Jump to content

B&B: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I haven't seen the episode, but it sounds like it was a "I know who's behind me, but I'm gonna make a joke" kind of thing.

True... Touching any person who doesn't want you to touch them, straight or gay, is wrong. All I'm saying is that all one needs to do is say: "Sorry, not interested." :lol:

I hope he diiiiid. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"A bunch of bitches in heat" LMAO, Stephanie. I thought this video blog was going to be boring but I could see myself tuning in to watch her everyday

BTW, what the heck did Stephanie ever do at Forrester. They made a big stink about how she was such a great asset and one of hte main reasons why Forrester is a success but when she was there, what was her position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought he was playing snarky Brad again. But I didn't find him lifeless.

I can see him fitting excellently in the template of this show...attractive men who serve as magnets for the women, and who engage in various ram-fights with the other guys. He'll be perfect in confrontations with Ridge and Nick and Thorne and

and Rick.

I do not expect anything more of B&B. I'm delighted to see this familiar face--and body--again. And that is about it. I'm also happy to see some non-incestuous non-Forresters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He looks good with the beard.

Ms Flannery is such a professional, she brings out the best in any of her fellow actors, even Jennifer Gareis.

Flannery and Katherine Kelly Lang have perhaps the best chemistry on the show, still after more than 20 years. :D

And, on Wednesday's episode, Brandon Beemer is very naked, when Jackie and Owen [!@#$%^&*] in the steamroom. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh my Jesus! I haven't watched B&B since before Phoebe died. It went from being my favorite soap to an absolute disaster overnight. I think I stopped watching when Katie was dying and was on that deserted island with Nick. Their pairing is what killed the show for me. Anyway, Don Diamont has arrived and I'm back. I've been pleased with comments from viewers that they're focusing on the two fashion houses again. That means we have hot boys and girls having meaningless campy fun. B&B does that well and it's a relief from those melodramatic stories they were telling. I just hate I missed Karen's return!

Now it's only been one episode, but I thought DD fit in perfectly. He's not the best actor, but he's so sexy and miles more credible than Ron Moss. That's all I need to know. He fits the role and the show perfectly, they just need to match him with the right women. Lesli Kay already showed chemistry with him on Y&R, but I doubt they will explore that. She's destined to be window dressing on this show.

From what I saw, I enjoyed Jackie with Owen and Owen in general. However, I'm not a Jackie fan and would rather they write her and Nick off. They need someone else to replace Darlene Conley. Also, I'd like to see that sexy Mick Cain return as CJ. Put HIM with Bridget (or Felicia). Then gay daddy Clarke can be with Owen and we'll call it a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy