Jump to content

Y&R: Some Spumors From Soap Central


Evan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Adam/Sharon become much closer.

Adam goes completely blind!

Sharon is there for Adam, and Nick isn't happy.

Nina and Paul make love.

Paul's fake relationship with Jill isn't fake for much longer.

Paul is torn between Jill and Nina.

Patty/MJ is out to get revenge on Jack, and Dr Petersen is in the firing line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, I've been in favor of this from the beginning, so it's no problem for me. But I somehow wonder if Ashley is going to be a part of this triangle too? If not, I'm happy if Adam just works with Ash to take over Chancellor.

Honestly, it's all a little rushed, but I have no complaints. Paul had been integrated with the Newmans, but with most of the Newmans off the canvas, that wasn't looking good. So, too, the Williams clan ain't coming back (see below). With Carolyn Conwell too ill to continue in her role as Mary, Corbin Bernsen (probably) too expensive to bring back regularly as Todd, and nary a mention of Steve...that family is gone for good. Plus...

...it seems to me at the end of this, Patty will be dead.

In the short term, it seems clear that Patty will somehow trade places with Dr. Emily and then masquerade as her...and nobody will believe Emily is Emily.

But in the conclusion of all of this, it seems likely to me that Patty will be killed. (Maybe she'll disappear, but I hope not). Then, Emily will ascend to her role as the new talk-two and romantic plaything of the over-40 men. I enjoy Haiduk, but I wonder if the role is sustainable...unconnected to everyone else on the canvas.

ETA: The thing of beauty in the Nina-Paul-Jill triangle is the Nina-Jill dynamic. Seeing these two divas at each other's throats over a man...heavenly! I hope that turns into a real story, instead of the comedic-beat of the week.

And if a deranged Cricket does return to town...won't she just love Nina and Paul together!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paul isn't the man I'd want for Jill, but I'd accept it if the storyline actually got screentime. It's not a terrible idea and if it were well developed it could be very interesting. Unfortunately it won't be properly developed so it won't work. Jill is such a hated character by the writers I dread to see how she will be portrayed. She doesn't get to be smart or sexy and she has no power. It's sick what they've done to Jill Abbott. A waste of such a complex character. More interesting than her counterparts (Jack and Victor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657  
    • The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth.  That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL
    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy