Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
SON Community Back Online

Y&R: Fire Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, Scott Hamner, and Paul Rauch

  • Member

It's time, they've had a little over a year and the past 4-6 months have been horrible...

For months Y&R has been heading down a damaging and convoluted path of inane, poorly paced, poorly executed storyline that goes against the grain of the show's history and against the grain of basic soap opera. Very little makes sense, almost everything is rushed, which leads to little to no real aftermath or emotional resonance. Everything feels hollow, characters are unrecognizable, stories are going nowhere, ratings are generally stagnant in the lower region of the poll. Needless to say, something must be done to save American's #1 daytime drama. Getting rid of Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, Scott Hamner, and Paul Rauch and replacing them with perhaps a singular Head Writer and a seperate Executive Producer with a much better and proven track record would be .

Today's show, the 9/17/09 US episode was rock bottom for a lot of us. It simply highlighted everything that is wrong with Y&R and the current writing and producing regime in charge of running the show (and IMO, into the ground). A core character, Colleen Carlton, was killed off for no meaningful reason, other than to create "shock" which is of course a very temporary high. Unlike the death of fellow next generation character Cassie Newman, Colleen's death had no sufficient build up, nor were her connections to her family even explored sufficiently in the months/weeks leading up to her senseless and overtly plot-driven death. Had that happened, maybe the emotional resonance of the story would have been better projected, instead, they killed off a next generation character with ties to a lot on the canvas that had unlimited possibilities as a character, just for shock. Victor and Jack's feud already had a lot available to reignite it in a big way, from the runification of Ashley (which I'll get into a bit later) to the Patty Williams fiasco. So again, what was the use of killing this character, core character mind you, off? Granted the actress playing her was pretty polarizing, but not like they even attempted to write anything sufficient and long-term for her. Not to mention, the Colleen stuff on today's US episode FAILED MASSIVELY from a production standpoint.

Which leads me to another problem that has been plaguing this show - the horribly misogynistic writing for women. Since the beginning of this writing regime consisting of Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, and Scott Hamner, women have been written as idiots who see themselves as inferior without a man (like Phyllis and Sharon in relation to Nick, Gloria in relation to Jeffrey, Chloe in relation to Billy, even Lily in relation to Cane and Mac in relation to Billy). Not only that, Hogan Sheffer apparently recycled one of his most hated plot devices when he had an emotional crushed and vulnerable Amber sexually assaulted by Deacon Sharpe, who coerced her into having sex with him. The whole thing, in Sheffer style, was glossed over and Amber continues to demean herself in Deacon's presence. Next on to the fiasco that's become of Patty William/Mary Jane Benson. A woman apparently so crazy over her lost love with Jack that she's gone mentally ill and killing people, dogs, and causing brain damage to an innocent little girl with no motivation whatsoever that's apparent in the writing. Then there's of course the intense ruining of Adam and Ashley. Ashley has a history of mental illness, yes, but never has someone intentionally driven her to be so stupid and insane. It's not fun or riveting to watch, the whole storyline has dumbed down characters for the purpose of suiting a stupid plot point. Michael Muhney's one-note, campy, and hilarious for all the wrong reasons portrayal of Adam hasn't been helping matter either. Adam seemingly has no motivation or emotion as a character anymore. Many find it hard to believe that this is the son Hope raised. Anyway, not long ago, Jill and Victoria were kicking ass in the board room, Ashley was mixing potions in her lab, Dru and Phyllis were fierce women who didn't take bull and told it like it was. What happened to that? Do the idiots in charge of Y&R right now understand that women are actually the target audience for their show?

Let's also not forget the mess that's become of Y&R's once strong and distinctive African American presence. The Winters family has been neglected or given repulsive storylines (like the Tyra mess) since the BEGINNING of this current writing and producing regime at Y&R.

Y&R used to do boardroom drama and explore the professional lives of its characters like no other soap. That became a key part of the show's success over the past 25 years, whether some liked it or not. It gave various characters the opportunity to interact with characters that they probably wouldn't get the chance to meet if only their domestic lives, well that's been completely ignored by this current writing regime. Even Lynn Marie Latham tried hard to keep this aspect of the show alive, she might have failed, but she TRIED.

Not to mention, those writing Y&R seem to have such contempt for the longtime fans of this show and their knowledge of the history of this show. We've been fed retcon after retcon this year. Like now with Tom and Deacon's sudden interest in art, or the complete mess the Phillip III return storyline morphed into (which, of course, has been ignored for the past two months it seems). Your audience IS NOT STUPID, Y&R. Treat them with some respect, and then you can expect better feedback.

There's been some very worrying trends with this writing regime at Y&R since the beginning. Like the reliance of a set in stone death to drive storyline, the constant victimization of women, loony kidnappings, and the horrible emphasis on art storylines since Maria Arena Bell began her reign of terror. Y&R is not Passions, for years Y&R was the only soap that had a level of consistency to it, and respected the knowledge of its viewers. Viewers have simply been asked to suspend disbelief too much and too constantly with the inane storylines this writing regime comes up with.

Y&R simply does not feel like a soap anymore. Gone are the build up to storylines, the emphasis on character motivation, the gradual pacing that teases the audience into want to turning in the next day. Y&R is not a primetime show, nor does it have the budget to model itself after one. We want our daily soap opera back that's proud of being what it is - a daytime soap!

Maria Arena Bell is an amateur that has no Head Writing training, and her massive ego that refuses to acknowledge any problems with her show, is not doing the show any favors.

Hogan Sheffer and Scott Hamner have disastrous track records at various other soaps. Many of the pacing issues and victimization of women issues have been very prominent on Sheffer's past shows, and on Hamner's Port Charles. Who really came up with the bright idea that all of these people would mesh well together over the long haul? I do not see the reasoning in subjecting this show to being led by three very different, polarizing, and dammging Head Writers who all seem to have a different agenda. Hence the choppy and disjointed direction Y&R has taken over the past 4-6 months.

IF we must keep Maria Arena Bell, since she's married to one of the show's owners, then it's time for her to admit to some mistakes and fire Sheffer and Hamner, and hire a better Co-Head Writer. Preferably, ONE Co-Head Writer, so there isn't too many conflicting visions plaguing this show at any one time. Cutting her breakdown and scriptwriting team in half and replacing a few staff writers with better, more established talent would also be wise. The day to day writing has been atrocious over the past couple of months, and this writing team is seemingly full of people whose work do not mesh well as a team and do not get the essence of what Y&R is.

One does not need to go into Paul Rauch's disastrous history as a soap opera Executive Producer, and how tacky Y&R has looked from a production standpoint recently. The awful Colleen stuff today was horribly produced.

Anyway, if Maria Arena Bell MUST stay, it would be wise of her to hire someone that knows Y&R inside out as her Co-Head Writer. Kay Alden and Jack Smith might have had their detractors, but they wrote a hell of a more of a consistent show that offered variety and stories that were true to the grain of the show and the daytime soap opera form. There's also a host of former Bill Bell proteges like Rex M. Best, Meg Bennett, Michael Minnis, and others who I beleive would do a adequate job of crafting storylines for Y&R. Also, there's also trying to, at least trying to lure a big name writer from daytime's glory days back to the genre or trying to find a real storyteller that is trained in the basics of soap opera writing.

This thread was not created to start any fan wars, or any posts about how daytime is dying and how nothing will be done to save it and we just need to accept it ( :rolleyes: ). This thread is about acknowledging that the current writing and producing regime at Y&R has failed the show in more ways than one and some changes need to be made behind the scenes to better this onetime virtually flawless daytime institution. Daytime deserves better and Y&R fans sure as hell deserve better than what we've been getting from the current writing and producing regime.

This is an appeal to Barbara Bloom, Steven Kent and Steve Mosko at Sony, and Bill Bell, Jr. Do something to SAVE Y&R! The show is in ruins and deserves so much better. Get the show a new Head Writer and Executive Producer.

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner

  • Replies 260
  • Views 31.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Featured Replies

  • Member

Y&R is definitely stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think Hogan is doing EXACTLY what he does everywhere he goes, but none of this is any type of a fit for Y&R (he would have been great at GH or Passions -- I can't think of another soap that would so effortlessly fit his views on women, rape, and alpha males). Yet the more low-key Y&R of MAB and Griffith drove away tons of viewers.

I know Y&R has always been a show which is given lots of TLC. When I started watching, the show's almost comical uniqueness - the lingering pauses, the way so many scenes would be shot through floral arrangements, the way an episode or a scene before commercial might end on a phone or doorbell ringing - made it compulsive. All that's gone now, of course, but the basic core of the show is still there.

They just need to find someone who loves soaps and knows how to write for or produce a soap. I know DAYS is not the second coming, but Gary Tomlin does know how to run a soap. I don't see that at Y&R. Rauch is stuck in another decade, and Hogan Sheffer hates soaps.

Going back to basics may be just what they need.

I also think that phasing out the Newmans and perhaps bringing in a few Brooks or Fosters might help, they could just bring in one or two, and use them to introduce a new generation. This would also involve writing for Jill, so that would also mandate regime change.

Edited by CarlD2

  • Author
  • Member

Y&R is definitely stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think Hogan is doing EXACTLY what he does everywhere he goes, but none of this is any type of a fit for Y&R (he would have been great at GH or Passions -- I can't think of another soap that would so effortlessly fit his views on women, rape, and alpha males). Yet the more low-key Y&R of MAB and Griffith drove away tons of viewers.

I know Y&R has always been a show which is given lots of TLC. When I started watching, the show's almost comical uniqueness - the lingering pauses, the way so many scenes would be shot through floral arrangements, the way an episode or a scene before commercial might end on a phone or doorbell ringing - made it compulsive. All that's gone now, of course, but the basic core of the show is still there.

They just need to find someone who loves soaps and knows how to write for or produce a soap. I know DAYS is not the second coming, but Gary Tomlin does know how to run a soap. I don't see that at Y&R. Rauch is stuck in another decade, and Hogan Sheffer hates soaps.

Going back to basics may be just what they need.

I also think that phasing out the Newmans and perhaps bringing in a few Brooks or Fosters might help, they could just bring in one or two, and use them to introduce a new generation. This would also involve writing for Jill, so that would also mandate regime change.

Completely agreed!

Some changes better be made fast, because Y&R is really feeling like a dead soap these days, regardless of daytime dying out, Y&R feels like a soap on its last legs with all the stunts and plots done purely for shock value with this current inane writing regime.

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner

  • Member

I don't believe Hogan hates soaps. And I don't necessarily think he's a misogynist. I think he's just got a real...I don't know, exploitation film mentality. Which is both good and bad. I think he'd have done well at AMC because frankly I think he's more soft-pedal than Pratt or McTavish when it comes to violence or sexual frenzy. Whereas Pratt just does things to do them. I think Hogan would have done well at OLTL as well, and I still think he could've been very good at DAYS in the right conditions.

It's possible that Y&R could have phased out the Newmans for another family like it did with the originals in the '80s but I think that time has passed. The genre is too weak, and too oriented towards certain "name" stars, many of whom play Newmans and Abbotts. Even with Bill Bell on-hand, I don't think Y&R would survive that kind of sweeping change at the end of the early '00s. I think trying that now would only hasten its demise. Or maybe it can survive as a kind of two-legged dog like DAYS has, I don't know. The question is, would people want to watch a Y&R that is sort of amputated like DAYS? Gary Tomlin may be keeping that show going but I personally do not consider it a model for anything - the show is a shell of itself, pushing forward not with interesting stories but by sheer force of will and IMO, fan apathy.

Okay, I'll consider this. If you're going to change the families, the time to do that is now and not in five minutes. The ratings are going to continue to decline no matter what - even OLTL was still in a 3-point range in 2004. And they will have to treat the characters who are going with respect. I still think it's a massive mistake to consider dumping everyone from Braeden to Scott to Morrow and so on, but whatever. The bottom line is you better have some really amazing people, new people and names, not names from the '80s but from right now, to replace them.

Edited by Vee

  • Member

I think Hogan would have been similar to Dena. He doesn't like vets, he tends to tell stories about pathetic women who live for men, he likes to shove badly conceived new characters at people, he doesn't know how to pace stories or give them a good ending. I guess the main difference is he would have a lot more camp, and she had Todd as a weepy mess, whereas Hogan would have had him raping all over the place.

I see what you're saying about DAYS, but is DAYS a shell because of Tomlin or because of the horrible Corday and the havoc he's wreaked for years, not to mention the chaos and character hackery which has been oncamera for years? They had no identity besides, "This is the show where JER once reigned" or "This is the show which has supercouples who were really big...10-15-20 years ago." They were in the position of being a show with supercouples and a pink slip. Not much else. So they got rid of the supercouples, focused on some of the talent which was being ignored, and their basic soap storytelling is coming through for them.

Y&R doesn't have to be in that position yet. They have made themselves that way because of the mistakes various people have made over the past 4-5 years. They can still find someone who can run a solid show. They can focus on the characters who can carry the show. They can ease out the dead wood, and also cut a lot of the pointless newbie casting and the bringing back people for no apparent reason other than some issue the showrunner has (like the Thom Bierdz return), and learn how to actually tell a story.

I know it's not easy, but it's not as difficult as these people are making it.

Okay, I'll consider this. If you're going to change the families, the time to do that is now and not in five minutes.

That's a good point. I don't think that dumping most of the Newmans and Abbotts now would be a problem. They're all pretty much used up anyway, and the younger generations of the families are played by crappy actors, or actors who don't fit the characters.

Edited by CarlD2

  • Member

Knowing the idiots at SONY, they'll get Dena Higley over to Y&R and have her be a story consultant at DAYS.

Although that would be an absolute disaster for Y&R, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when SONY notify Hogan Sheffer. Schadenfreude indeed.

  • Member

Although that would be an absolute disaster for Y&R, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when SONY notify Hogan Sheffer. Schadenfreude indeed.

Why? At least Dena doesn't play up her sensational stories as "courageous" and "groundbreaking." Dena knows she's a shock and awe storyteller. Maria thinks she's Austen meets Faulkner.

Not that I am advocating for Higley to come to Y&R at all. That would be like trading Brett Farve for Howie Long.

Edited by bellcurve

  • Member

Why? At least Dena doesn't play up her sensational stories as "courageous" and "groundbreaking." Dena knows she's a shock and awe storyteller. Maria thinks she's Austen meets Faulkner.

Not that I am advocating for Higley to come to Y&R at all. That would be like trading Brett Farve for Howie Long.

It would be an absolute disaster because the pacing would change from lightning speed to a grinding halt. Moreso than the actual stories, I think such a change would induce viewers to tune out at a rapid pace because not only would the stories still suck, they would be moving at a much slower pace than viewers are accustomed to, leading to greater frustration with the show.

  • Member

So, in reading all these threads and thinking through the weekend, a thought that has resonated with me (I think from the Spoiler threads...I'm sorry I am not referencing it, but I can't remember who said it) is that they continue to actively re-invent this show.

Think back to 2007, when LML was brought in. It was CLEAR that there was a desire to re-fashion this show. Younger/newbies, faster plots, removal of some classic style issues.

LML was "goddess" for CBS/Sony/Bell throughout much of 2006--yes, there were a lot of departures, but the ratings actually trended up. It was enough that she actually got handed the EP keys to supplement her HW keys.

We know it went to sh!t...but that was only after she lost most of her support staff. Yes, the ratings trended down a bit, but at least one poster here said LML was NOT fired for creative or ratings reasons...but because of horrible management (e.g., the show went dark a few times so scripts could catch up). Her abandonment of the EP role during the WGA strike was probably the straw that broke the camel's back.

MAB came on as a caretaker, and to protect the Bell interests. Because she did okay during the strike, and because there were some positive indications frrom fans/cast, I guess (per DaytimeFan) Sony agreed to give managing control back to the Bells, and the Bells opted to have MAB in the role.

At this point, so we're talking now about 2008, MAB was in repair mode. She was trying to fix misshapen and ill-begotten storylines, etc. During this repair period, as we know, the ratings trended down faster than ever before. Part of that was because so much effort was going into "repair" that the stories went nowhere.

Remember, at this time, that MAB fired virtually NONE of LML's writers. Over time most of them left...but we don't know if they were pushed or left of their own volition. We don't know if they were retained simply to play out their contracts, or because MAB wanted to give them a chance. We don't know if they left--in part--out of loyalty to LML.

I mention all this because two underlying issues NEVER WENT AWAY--some of us just convinced ourselves they did.

First, Sony/CBS (and maybe Bell) still wanted to CHANGE the show. The "reinvention" motive that brought LML to the show NEVER WENT AWAY!

Once MAB "repaired" things (at the cost of ratings), she brought HS onboard--and the plot/death/crime engine has been grinding away ever since.

MAB is defending all that has happened in the press, and all indications are that they're continuing to drive with plot-plot-plot from this point forward.

Translation: we're still in full "re-invention mode".

Anyone who wants even a SEMBLANCE of "classic Y&R" back is simply S.O.L.

The Bells SIGNED OFF on the "reinvention" vision that brought LML to the show. They continue to sign off on the reinvention, and MAB is interpreting her job as continuing to steer-the-ship of the reinvention, albeit with a bit more respect for classic Y&R.

MAB is willing to slowly get rid of veterans and classical style points...because like the rest of her management team...she still wants a slicker, faster, younger, cheaper Y&R.

  • Member

MAB is willing to slowly get rid of veterans and classical style points...because like the rest of her management team...she still wants a slicker, faster, younger, cheaper Y&R.

The problem is there's little which is slick about today's Y&R. The show is very erratic, very forced, you can hear the gears grinding. The attempts at youth storylines can often come across like Lawrence Welk playing Beatles music.

I'm not a fan of the woman, she destroyed several soaps I love(d), but JFP, she's a slick producer. You can see her imprint (or at least you could when she had power), you see fast pace, lots of style, lots of flash.

The basic flaw in Y&R now, in my opinion, even more than moving away from the old, is just plain incompetence.

If MAB wants slick or fast or edgy, then Rauch, Hamner, and Sheffer have to go.

Edited by CarlD2

  • Member

The problem is there's little which is slick about today's Y&R. The show is very erratic, very forced, you can hear the gears grinding. The attempts at youth storylines can often come across like Lawrence Welk playing Beatles music.

I'm not a fan of the woman, she destroyed several soaps I love(d), but JFP, she's a slick producer. You can see her imprint (or at least you could when she had power), you see fast pace, lots of style, lots of flash.

The basic flaw in Y&R now, in my opinion, even more than moving away from the old, is just plain incompetence.

If MAB wants slick or fast or edgy, then Rauch, Hamner, and Sheffer have to go.

Regardless, the point is that I think some of us false assumed that MAB was trying to restore Y&R (more or less) to what it once was. I think this was furthered by her press interviews in which she claimed to basically be channelling Bill Bell.

What has come into clearer focus for me is that the forces (Sony/Bell/CBS) that sought to reinvent Y&R back in 2006-2007 are all still the SAME forces (right down to specific executives) who are STILL in control now. Nothing has changed. MAB (and her team, and Rauch) are still working toward the same re-invention now that LML started working toward in 2006. It helps me to remember that this is -- and was -- the continuous goal since they got rid of Jack Smith.

  • Author
  • Member

Regardless, the point is that I think some of us false assumed that MAB was trying to restore Y&R (more or less) to what it once was. I think this was furthered by her press interviews in which she claimed to basically be channelling Bill Bell.

At least Latham admitted the show she was writing wasn't Y&R. In every interview she would constantly talk about how she's changing something and how there was a new way of doing things.

MAB? Not so much. She tries to tell us that her style is on par with Bill Bell's and crap like he's watching over her shoulders ( :rolleyes: ), but her and her writing team's style couldn't be anymore different and out of touch with the true essence of the show. It's a pretty manipulative move on her part.

What has come into clearer focus for me is that the forces (Sony/Bell/CBS) that sought to reinvent Y&R back in 2006-2007 are all still the SAME forces (right down to specific executives) who are STILL in control now. Nothing has changed. MAB (and her team, and Rauch) are still working toward the same re-invention now that LML started working toward in 2006. It helps me to remember that this is -- and was -- the continuous goal since they got rid of Jack Smith.

There's ways to reinvent a show while keeping it in touch with its identity, and MAB and her team have failed at doing that.

Latham's reinvention is also a whole other type of reinvention from MAB and Company's. Neither is particularly compelling and both crashed and burned pretty fast.

I still say any real storyteller that gets the true essence of the show and its characters can tell traditional Y&R stories at an accelerated pace, while playing every major story beat, and not underestimate the intelligence of the audience. Is that being done on Y&R at the moment? I don't think so.

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner

  • Author
  • Member

So, Maria Arena Bell strikes again with her lies that a gay story was still to come on Y&R and it would be "multiple" gay stories. Like always, she lied and manipulated the audience, and in this case, the gay community.

This manipulative writing regime at Y&R, that has no talent to back up their manipulations, need to be fired, like now.

  • Author
  • Member

Someone on another boards mentioned that Michel Logan said this in the latest TV Guide article, and how true is is indeed!

In the latest edition of TV Guide magazine Michael Logan gave a rave to Beth Maitland's acting. He wrote that BM's acting made him yearn for the Y&R of old where epic love and family relationships drove the show unlike now "when the primary plot mover is a peroxide villaness with a dead stuffed cat."

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.