Jump to content

Interview with Tom Casiello


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hi Mark. Sorry, I felt bad after I realized he was quoting you. No offense!! (Everyone here feels that way about Y&R. Well except me and the beautiful, attractive, and intelligent Sylph! :)

I. just. don't. get. it. It is not a Bergman film and he is not writing Shakespeare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks FrenchFan! Great interview, keep up the good work! I am excited to see what Tom brings in his scripts to Y&R. Sounds like he is really enjoying it there, where is last time when he was writing for that hack bitch from the depths of hell LML.... he had said he didn't quite connect.

Any soap would be lucky to have this guy. He is new, fresh and gets the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never read an interview where Jen Landon looked back fondly on creating Cleo.

And while I understand it's hard for a writer to hear criticism about a particular storyline they liked, I definitely recall ATWT fans praising the actual episodes written around Bryant's death, even if they hated the idea, and thought it was short-sighted move on the HW's part. It was the fall-out that failed, not the episodes themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He was there for a couple years under Laiman and Sheffer, his first writing job after being a production assistant at Another World. He actually left before Jen Landon (who I like) got there, I think. He just mentions her in the interview because he has continued following the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The decision to kill off Bryant was a horrific idea. To this day, I get furious just thinking about it. It was a shitty thing to do. Like Guza killing off Emily and Georgie, young legacy characters for no good reason. It is part of soaps' determination to self-destruct.

Hunt Block, Elizabeth Hubard, Mary Beth Evans and Maura West sold Bryant's loss and made the immediate aftermath good, but the story fell flat. Worse of all for years, I have had to suffer through the often repeated lie that Craig caused Bryant's death while Jennifer Munson's role in sending Bryant in a rage into that car has been ignored. Bryant didn't die because of Craig, in fact, at his most distraught he called his father reaching out in desperation. Everytime I hear that lie, I get furious all over again and change the channel.

Forget what I said about the fans being too hard on soap headwriters, most of them are terrible and their bad ideas have contributed to the decline of the genre. They deserve to be berated and deserve all the scorn heaped upon them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if he's that, but it does disappoint me to think he considers Bryant's death one of his finest achievements as a writer. Personally, I found the whole storyline rather hollow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh that doesnt bother me. What bothers me about him is who he liked to write for on ATWT. He mentioned it in his interview with Ryan and left a sour taste in my mind. He was liking the wrong characters IMO. He doesnt get soaps at all to me. He just says what we want to hear as fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hogan's idea of modernizing ATWT seemed to be taking away any sense of family, turning many of the characters extremely dark without any attempt to make people empathize with them, telling stories which didn't have a strong resolution, but did have plenty of character rewrites and ignorance of history.

I never understood why Bryant was killed. I didn't even think the grief episodes were that great, mostly because I didn't think Hunt Block sold the grief and they seemed to care more about killing his son to make him sympathetic (and justify Carly having sex with him) than about truly exploring the consequences. Then even this was for nothing, because the story became about Jennifer having tantrums and Bryant's death became just another of the laundry list of excuses the so-called good characters gave for Craig's evil ways, even though Jennifer was just as much to blame as Craig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Hogan was great when he first started. I loved his ATWT. He was great at casting and making Craig the anti-hero was good stuff. The ratings actually steadily rose under Hogan which suggested that he was able to hold onto more B&B's viewers than the previous regime. It didn't last long as Hogan rapidly ran out of steam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy