Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 13


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Is it just me or are they trying to forget that Colleen had a relationship with Adrian? They are making it seem like she hasn't been with anyone since Jt.

When I was watching Jt/Colleen scenes, I felt like I was watching a guy babysit his little sister

I really hope those rumors about Tammin are untrue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They had Billy saying "I know about your stint with Jt". I wouldn't mind the writers being stuck in the past if Colleen was still being played by LF. Since she's not, it's time to move on. I get the Bac thing since their fans felt cheated by the cousin thing, they could use the closure and then move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought today's show was rather boring. It had it moments with Jack & Victor but the show was blah. The whole Ashley storyline is boring now. The spoiler sounded better on paper than when it appeared on screen. So Ashley can't tell it's not Sabrina and MJ instead? Her falling into Victor's arms in slow motion was lame too. I think it's time to end this story it's lost a lot of steam. And the future spoiler is going to make it even more tedicious to watch.

Everything else was boring....Lily ...Colleen and Jeffrey and Gloho....didn't care for them.

Now on to the previews.

Gawd...glad to have Thom Bierdz back but the whole I am gay storyline has fallen flat in just a short time. It seems no one really cares why he left...meaning the characters find it lame that he faked his death because he was gay. Why is Jill not upset about this? I would think she would be furious with Phillip instead it is Katherine who is pissed off. That is way off. Jill should be the pissed off one and Kay the more sensible one. Although I can see Kay mad too but NOT Jill? It makes no sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I actually don't mind the stories - sure there are some beats/angles I don't agree with but I understand the overall stories. It's the pacing that I have major issues with. I like my soaps slow, stretched out.

Once again, the show doesn't follow up the last scene. In tomorrow's US episode, it's already the next day - no follow up to Ashley fainting at all! Episode continuation is one of my biggest pet peeves and I will bitch more about that than say plot holes. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A better actress would be able to hide it, e.g. Nicole Kidman. TS just chooses not to conceal her accent (to keep to her roots as she's said) or she's just not that good of an actress to be able to do so. In any event, Colleen Carlton is an American character, not Australian, and it's very distracting along with her "acting".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UGH...MAB is bad at doing this. She's had some great cliffhangers(this wasn't one of them) and then drops them. I wish someone would tell her to stop doing this. It ruins the whole flow of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely she was--I will never forget the time TS' Colleen mentioned "shawping" (shopping) in NY--Colleen would have been interested in more than that, she would have been touring museums. CC was never a ditz like she is now and used to be my fav character until the recast and the writing became tailored to suit TS. It's unbelievable isn't it? Oh well, she seems guaranteed the role no matter what and this show has bigger fish to fry w/ what it's got going on now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess it goes back to what CarlD2 always says, they just aren't interested in writing smart women on this show, and judging by how the majority of women act on this show, it's pretty obvious.

Or they simply don't know how to write for these characters....

Of course with Colleen again, it's a combination of the writing and the miscast actress, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy