Jump to content

B&B: Daytimes Biggest Clusterf*ck?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was just thinking about it, and B&B, even though it has many merits, and I love it in its own little way... is it the biggest clusterfuck in daytime? I mean like you're screwed if you do screwed if you dont... it's just a mess. It really is. With them constantly breaking the time-space continuum with parents like 9 years younger than their kids, and the rampant incest, the ultra-sluttage on the parts of both men and women and the fact that they've built the show around a singer-wannabe-hairmodel who's never acted a day in his life. It's the small cast of people who supposedly live in one of the biggest cities in USA, its the least diverse, the most overall messed up, and only goes in circles. As a soap its a little embarassing, but still a soap in its own right, Bill Bell's own retarded red-headed stepchild, Y&R's demented younger sister and worth watching for the likes of Susan Flannery and Lesli Kay.

B&B may be the second rated show but it'll always be screwed like a stray pooch in chinatown. Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I love B&B, even when it's a mess I find it so enjoyable.

It's like pizza. It's not good for you (nor is it bad for you really, the lycopene found in the tomato sauce prevents some cancers, the cheese provides calcium and protein), it's always satisfying, it's fun, it's light, it's bubbly...however, it can make you fat, bloated, lethargic...how many times have I said to myself "I'm never having pizza again!"

And yet, I always return for my slice of pie.

B&B is my soap opera equivalent. It's love and it always will be for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B at its (rarely occuring best) can be a lot of glee-like fun. B&B at its worst is really boring. But B&B at its mediocre normal self if the definition of soap comfort soap. It doesn't try to be deep or intellectual, you see the same characters you have always seen and who you know at the back of your hand. The soap ages with you and doesn't constantly respawn. It's just there and to me it will always feel more comfortable than all the other wannabes. It's like those sitcoms that quietly run for 9 or 11 seasons while the great newly hyped Fireflys or Veronica Mars get done in in less than half the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will never understand why people think B&B is a good soap. Every time I have ever turned it on, it is extremely stilted dialogue and incest, or Brooke going back and forth between various members of Ridge's family and occasionally some stepchildren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yout must have caught it during one of its down times. B&B is very inconsistent. When its good, its REALLY good but when its bad, its really bad. It is the show that has the best ability to rebound and it always goes through cycles of being on fire and then a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And because storylines change every 5 minutes (ok, more like every 6 months), that means that it constantly changes back and forth between good and bad. Which also means that when it really annoys you you can check back 6 months later and have a decent chance to catch an "up" time, with the same characters you know and love.

Besides, who says it has to be good? It just needs to be entertaining and/or likable. I would classify rarely any soap as good (especially the ones like ATWT that just look cheap) and the ones that aren't bad often are way too pretenious in my eyes.

Generally there are very few people who try to argue that B&B is seriously good in quality outside of a few isolated time periods (I thought Throoke was genuinely good, as was Bridget reacting to the Breacon affair, as are several of the location shoots). Other than that B&B generally has the amusement factor of having a cage full off cage fighter rodents who go at each other at different times in different situation. Brooke vs. Steph, Brooke vs. Taylor, Brooke vs. Amber, Ridge vs. Rick, Ridge vs. Nick, Bridget vs. Katie, Jackie vs. Stephanie, etc.

It's amusing because you know that at the end nobody gets hurt because rarely anybody important ever gets written off.

Man, I think I just compared B&B to a soap version of WWE.

Sure, the downside is that I can't even remember when B&B managed to create a moment of genuine feeling emotion (Taylor losing her kids? Bridget grieving over dead baby Nicole? Some people would argue Storm but to me that felt like too much of a drama stunt), they used to be better at that. Still, beats a lot of other soaps to me that come across as positively desperate to me when it comes to creating those moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

God knows I love B&B. I've been watching this show for nearly a decade now and I understand it rides a wave of good and bad. The problem I have is that the show has been one consistent blob of BAD for awhile now. Way longer than the usual three months it takes for this show to get its crap together.

I never expected highbrow art from B&B, but I do expect stories to make sense and for the characters to be consistent. Although I remember barking at DaytimeFan and others on the board for this, I do have to ask again why does stuff like Crazy Pam, Nick's Siren Vision, "Rick, Rick, Rick," get a free pass on this show?

B&B wasn't always like this. There was a point in time when the show took itself seriously, even when they brought aboard Sheila(at least the first time around). Yes, the show has had its campy moments over the years, but the difference between camp and downright stupidity is that at least the show played it straight when it was campy(which is kind of the definition of camp anyway).

Yes, B&B is one big cluster***k. And it's annoying because the potential for greatness is there. B&B doesn't have to stoop to lame car chases and telenovela-style acting to get recognized. The show should never give up on it's domestic audience or assume that it will always be safe behind Y&R. In a day and age where stations are a.) cutting costs and b.) looking to get more bang for the buck, who's to say stations in bigger markets won't eventually turn their back on B&B and air an hourlong newscast, the way the Tulsa affiliate treats it?

I don't think the show should be dreary like a JFP/McTavish/Guza show, but I mean write, act, and produce the material like it's the best thing you've ever done and don't always assume people here in the states won't appreciate it. Even IF it bombs, people will respect you more than if you just throw in the towel altogether and go for the cheap quick fix.

I thought Storm's death did provide alot of emotional drama, even if it was a sweeps stunt. Just about anything Patrick Mulcahey wrote used to had a vast amount of emotional depth and characterization. Ashley Abbott's arrival to B&B and her romance with Ridge was one of the more mature, slow-building, sweeping romances this show saw in awhile. It totally pissed me off when Ridge cheated on Ashley with Brooke and chose to be with her. B&B does try to force the viewer to feel for the characters, but sometimes, it's absolutely genuine(whether it is through the writing and/or the way the actors play it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This may be my all time favorite thread title, and I agree with most of what is said here.

It is so ironic, because I was preparing a blog on this topic...because B&B just SCREAMS "wasted potential" to me on every level.

You see the bones of a great show down there...still possible. But they keep heading south, like some kind of Higley-soap.

Oh look, Jackie hates Katie today! Yesterday, she loved her...and tomorrow she will too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well put.

I'm usually one of the shows biggest defenders, praise Brad Bell for writing some of the best storylines ever (in my book at least), but I think they've lost me.

I can't take it anymore. It's got basically the right characters & actors to be enjoyable but the writing and most of all focus leave me back bewildered. It just lacks heart - and this is sth. B&B did ALWAYS deliver. It felt true to itself. I've been missing that for 13 months now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is wonderful! Thank you for posting this! I loved the first two seasons and never got to see the final season when they cancelled the DVD release. I've been hoping this popped up on streaming but no luck. Happy I'll finally get to see how it ended!
    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In case it is of interest to anyone here, I have digital copies (computer files, mp4 etc.) of all of the episodes. And, besides having the files they are all up on my usual video hosting site, acct name: shallotpeel, channel it is in: Primetime Soaps and file names like  Flamingo Road S1E15 Hurricane Flamingo Road was a primetime soap on NBC by Lorimar Productions. 2 seasons. 1980-1982. Morgan Fairchild, Barbara Rush. Developed by Rita Lakin.   
    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy