Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I didn't really care about the gorilla. I just wish they'd had a few more returns which would have been fitting for the end (like Carmen Duncan as Iris...and I still have no idea why Sam Groom did not return as Russ when RUSS' DAUGHTER WAS ON THE CANVAS).

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry but I don't see that at all. Don't get me wrong. I completely get that Carolyn the gorilla, her mate Richard & her handler Sam did not work as its in-joke referential nod to the Cullitons & to Samuel D. Ratcliffe AND that it also did not work as a bit of nostalgia to AW comedic high jinks & Felicia-Cass-Wally 80s show. So, it did NOT work AT ALL, agreed. But what does it have to do with the 90 minute show trainwreck & too many changes of EP & HW, etc.? Trying to guess what you mean I can only come up with its being an example of bad decision-making at the top. Is that what you mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Listing again Sam Ratcliffe's soap work history with Loving stint added! If anyone can confirm his exact start date on Santa Barbara, that would be great. 

Another World
script writer October 1979 - ?
 
Days
December 79-March 80 (13 weeks/13 episodes)
 
Another World
script writer: July 1980 to December 1980
 
Days
script writer 3 episodes in Jan / Feb 1981
 
Texas
co-head writer March 2- Nov 6 1981 (included 12 week writers' strike)
 
Guiding Light
script writer January to June 1984
 
Another World
script writer July 1984-March 1985
 
Capitol
Breakdown Writer October? 1985 to March 1987
 
ATWT
Breakdown Writer: May 1987 to Jan 1988
 
Loving
Breakdowns: Feb 1988 to Jan 1990
 
Santa Barbara
Co-Head Writer/Breakdowns: Feb? 1990 to December 1992
 
Another World
Breakdown Writer: December 1992 - December 1995 
Edited by VelekaCarruthers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

There's  no doubt that Agnes Nixon's great writing and her deft handling of the Alice/Steve/Rachel saga had a huge impact on the ratings. I'd say, personally, that her stints on TGL and AW represented Nixon's very best work. I enjoyed her early AMC material, and loved her on OLTL, but TGL and AW were mesmerizing under her pen.

To me, Rachel (under Strasser) started out as an immature young woman, stunted by her emotional problems (abandonment issues, low self esteem, misdirected anger, desperation to attain social status and respect), who simply did not understand how to fix her own issues or control her anger. She was infuriating, but I could understand where she was coming from.

When Wyndham came  aboard, Rachel became...demonic. She was filled with unbridled fury and venom, and behaved like a sociopath. To me, the delicate balance between human being and villainess was lost. I was never able to accept when Lemay turned Rachel into an insta-heroine later on.

Harding Lemay made this assertion in his book (and he would have his own reasons for making such a claim), but certainly in the fan magazines, the rooting factor was overwhelmingly in favor of Steve and Alice. I'm sure there must have been viewers who rooted for Rachel, but I never saw any evidence of that.

David Bailey was not bad, per se, but he was just rather bland and limited. While handsome, he did not have much spark or charisma, and was such a let down after the depth, nobility and quiet strength Sam Groom had shown as Russ.

 

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, if you aren't sure what your own reasons are, at least tell me what you think of my reasons. 1. 90 minute show 2. Affiliates hated 90 minute show & blamed AW moving from her to DAYS as their favorite NBC soap. (Prior AW was the pet/golden child of the affiliates.) 3. Way too many changes in EP/HW. 4. NBC awful at promoting their soaps. 5. Internecine warfare between NBC & P&G. 5. NBC tried to kill the show. 6. NBC tried to get rid of Vicky Wyndham. 6. P&G was too cheap to get really good EP/HW. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you. When first cast, David Bailey was sexy as Hell. And he was a decent actor. But sadly he had limited acting range which relegated Russ to a supporting role.  When Sam Groom played Russ, he was arguably the young male romantic lead of the show.  Groom was a versatile actor who was leading-man material.  I've said this before but -- had Groom remained in the role, I feel the entire trajectory of Another World would have been different. And I'm confident the Matthews family would never have been minimized. Russ and his love-life would have been on a par with Steve/Alice and Mac/Rachel.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

David Bailey was indeed very attractive, but--alas--it wasn't enough to make his Russ compelling. He was certainly serviceable enough, acting-wise, but the show needed someone really strong and magnetic in the role, and Bailey just never rose to the challenge AW needed to keep Russ viable and on-screen.

I loved when we had Virginia Dwyer as Mary, Sheppard Strudwick as Jim, Beverly Penberthy as Pat, Sam Groom as Russ, Jacquie Courtney as Alice, and Audra Lindley as Aunt Liz. The Matthews family was on fire, with the best and most memorable performers (IMHO) bringing the clan to life. Ahhh, the good old days!

Had Groom stayed on as Russ, I'd like to believe AW would have featured him prominently on a permanent basis, but considering how TIIC fired Dwyer, Courtney, Reinholt, Penberthy, etc., I'd look at P&G and NBC with distrust.

The "suits" never fail to live down to my expectations, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could agree with that, yes.

I can see Lemay having his own biases on the Steve/Rachel front.

Thanks for the explanation. I would be so glad if some episodes from early Wyndham showed up (beyond the two bits we have now) to see the change. I've always wondered if Lemay took time but I guess he really didn't, other than what he mentioned about using Ada's pregnancy to soften Rachel.

Do you think Wyndham was playing Rachel similar to Charlotte on GL, or was that a more sympathetic character?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I can't answer the question about Charlotte, but I can add something about Wyndham's acting style versus Strasser's as Rachel.  Strasser played Rachel somewhat similarly to the way Susan Lucci played Erica Kane in the first decade of AMC -- sort of flighty, using her voice to exaggerate things, and a hint of humor, even though Rachel did terrible things.  Wyndham played Rachel with none of that.  There were no similarities between VW's Rachel and Susan Lucci's Erica.  VW's Rachel was dead serious. At times, she almost seemed dangerous -- like she might actually do something violent to Steve or Alice, if she didn't get her way.  VW could play a humorous line now and then, but still it was nothing like Erica Kane.  It really did seem that Strasser's version of Rachel would have been much more redeemable than Wyndham's.  So it is interesting that Lemay didn't begin to soften Rachel until a couple of years after Wyndham assumed the role. He could have easily began Rachel's transition to heroine while Strasser was still on the show.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Oh wow. After reading your post, I realized that they had "Carl Ivati" in the script AGAIN yesterday June 6.    Eva said she was reading his latest, and Tomas said "Work's been so busy, I haven't had time to get into his new series". Then Eva proceeds to tell him that "the first book is called 'Mercy and Goodness' and it's all about how the couple first met and how they got separated".   She goes on and on about how great it is. And she says she has the book in her hotel room if he wants to borrow it. She says it has twists and turns. And meanwhile Kat is snooping in Eva's room to look for the helmet and gloves, and finds the book and dismisses it as "basic". I saw that whole scene -- but I wasn't paying attention to the name of the author.  And when Tomas said the name, I heard it in his accent so I didn't hear "carlivati".  II was mainly trying to see if the acting had improved with the actor playing Tomas, and I think he has improved somewhat.   I only see it when typed out. So they had several scenes yesterday about a "Carl Ivati" book?  Barf! Well at least Kat had the good sense to dismiss it as "basic". Ron Carlivati wrote the breakdown yesterday!   Featuring himself in it! Addressing to the collective "you" whoever you may be: Some of you, months ago, said Oh Ron is only doing breakdowns.  The story comes from MVJ, so he won't influence things, you said. May 27 started it, with Christopher Dunn breakdown and Lynn Martin script. But they didn't need to continue it June 6 with Carlivati breakdown and Jazmen Darnell Brown script.
    • I was completely lost. But it is wonderful that it exists. I didn't really know Robert Mandan had done soaps...well, besides SOAP.
    • Jack and Jennifer are tired. I just don't care about them when they return. They add nothing to the show.
    • Did they really bring back Jack and Jennifer for Jack to prop up Leo and Jenn to serve as an obstacle to Chad/Cat? Are we sure Ron still isn't in the building?
    • We can only hope that they finally kill off Leo too 
    • We can only hope that maybe the new writers might read this.
    • You can get so many storylines from a Will/Sonny/Paul/Andrew/Dimitri mess And I'm sure Colton would do a great job 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sounds interesting. Too bad we never got that story.
    • Not to go too off topic but if you ever want to see more of his Search run just look for SFT Summer of 1966 on Youtube.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy