Jump to content

AMC: Brief SOD Spoilers


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As much as actors have mentioned her and praised her in the press recently, I do doubt we'll be getting an interview with her. For one, while she has been accessible, she has never been eager to constantly talk to the press like, say, Pratt and McTavish have historically been. My take is that she's not interested in the exposure. But beyond that, I doubt ABC wants her speaking for the show. As so many have said, they don't want viewers to get used to the idea that she's leading the team. They want us "ready to embrace" Kreizman & Swajeski when they arrive.

I would LOVE to, maybe one day in the future, hear Broderick's take on what her experience has been behind the scenes. When you consider that she has now twice passed on being AMC's head writer (at least in the permanent sense), it makes you curious even more. Most daytime writers are so open about their eagerness to "receive glory" for "saving the show" that "they know better than any other" - even in spite of repeated failure (see the 5x-fired McTavish). But LB was like, "awww HELL NO!" .... "Okay, I'll come back to help clean up this mess, but I aint workin' for YOU and falling under the bus for YOUR crap." (Sorry, just my Lorraine-with-attitude fantasy there!)

Okay, that element I can understand. I was speaking more in terms of, irreversible damage and monumentally offensive as the unabortion story came off (case in point, if Erica had to have a son, it would have been FAR more preferable to have him be Kendall's long-lost-and-forgotten twin).

As a catalyst, the Adam story may turn out lame. But I doubt it would ever rise to those levels of disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, I know. That is what I was saying. I do not expect her to give it. Absolutely no. Even if she wanted, I think Frons would sanction it. The interview is not the only way to know for sure something came from her, but would be an excellent and widely available source to which to link to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't say I wasn't a fan of hers. I think she did some incredible work in her 86-89 solo stint (well, 86-87 as co-HW with Wisner). Yes, there were some major clunkers, most notably the whole Silver/Damon thing, but overall her stories were incredibly strong. My biggest problem with that stint is that there were so many stories. Front burner stories rarely appeared more than 3x a week, and because there were so many stories going on simultaneously, there wasn't much crossover and there were glaring day-to-day continuity issues. I wonder how much of that was then-EP Steve Schenkel's influence. But most of her stories were truly riveting and smartly written. There's also a warmth to her writing that she definitely inherited from Agnes and Wisner. That was a great time for the show. I loved, loved, loved the early part of her second go-around--under FMB. Janet/Pierce/Laura, Laurel/Trevor/Mike Delaney, Liza/Tad (for the most part), the teens. Everything just came together beautifully. Again, just smartly and warmly written for the most part. I wasn't so hot for the storytelling under Francesca James, but again, don't know how much of that was James or even Disney, which took over ABC at the same time James stepped up. She sounds like a very smart, savvy lady who cares about the genre and who doesn't just phone in her storylines and just collect a check. Like I wrote above, maybe this Miguel thing will come off better than it sounds on paper. After all, we don't know much about it just yet. Plus, this could still be the tail end of Pratt's writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's a wonderful post LoyaltoAMC! While I am way to young to remeber her first stint in the late 80's, the way you describe her is exactly how I feel about Lorraine based off of her 1995-97 stint. She has a flaws like anyone, but she does possess warmth and really writes women well. I mean, Erica/Janet/Skye was AMAZING. There has been such misogyny on AMC for many years. Not many strong women over the past 5 or 6 years, but already we are seeing that feminist angle that Broderick loves so much in Greenlee. Greenlee is taking charge and isan't being written as this poor little victim that needs to be saved by a man.... Someone shoulsd give Cam Mathison that memo ;) She gets AMC and what it is all about. Miguel sounds bad yes and I expect it to be very bad (but I have been conditioned to feel that way). If it proves to be bad, well then yes Lorraine will take a hit.... but my guess it will come off 10 times better than it would under Pratt, B&E's or McTavish's troubled pens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's how Sylph feels about everything people enjoy. Except, of course, the last three seasons of Alias or any of the other JJ Abrams shows that fall apart when forced to make sense. Those are golden. Only JJ and Sylph understand quality entertainment. But the real question is, why won't JJ call him back?!

Do not expect an answer from Sylph as to how to combat cynicism or what should be done about daytime. His only answer to daytime is no answer and a scorched earth policy. The implicit theme of his collected works is that anyone who thinks daytime can or should be salvaged is a naive fool. Not like him. And JJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC used to have a character back in 2003 named Carlos Reyes from Argentina or something, he was the handyman at Fusion who dated Greenlee (she was using him). Juan Pablo was his brother and I remember him coming to protect Carlos from the Argentinian mob. I remember Carlos died in late 2003 after one of the nurses turned out to be from the Mob and implanted something into his chest, which Edmund discovered far after he died.

Well my point is LOL, the woman Adam is asking Tad to finds name is Sonya Reyes, she's the mother of Miguel, and I think she might also be the mother of Carlos and Juan Pablo, or she might have some other relation to them. Carlos also used to work at The Chandler Gallery before he worked at Fusion, to..do you think there is a connection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy