Jump to content

AMC: Daytime Confidential confirming production moving to LA


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Would they pull the plug on the show that isn't the lowest-rated though? I'm sure OLTL will consistently have better numbers than AMC in the coming 12 months (They have better writing, their stars [strasser, ES] are re-signing while AMC is likely going to lose theirs...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Unfortunately, (although I'm doing a complete about-face on my opinion on this, thanks to all this DC news), I don't think it matters. AMC *is* a more recognizable "brand name" than OLTL is, and the cancellation of AMC would be a huge signal to those outside of daytime that soaps were pretty much dead...while OLTL's death (outside of daytime) wouldn't garner as much publicity.

I think AMC would have to fall hard (real hard) in the 18-49 demo compared to OLTL before it was considered for cancellation instead....like at least a 0.4 difference between the two, rather than a 0.1 or 0.2 difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If ABC has decided they're going to cancel a show (and that's a big if) it's OLTL.

They wouldn't go through a huge relocation for AMC if they were planning on cancelling it. If OLTL is cancelled, that means all of ABC's soap operations would be based in Los Angeles. They would be able to cut all the ABC New York staff that oversees them, and Frons would only have to travel to NY once or twice a year to sit on the auidience of The View.

I wonder if GH and AMC will start to share any crew members, kind of like how OLTL and AMC currently share Roger Mooney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I guess we have to go with what DC has said about ABC's perception that AMC is the "legacy soap". They've been right about everything else.

Just out of curiosity though has a network ever cancelled a soap before that wasn't its lowest-rated at the time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No...but every other time, there was a pretty wide gap between a network's lowest-rated and next-lowest-rated show.

At ABC right now, the soaps are so close in the demo, I'm willing to bet they charge about the same amount for an ad on all three shows....which means it doesn't matter which one they cancel.

Like I said, though, if AMC dips to at least a 0.4 difference in the 18-49 demo (consistently) compared to OLTL, then all bets are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since when do OLTL and AMC get significantly different ratings from each other? They're pretty much in the same boat. AMC got a 1.9 last week, and OLTL got a 1.8. They bounce back and forth with what show is higher rated. It's not like OLTL gets Y&R-esque ratings and AMC is alone at the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Household ratings don't mean a thing; the networks sell ads in daytime based solely on the women 18-49 demo. (Even the women 18-34 demo doesn't matter; Passions was number one there when it was canceled).

And over the last year, OLTL has been ahead of AMC more often....but not by enough to make it completely safe in an either/or cancellation choice (last week, it was 0.2 ahead of AMC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah but OLTL and GH both have consistently been doing better in the demos than AMC has for awhile now. AMC is like 5th in the demos and GH and OLTL are like 2nd and 3rd or something like that.

I still say AMC is gonna go before OLTL. Those cancellation rumors this past year weren't for nothing, they had to come from somewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL has done better than both GH and AMC in June, July (over the weekend I was charting the daily ratings for this year by month) at least in Total Viewers. I haven't paid attention to the 18-49 but I'd assume at worse they're on par with GH.

This is kind of happening fast, I do completely believe something bigger will happen with OLTL/AMC by the end of 2010. Why did I ever feel the ABC soaps would be there in the end with Y&R? I do think it's OLTL's cancellation unless AMC falls even worse in 18-49 (I won't say it couldn't happen, the move from NYC to L.A. could backfire fast), like others have mentioned. AMC has Susan Lucci and the bigger brand name. They're not moving it to California to have it be the first one canceled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC has mentioned this brand but I don't even know what it gets them now. What is AMC to people? If you watch AMC now, you will see people lying about dead babies, very uneven performances, a very dark tone, and very thuggish, controlling leading men. None of this is what made AMC a success. The families, the veterans, the humor, the quirkiness, the heart, the social issues. All of that made AMC and all of it is gone. I just wonder if anyone out there now actually cares about the AMC brand.

I don't know if GH has a brand now either. I do know some people watch because they love the mob but the show's hook, what got them attention, stuff like Luke and Laura, or the romance and adventure, all that's gone now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Joss does know the material and maybe just plagiarized some of Emma's data?   Despite all her actions I do think the show pretends Joss is smart and this class is sort of in her new wheelhouse as a degree. Gio playing Carmen was super high pitched to me.  He's a talented musician but that was screechy lol. TBH, we all know I love Sonny to a fault, but I would rather stare at Rebecca Herbst's opening picture for an hour than listen to Sonny and Jason blather on about giving up the mob.  You can even try to fake me out at this point.
    • Denise's daytime/soap resume courtesy of Slick Jones' Soap Hoppers thread THE CLEAR HORIZON         Lois Adams       1960 BEN JERROD                        Emily Sanders     1963 GENERAL HOSPITAL          Lorna Hill            May 1965 DAYS OF OUR LIVES           Susan Hunter Martin Peters    1966-73 GENERAL HOSPITAL      Dr.  Lesley Sullivan Williams Faulkner Webber Webber   1973-84; 1996-09;(occasional); 2013; 2017; 2019; 2021 ABC AFTERNOON  PLAYBREAK    "The Gift of Terror"    Laura    4/5/1973 HOTEL                                 Gail McClain         1984 ANOTHER WORLD             Mary Callahan McKinnon (LaSalle) McKinnon   1986-89 SUNSET BEACH                 Sister Beatrice         1997-98 PORT CHARLES Dr. Lesley Williams Faulkner Webber 1999
    • Well as I sit here waiting for my new episode to load on my system, I'm rewatched Friday.   Say what you want, but I will always live for the Dupree family moments. And I love how much Vernon and Anita were being there for Nicole. Tag-team comforting. That was just cute.   I also love...and I've said it before...how BTG does what Y&R used to do with major characters who you think are not going to be in the episode. Have them pop up later in the episode. It was a nice surprise to see Eva appear halfway through. And I knew at some point that SilkPress Sheila would wind up at that house alone with Nicole. Still gasped since it was the only time she was in the episode.    Another thing that I'm loving has been as we are dealing with fallout from the SilkPress storyline which has been the A story...the writers are finally developing the OTHER A story...that's been in the background. That being Martin's Secret. Love the foreshadowing throughout. From Dani vs Bill and asking what else he was hiding to Kat/Smitty talking post another Martin outburst...which are building...to those unexpected Bill/Smitty scenes. Shame on Bill for planting seeds in Smitty's head.    And the unexpected combo was also great. Vernon/Nicole. Kat/Smitty. Bill/Smitty. Even getting another Martin/Ted scene in. I liked that characters aren't just sticking too much into story bubbles.    I definitely enjoying all the fallout from the SilkPress/Eva reveal. Eva might be done, but she ain't out. And I continue to get SMG Kendall vibes. Was she wrong? Yep. But she was partly tricked, too. So she definitely has an underdog vibe written all over her for some redemption. And one of the best plots on the show continue to be Kat vs Eva. So Kat seeing Eva getting closer to Tomas is only going to make that rivalry worse. It's been interesting to see the effects on the whole Richardson family from Nicole to Ted to Martin. And yes, fingers crossed that Martin stays triggered...since it feels like it's building onto his secret.    Oops at Nicole finding out Andre knew about Ted. I do wonder if she might say it to Dani. And then Dani winds up breaking it off permanently with Andre. And yay! Vanessa showed up for her BFF.   I'm enjoying the C plot of the homeless woman. I totally think there's more to her. And it gives Naomi and Jacob a story. I'm sure I've said it before, but I do wonder if it will tie into the crooked cop story or even Joey somehow. And good to see Ashley and Derek...ironically in a C plot.    And good to see we got three cliffhangers again. I hope this week does the same on Friday. 
    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs. Not a problem. I can respect different POVs. 
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy