Jump to content

GL: Frank Dicopoulos pitching ideas to save show


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Frank Dicopoulos (Frank) says on his twitter account that P&G is still behind GL but that it is just too costly to produce. He says he is working on ideas to pitch to them to continue GL in some format, either by having a reality show about fans trying to 'save' GL, or a spin off called Company that takes place at Company.

On the one hand this is very exciting to hear but at the same time, after watching GL for 17 years (I'm 21) I was finally starting to get use to the idea of it not being around and now this throws a wrench in there that realistically will be difficult to accomplish (i.e. sets have been torn down, actors are moving, possibly new roles on other soaps.)More power to him for trying though I guess!

I kinda wonder why was it easier for Passions to secure a new cable outlet for a while than GL, given its long history and the fact that they both went down with similar low ratings.

Here is the link to his twitter where he also mentions that the GL tribute and cut off at the Emmy's was not cool with him:

http://twitter.com/FrankDicopoulos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh good God. Someone, please, give this man a home and a job. Let him be a roofer or a sanitation worker. Otherwise we're going to come back in a year and he'll still be wandering Peapack like Bill Bixby on The Incredible Hulk, calling out for Harley or Buzz or Natalia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So I disagree with you all on this.

I think a way to actually preserve some of these shows as a franchise, but also to modernize (something marceline keeps calling for) is to think about building a new enterprise on the bones of the existing one.

In that sense, an Otalia spinoff (on TV or the web or whatever...basically what Crystal is now trying to do with Venice) or an episodic show based in Company seems fine to me.

I realize that while this has worked out in primetime sometimes (e.g., JAGS begat NCIS), it has failed as often as it has succeeded (e.g., AfterMASH). But it can be worth the risk. The Trek spinoffs (especially TNG) are also good examples...I even think that DS9 and Voyager as fairly direct concept spinoffs was not a bad idea (even though I realize most of fandom disagrees). I am a fan of Torchwood and Sarah Jane as Doctor Who spinoffs. I am also aware that The City and Port Charles enjoyed less success..so it is risky.

Of course, the ability to do this usually relies on the core franchise being strong and successful. And therein lies the problem of a new life for GL. The embers of Otalia were the sole ones, IMO, that could have supported a spinoff...but that fanbase is now sufficiently p*ssed off that...I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that soaps may need to transmute in some ways, but putting Frank Dicopoulos in charge is like leaving an OLTL spin-off to Crystal Hunt, or allowing Zombie Michael Jackson to executive produce The Suite Life On Deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have no problem with the idea of a modernized spin-off of GL. I have a huge problem with the notion of wasting that idea on the freaking Coopers. A Guiding Light totally centered around the Coopers has already been on the air for the last 5+ years and was an utter failure. The hyper-focus on them is a big reason why GL is going off the air. A spin-off might have a tiny shot if it was centered around the Lewises or the Spauldings but that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah Mark you love to throw my theorem back in my face, don't you? :P

Actually I agree that spinoffs are probably soaps best chance at soap evolution and I agree with you that Otalia would've been the perfect source for that. I don't think a spinoff about the Coopers, Spauldings or Lewises would work because that wouldn't be a spinoff. That's Original Flavor GL.

I lean more toward the Norman Lear method of spinoff of taking a tangential character(s) and building a show around them. All in the Family gave way to The Jeffersons and Maude. Maude gave way to Good Times. Sadly since they apparently incinerated Otalia, I don't know if there's enough creative DNA left in the corpse of GL to grow a new show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL...I love Frankie D, what a freakin' dork! (and I can't believe someone in a post above suggested he teach "acting," kinda like Joey from Friends?) Of course he would like spin off of GL just featuring Company and the Coopers, but as RVD pointed out, that has already been done and one of the big reasons that GL is now dead. Could some one clue him in on that? Of course, this is the delusional Frankie D, who in an email told me one time the Coopers were the heart of GL and when I pointed out to him that was not true, I made his wife cry. Having Frankie D in charge is a recipe for failure. How about a reality show about an aging soap actor with no talent or charisma who pathetically keeps trying to relive his past glories (kind of a Sunset Boulevard with a man in it.)

And how in hell could an Otalia spin off work? The whole point of it was that it was the angst and the longing from CC...a show centered around Olivia and that wet rag of a character called Nat, would fail...(plus, who would be the supporting cast, that friggin little rat looking son of hers, and Frankie D???) Otalia has a fervernt following, but I liken that to the same following Nuke has, gay viewers desperate to see a couple/storyline which would relate to them. Otalia aint going to fly otherwise.

A "rebirth," of GL would be the only ones likely to work. Maybe if they followed the same format as the proposal from Hurst, which would center on the Spaudlings, the Lewises and the Bauers (no Coopers thank you.) But the key is, Wheeler can't be involved..(people have hinted that the stumbling block was that Wheeler would still be attached to a new version of GL, and no outlet in their right mind would touch that. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can sympathise with Frank.

I worked for a company for 30 years that started tanking after I had been there 25.

They retooled and refocused. We changed supervisors every year and managers every two years. Eventually they sold out and left a lot of long term employees with out a job.

The best he can do is get a recurring job on OLTL or ATWT. Maybe as a doctor,assistant D.A. or bartender.

GL is history untill PGP decides to put it online in 10 years like they did AW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy