Jump to content

GH: James Franco Joins The Cast


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

A list in terms of star status. I know him because I'm a comic nerd and think he's hot. But I imagine most people don't know his name at all. When I think A list I think Brad, Angelina, George, Tom (Hanks or Cruise), Julia, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he is a lot more hip than those old fogies. He does mainstream stuff like spiderman but has that artistic cred from Milk, and now he is gracing magazine covers and whatnot and according to IMDB he has 3 or 4 movies coming out next year with some really current stars. Tom Hanks is 60 years old. Brangelina are of course beyond A List Emeritus, but they satisfy their quirky edges in other ways. I had to actually think for a moment who George was that you were talking about. James Franco is working with everyone from Tina Fey to Natalie Portman to, yes, Julia Roberts and Javier Bardem. If he isn't officially A list he will be in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My head is still spinning over this -- although less than yesterday.

I don't know if actors (apart from the recognizeable Clooneys, Pitts and Jolies of this world) can be classified as properly A or B-list anymore. There are those who are famous, there are those who are up-and-coming, there are those who have a lot of buzz behind them. Franco, I think, is somewhere in the second or third category. I mean, when was the last time a movie star with cachet came on a Daytime soap? Excluding reality "stars", sport stars and Big P***y from The Sopranos?

Am taking this opportunity to introduce my new avatar: Carly and her new love interest. CarFranco?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Aside from Julia Roberts, years ago, most of those people aren't that famous. Tina is because of the Sarah Palin impression more than anything else.

Artistic cred is great but the very message of Milk is rendered a laughingstock on a soap where homosexuality does not exist and guns are the awesomeness of awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking about this. Franco has chosen to go on the one of the soaps that has absolutely no diversity beyond tokenism and stereotypes and promotes gun violence. Guza and Phelps had GH's only gay character disappear into thin air. There has not been one gay character since. We have an African American president and there is no ethnic diversity on GH. Even B&B has a couple of regular African American characters now. The casual gun violence and use on GH is a whole other story. It goes to show that either Franco has no clue about these issues or he doesn't not care enough to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Doesn't he share an agent with Steve Burton or something?

But yes, I wonder how many of his fans really want to sit through thug worship.

I almost wish someone would do a comparison video of the murder of Harvey Milk in the film, and the sleazy gun porn that GH revels in. Remember how often GH used to do those looooong, sloooooow montages of Jason surviving a hail of bullets and then nailing the "bad" mobsters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
But really, does ANY soap have diversity? Well, there's AMC. But look at Y&R! Lily White. ATWT? If you don't look like Marie Wilson or Noelle Beck, there's no story for you.

For whatever reason he decided to do this(whether it be school, film research, wanting a new, weird experience, or supporting a coke habit), I think James Franco just picked a show that was iconic and had pop culture resonance. I can't blame him for that. It's not like anyone would have watched him in Oakdale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL has diversity. It has more African American, Latin and gay characters than all the other soaps. I was merely making the point that he could have chosen a soap with diversity. He obviously doesn't care which means that he certainly isn't cerebral as he tries to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy