Jump to content

Scott Hamner Says Y&R Is NOT Doing A Gay Story


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The problem is the show's values and some of its internal rhythms seem stuck in what would be a cutting-edge model for the '70s or '80s, IMO. It's part of why I could never get into it, despite all the good things about it in the past. And certainly some of those old rhythms for telling daytime story are classic tenets of soap opera, and should be preserved more on other shows than they are. But they seem to have discarded most of the correct 'tempos' and are left with the out of date ones, which is why the gay stuff with Rafe, Adam and Phillip plays like Steven Carrington or Dirk Bogarde in Victim.

It's an old school mentality of how you can present gay material "without upsetting Peoria or our biggest sponsor, Clorox;" a hold-over from the Bell dynasty. But when OLTL, and AMC, and other shows were shattering those boundaries in the 90s and 00s they're just way, way behind. The scenes come off quaint and antiquated, like a queer studies lesson in how TV had to handle gay stories with kid gloves in the past; at worse, they come off borderline offensive, as Adam 'forces himself' to [!@#$%^&*] an attractive young man in the fade-to-black; "what desperate lengths will this madman go to," etc etc. It's a shame, because I think Y&R's immense black canvas in the '90s is a huge boon for its ratings still and a lesson to other soaps, but they're lost in the past on this issue.

I will agree that I don't think Sheffer or Rauch help the situation. Rauch is a bigot and a very old-school, tacky guy; his methods worked on AW, but that was back in the '70s - I think everything he's done has been mostly crap since. His OLTL worked in its day, but would be silly now, and for all the good in that decade, the ways he warped the show are also very bad. Hogan Sheffer's a talented writer but in a pinch he goes for camp and sheer dark opera; he has no experience writing GLBT material, and is probably as hamfisted and clumsy with it as he was with EJ and Sami and the rape issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Does the new Adam, in looks, remind you of Austin Buchanan?

I was watching some of those old clips from the late Rauch era and you have men like Austin and Michael Grande just BEATING on women. It's so obviously fake that you can't get too upset (although the guy who plays Austin is very scary), but there's such blatant woman hate there. Current Y&R reminds me so much of that era of OLTL, a cheaper, more deflated version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the Bell's don't own controlling interesting in Y&R and nor do they have the money to buy it back from Sony.

I think if Sony and CBS got together and forced Maria, Hogan, and Scott off this show, it could happen. They just have to try, and since Sony is the one paying for production costs and both national and international distribution, they have a lot of leverage.

Someone needs to force change on this show. Y&R needs a complete overhaul, both behind the scenes and in front of the camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My experience with Rauch OLTL is years later, through YouTube and WOST and so on, but yes, Adam does resemble many of those interchangeable white villains. Maybe Jamie Sanders. And Mary Jane could be Ursula Blackwell or Tracy James. It's also a Sheffer thing, though, I think, these high-camp, dark baddies. And while I think Sheffer can do it well sometimes, I don't think his style is really a good fit for Y&R. I mean, the show has always done some crazy [!@#$%^&*], but his work just seems too current for Y&R, even when he's bad.

I also think they inadvertently stumbled into a narrative plus for them, or that is, a dubious plus for the unfortunate way they've chosen to tell this story, due to how Chris Engen walked out over queer fear. If CE had remained in the role, well - he was a cute guy. So is Yani Gellman. At the first sign of Adam and Rafe getting it on, the fangirls would've flocked and ovulated and then Y&R would have been beset by a gay shipper base just like ATWT and GL and OLTL, and every other show that does gay storylines. That's clearly not what they wanted for Adam and Rafe, so instead they have an older, more sinister fellow in the role, very talented, but very clearly not someone the slash-loving girls are going to latch onto. All the better for him to rape Heather or Ashley and lock them in, say, an abandoned nuclear missile silo with a sadistic clown during November sweeps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The weird thing about Mary Jane is the total lack of humor. Sheffer tried to give Julia humor (even though I thought it was just an offensive story), and many of Rauch's crazy ladies had humor. Like Ursula and Maria. I don't know that much about Tracy James. I wonder if the lack of camp is something they have been told not to do, because they set up these weird situations with MJ and the cat and raping Jack and all the rest, and since they aren't played for camp, but they also are hard to take seriously, viewers are left not knowing how to react.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe Tracy James had a doberman, and was obsessed with an oldies song or something.

Hogan Sheffer is usually caught between his camp impulse and his darker ones, so the conflict doesn't entirely surprise me. For whatever reason they don't seem to really gel at this show. I thought when he came on and they said they were going to do a dark story where a woman was literally found dismembered - on daytime! - like, parts, just splayed everywhere like a frickin' scavenger hunt - that that was both shocking and keeping with Y&R's tradition of some shocking scenes, like Phil Morris turning white or the masked lady terrorizing Jamie Lyn Bauer (I think), or Kimball(?) getting his forehead tattoo and then dying in a trash compactor(?). But as I understand it, that story never really got resolved, and now, am I to assume Eileen Davidson is yet again married to Victor and cuddling up with Adam at the same time? And no one noticed Nikki got run over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rauch has been getting a lot of the blame here,but how much influence does he have over the writing??

Didn't we read somewhere that he works the production side only and 'delivers Maria's vision'?

Yes Y&R was the 'racy' soap when it began,by focusing on younger characters exclusively and showing a lot of flesh.

Also,the stories were sexually charged and the was a focus on 'issues' eg breast cancer,alcoholism,rape

Bell told those stories so well.He did try out the lesbian angle with Kay/Joanne but back pedalled.

So he was at the forefront in a lot of ways.

It did take a long time for black characters to be integrated,but it was done.

He tried interracial partners(Neil/Vicky) but again there seemed to be a backlash-although a lot of that was also due to the characters involved and the poor plotting/pacing.

He also updated the show in the 80's by going with the crime angle and business stories.

So,Bill Bell kept his finger on the pulse and adapted the show to suit the times-something the current execs are not doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's why I'm looking at Sheffer more. There may be some Rauch influence (like the black canvas turning into Hairspray's "Negro Day", as someone from Daytime Confidential said), but he is not supposed to be heavily involved with the writing here.

I think Bell's sexual freedoms were advanced at the time, and maybe even into the '90s, but the fact that they would've backed off of Neil and Victoria as recently as the late '90s/early '00s (right?) shows how much the program is still entrenched in a certain mindset, where they seem to be operating off an '80s primetime/TV movie model of "risque subjects."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Alphan!!! Stop the madness!!! Wake up!

There will be no gay story on this show! Of any kind! You have to calm down a bit 'cause a bunch of people will be infected with this unhealthy optimism and we're going to have lots of trouble in the near future when this doesn't materialise. For your own sake, you have to start being a little more realistic.

Pretty much every single die-hard Y&R fan who defended everything Maria wrote up to about two weeks now has realised this regime is up to no good and is systematically neutralising, to put it clinically, this show. This is the worst thing that can happen to any show and is even more frightening when it happens to a soap that was always in a class of its own.

So, hating Scott Hamner and anti-Hamner backlash are silly and hilarious. You can hate him because of what he did with Lethal, because what he's doing now, because of his pathetic murder mysteries, but not because of this interview. The guy is just telling it like it is.

Maria, on the other hand, is a different story. And do not forget a certain TV Guide columnist where all the misinformation came from in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which reminds me: Maria & the courtiers is Carlivati Story v2.0. Almost exact copy.

People were hyping this at best mediocre writer, weekly threads reached fifty gazillion pages of absolute drooling and salivation while a smaller bunch of people were like :blink: WTH?, the HW was presented as this great fan (Finally! A fan of the show is writing it!) who loves the show's history and is honouring it, blah, blah. Flash forward two months or so: this same writer is giving hysterical, maddening, annoying, unbelievable interviews in the soap press defending bullsh!t, offensive stories.

Voila.

This thing goes in cycles. Who knows which show will be next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Y&R needs the same type of reinvention that Wendy Riche et al gave GH after the Gloria Monty era.

A new approach that's still respectful to the show's roots and keeps up with the times, while still feeling like its old self. And, of course, a strong Head Writer talented enough to carry out that transition and one that knows and respects the basic principles of the genre, like Claire Labine did for GH during that era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy