleen, Wallingford. There was a vibrancy which Dano fit well in, her fashions and melodrama parodied in a gentle way. This was missing in some of the long-suffering parts she'd had had on shows like ATWT. By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy