Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week October 19


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Is it just me, or were all of Tom's literary references a *bit* precious? Do we have that to look forward to in every scene he's in? Cuz that could get real old real fast, a cute character quirk, but go easy on it OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I do have a MAJOR problem with the fact that Todd's new daughter is older than Jack. Sometimes, I wish the writers would do just follow timelines and history. Dani does seem like a firecracker, very much like her parents. I was kind of hoping there would be more of a question of her paterntity - but it's already been decided she's Todd's child.

Can't root for Todd and Blair in this situation. Blair is being completely pathetic, lying to Todd about Tea/Ross "trying to take his money." How does Todd fall for this, everytime? I guess I shouldn't have to ask that question, haha...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Todd falls for this because they have to make him the victim in the storyline.

Todd and Tea seem more prone to bouts of blank facial expressions or weeping than firecracker status, at least to me. Tea does like to rant in court but underneath is the usual martyr/victim, and Todd, at heart, is the same.

I think it would be more interesting if this girl was sheltered and then when she came to Llanview, began to act out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes Danielle shouldn't be older than Jack, but I'm still looking forward to the fallout. On soaps you can't really do much with prepubescent kids in that 9-13 year old range. They're too old to be precious but too young to date, so they instead spend a lot of time playing video games and clinging to their parents asking a bunch of questions. Danielle's age is weird, but it'll provide more storyline opportunity than if they had made her younger than Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Starr's best stories were when she was in that age range. GL also told solid stories in the 90s with kids in that age range.

I think they should have brought in a child Tea gave away for adoption BEFORE she met Todd. That would create a lot of conflict, because this was a part of Tea's life Todd knew nothing about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do you guys think Jack is the next to be SORAS'd by around next summer, or do you think they'll hold on to Carmen a la K&EA? I'm not saying that they should keep a sucky young actor (not that he's sucky) out of sentimentality, but I think that's one of OLTL's endearing little qualities, getting to watch kids grow up in their roles. I guess it kinda started with Erin Torpey, though she wasn't quite as young as the Aldersons.

Well Todd, you've got yourself a little dynasty, now dontcha? Todd Manning has FOUR children folks, four kiddies to keep him relevant for years to come. Thank God they haven't pulled this with Ryan over at AMC, but I'm not complaining, I actually like Todd when the writing is in his favor and I love the Lords, so...

We were watching a dvd the other day, and in one of the previews there was a movie TSJ stars in, it must have been from about ten years ago, younger, fuller faced, blonder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Greenlee being barren is one reason he doesn't have more kids. Good thing, as something tells me her child would kill their parents at birth, like Thanos.

The writers have done so much to cause huge rifts between the Lords, then they don't follow up on it, so there's always some unspoken awkwardness in their scenes.

I wish they could bring Tina back, recast if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: I had almost forgotten that she's coming back.

You know, and I'm not threadjacking here, but I think it's sad that I find a convicted rapist more likeable than Ryan Lavery. I'm not minimizing Todd's dirty deeds, and believe me, he has annoyed the hell outta me plenty, but there's something to be said for personality... being annoyed by a character not based on what they've done, but purely on who they are/how they act. Some people just grate on your nerves and you can't quite put your finger on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, Todd doesn't go around screaming at people and flaring his nostrils in every scene, occasionally interspersed with angry whispering and bug-eyed stares of death. He also doesn't get storylines with such timeless dialogue as "They cut out the bad" and "I AM THAT MONSTER", although I might not want to give OLTL any ideas for the next sweeps period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They killed Jim off after a few years, but for the time he was there, he was seen as a loving father, and was remembered as that afterwards. There was no adoptive mother on the show but Susan did remember her and that was some conflict with Harley.

It was only when she returned, de-aged by about five years and with her birth name, that they forgot about her adoptive parents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dislike OLTL's penchant for hiring child actors and keeping them for the long haul. Not only is it tedious to watch them slowly grow up, but the audience tends to have a hard time accepting them in more mature situations as they age because the image/perception of the child they once were still lingers in their minds. Starr and Matthew both should have been SORAS'd with older actors years ago. I don't think any child actor on a soap should last longer than five years. I'm fine with the current Jack for the time being, but next year they should age him into his middle teens. Sam needs to be SORAS'd too. He was born a few months before Bree, but while she is like five or six, he's still being presented as about three years old and doesn't talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy