Jump to content

DAYS: Thaao Penghlis attacks the late James E. Reilly


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with Toups. A dead people has to be respected. You can hate JER's work (I do, really do) but call him names now that he's dead is not a god thing to do. By the way, I still think he was a nice man (from what I've read)...I have never thought I would defend him someday ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Somehow the logic in all this is backwards. It's OK to call someone names while they're still alive to hear it, but not OK once they're dead and they CAN'T hear it?

I think Thaao was spot on, and he was giving an opinion of the man's work. He didn't call him any names. It's absolutely hiliarious how angelic people suddenly become when they've passed on. Yes, Reilly was a man. No, Thaao didn't call him names. Good grief, Frances Reid raked Reilly over the coals, and no one is calling her arrogant. The thing is....she did it while the man was still alive. That's the only difference.

I don't know what the man was like personally. I do know there was some of his stuff I liked and some I abhorred. But, I didn't have to work with his work or put up with it. I would give actors like Thaao, with years under their belts, some credit for knowing about which they speak.

By the way, Manson's not dead yet.

And Marlena, how many times have you sat down and talked with Thaao? Just out of curiosity, since you seem to be so infuriated with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, to completely honest, I don't see how it's ever right to call writers and other PTB names, whether they're dead or alive. In some cases, the person might have given interviews in which they've done themselves no favors (Brian Scott Frons, I am talking to YOU, mmkay?), but most of the time, I don't see how it's really warranted. I never did like people referring to ATWT's Passanante as "Pissanante" because it's really...just pointless and childish, I guess? It's silly to say that those names shouldn't be used just because they're dead. Those names also shouldn't be used when they are alive.

Ooooooh, I completely forgot all about that. It's so easy to forget PC's existence. Ridiculously easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please take this as a joke...I don't think DaytimeFan will EVER stop calling LML "Hack Bitch From Hell" :)

I totally agree on the bolded part above.

Indeed, I believe that it diminishes the credibility of all soap fans when this occurs. I also agree that I am not sure death is a relevant dividing line, but I think name calling is ... well ... I want to say 'immature', but I don't want to be insulting ... at any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well getting back to Penghlis, I think he's perfectly within his rights to say what ever he wants and to be judged for it. IMO Reilly's death is still a little fresh for some. He could've been a little more sensitive. But I'd hardly constitute this as an "attack." The subject line made it sound like Penghlis was digging up the man's grave and screaming obscenities.

I know I'm a broken record on this but Victoria Rowell, Cady McClain, now Penghlis...I for one welcome this trend toward honesty or venting if that's what you want to call it. It gives the audience a chance to judge for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmm, I call that throwing anything at the wall and seeing if it sticks. So what, there is a tidal wave (off camera) so what, Marlena is brutally murdering people (but not really), so what if we see non actors Hogysten and whatever his name was stuck to the floor, none of it made any freakin' sense! All of it was thrown at the audience but none of it came together. You can be as outrageous as you want to be but you have to connect the dots and it must make sense...within the world that the writer created. I dont get why people think he is such a creative writer when he just pulled things out of his ass (for what it is worth, I never saw his first run on Days that people laud) Like we havent seen islands before on a soap??? (also for what it is worth I thought that the island was a much more entertaining part of the story then the murders which got monotonous.)

And what was the one thing he forgot to throw at the wall, any sort of human emotion..(true I know its hard to have any emotion when your lead actors for the storyline are the robotic Hogysten and the Fembot Hall..but the supporting people were good to go..) A great writer could have taken this storyline where two families were attacked from one of their own, and spun it into a epic story where friends turn against friends in their suspicioun, and where people act out in ways (good and bad )they never would have if they werent under attack. Murders came and went so fast and so many that the characters and the audience were bored with it. I think that is the difference between good fantasy like Dark Shadows, which, for the most part, created a world where the rules were followed and the characters acted consistent and as normal (in a soap sense) as one would in their world.

From what I saw of JER is that he was lazy and sloppy..and yes, kind of mean spirited (in his writing.) He reminds me a lot of his fan, Krazy David Kreizman who dropped storylines in the middle, didnt pump them for their full emotional impact and went back and contradicted himself over and over again while trying to "shock," the audience.

Speaking of GL, I will take their production proceess if they continue to treat their audience with respect and provide us with emotional satisfying stories rich in history like they have the last two weeks. Phillip comes home while filmed in Peapack trumps all of JER's shitty plot twists which make no sense filmed on Days overly dark sets, any day.

However, while I thought the Passions he/she storyline was boring (I think it touched on way too many of JER"s uh, issues, for him to wring every bit of sleaze out of it he could) I did like "some," of Passions which I did think was making fun of soaps in a "we love this stuff cause its so stupid," way. It just never gelled enough to sustain interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i agree with you about the name calling, but personally I don't think people who never like the guy's work should feel bad about his death. Really and truly we suppose to rejoice when people leave the world and cry when they come in, according to the Holy Bible. James fanbase is just as large as the people who detest his work. I for one, liked some of his writing, but when people bring up his "great" writing they always bring up his 90's work: Possession, Maison Blanche, Aremid, The Secret Room, Eileen Davidson to the fifth power, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bringing up serial killers in the same breath of a controversial head writer is a bit much. There's pure evil and mass murder and there's just somebody being "bad" at their job. I don't think it's completely off limits to criticize a dead person, I just think it should be done in a somewhat more respectful manner particularly if the person is not what we estimate as evil (I think JER was the grandfather of the destruction of daytime but I don't think he was evil). Giving them some credit before or after you talk about what they screwed up on. Personally, I'd have respected the insults or honest criticism more if it came while the person was alive. That's really where chutzpah (msp) comes in.

93-96, he was pretty good and normal. Buried Alive. Maison Blanche. Aremid. Gothic, really nice stories and very eye-catching. I don't know where I'd categorize Possession, probably with the good, but it was also probably the jump the shark moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why is it you knuckleheads on these soap boards putting y'all panties in a bunch and fuzzing when an actor is speaking the facts? I mean, it's ridiculous.

I guess soap news must be really slow these days?

Currently, with the way the daytime genre is and the hungry to find honestly in this genre, why are we having bitch fights over an actor's opinion on a person, whether they're alive or dead? Thaao was asked a question and he answered it; Why get mad over that? Just because a soap star is being frank dosen't make them bitter or unprofessional. People need to take a tic tac and go to the gym once in a while.

Thaao is looking at DOOL and daytime from for his POV and I agree with him on a couple of things.

Even thought people such JER and Monty did helped and fu#$ked up daytime in a lot of ways, the blame should also go the execs and owners as well for not being preparing to have people ready to take over their spots or take dayime soaps to the next level.

Just because a person is gone doesn't erased what they did good or bad in their lives or career. Soap fans need to face facts; daytime writers, to name a few, such as JER, Higley, screwed actors out of storylines, awards and jobs because of their egos and daytime execs, such as Corday and Frons fired seasoned actors to push their "youth marketing" to viewers and pleased their egos as well.

Soap fans need to stop kissing ass and jumping to conclusions like Nelson Branco and do research before we rant and rave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We're speaking our minds just like you and others. I for one don't kiss anyone's ass. I speak my mind, if you don't like it, deal with it. But that doesn't mean that people can't reply to my opinions and speak their minds. By the way, Thaoo is the ass kisser here. He knows damn well he cannot insult Corday or his ass will never live to see any 'Days.' I'm sure his astrologist told him that too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People, people Please! This has gone on long enough. I'm sorry, but I'm with the camp that doesn't understand all the outrage. So JER is dead- that doesn't mean people can't criticize his writing style or his effect on the genre. It's not as though Thaao accused him of child molestation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That would require Dani to think about someone/something other than herself.. and we all know Dani only thinks about Dani.  Including her butting into Nicole's business instead of just being a supportive sister.
    • I also hope there will be a follow up to Dani noticing Vanessa with Joey. We need another scene of them two together. And does Dani have any knowledge of Vanessa's affairs?
    • One of the soap greats. I wish I had a stronger connection to her, but her major soap stints passed me by. However, the way veteran watchers have described watching her back in the day makes me yearn for the glory days of soap. As a DAYS fan first, her time on the show is basically an enigma. As years have passed as a member of this board, previous and current members have talked in fondness about her obviously major story with Dickie and David's death, but even more interestingly, her romance/friendship with Bill, and the fascinating tangled tale of her encounter in the park with Eric Peters. It's such a shame DAYS never swayed her back home where she belonged. Though I am more than thankful RC and JG didn't get their grubby paws on her, especially with the horrible example of how they saw fit to write Marie and Liz's relationship with all the nuance and sophistication of a pigpen.  SSH's remembrance of her was wonderful to read, so thank you to whoever posted. Could be cool too if any of her Clear Horizon material popped up. Does anything of that show exist?
    • All this! Especially the highlighted. If today was any indication to what's to come, I see Mona and Shanice roles being beefed up. I personally think they are going to test her out with Doug.  I initially didn't see it for Kat, since the Eva reveal, and few of her scenes around it. Made me warm to her for some reason. 
    • Agreed, pretty much with everything. The dialogue bugs the hell out of me. I don’t think a lot of it even works written out on a page, much less spoken. Even a veteran like TT can’t help but sound stagey with such purple prose. Re: the Duprees. I’m guessing that they’re holding their cards close to their vest on them for the various mysteries that will unfold, but I wish they weren’t so opaque and tonally weird as characters, especially in these make-or-break early days. (One reason why I wish they’d give up on keeping secrets from the audience and just allow them to speak freely, allowing the tension to come from what other characters don’t know.) Dani is giving Carly Corinthos realness, which isn’t a compliment. Oh, don’t get me started on the Black male characters and the tropes they’ve employed thus far. I had hoped a Black-created, NAACP-co-produced soap would be more cognizant of these traps, but nope. At least it seems like they’re playing the long game with Andre and Dani after all this feening over basic Ashley.
    • I feel like the reason they went with these two stories is because these are common stories told on soaps that allowed them to really tie the entire canvas in and help develop their relationships. I do understand the implications of having two cheating stories and these being Black characters but MVJ has always been clear that she wanted to show us the same way characters are featured on any soap. I don't think any story should be off limits just because the majority of the characters are Black. We have several positive representations of Black men so it's not like everybody is a cheater or a bad spouse. I also think the two stories and relationships are different enough that the stories don't feel similar in any way.
    • Well, on that point, I am one fan, and I know I'm not alone in this, who thinks that it is possible to have a time or times on a show where the ratings do not reflect the show's popularity & I think that is because it is possible for the metric to be broken. 
    • The Anita scene with Ted was written all wrong. Dani should have come in like she did, all guns blazing, with Anita showing up and ushering Dani out, as she stays alone with Ted. He's ready for more fury, but at first she treats him like her son, not just some man Nicole married, she's confused and heartbroken, needing explanation. Then, she drops the motherload and tells him to get his damn act together like she did. Anita came off completely one-note. And with both Dani and Anita in the scene, the self-righteousness just made both look like harridans who wouldn't shut the hell up. Very disappointed in that scene. The scene with Eva was much better. It could be good if somehow Vernon starts to soften towards her and that puts the first signs of strife into their marriage. We need something interesting to happen with them, for once. Mona was the MVP today for me. I love Leslie and especially Eva, but I was firmly on Mona's side today. She deserved to get her two cents in. The scenes just left me wanting more of her and her inner life. They should really drop Ashley, Derek, and Tomas and put Mona, Laura, and Shanice on contact stat! I don't get why Leslie continued to lie about where she got the money Ted gave her though? What purpose would that serve? Faint hopes that Mona would still forgive her, I guess? Kat really gets some of the best lines. Through all the bitchiness and judgment, she has a talent at keeping me on side because somehow she's never come across unlikable to me, where someone like Dani, even Anita, falls. The scene with her, Martin, and Nicole was a necessity. Things are coming together to making that part of the family feel more like a family. Now I anxiously await Kat and Ted having a one on one confrontation. It would be perfect if it happened to be in the new Ted's first scene/episode.
    • They’ve been really nailing the fall out super well and your whole post really highlights some of the great parts and ramifications we’re seeing.
    • I like that this episode highlighted the ramifications of what Eva and her rotten mama did. They were so focused on Ted and Nicole, not even realizing that other people would be affected. Eva thought nothing of what she did to Mona bc she was sure no on would hold anything against her but Mona is right in that they ruined her reputation with the Duprees. They dont blame her but they will likely never trust her judgement again. She has to walk by them feeling the guilt and shame that she'll never live down bc she unknowingly played a role in the hell that was unleashed. Not to mention the trauma and trust issues she no has bc she genuinely viewed Leslie as a friend   And poor Laura nearly died when she had that car accident and then had a heart attack and infection bc she was poisond. She's been recuperating for 3 months. She missed her trip to Hawaii and no idea what impact this has done on her relationship and her own plans but no on was thinking about that.   Eva and Leslie need to be made to feel like ish bc this was bigger than just Ted and Nicole
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy