Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

And a large number of major donors, not just in Florida. It seem obvious to me that after the Holocaust the number one priority of the Jewish people is having and protecting a homeland.  No matter what.  This tends to be a topic where I keep my mouth shut in real life and discuss only very lightly online. As far as I can see there is not a good solution.  Eventually there will almost certainly have to be two states and that will almost certainly lead to a terrible war. I bet if we could check in on planet Earth in 200 years this conflict will still be going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you'd be right, J.  

 

Maybe im simplifying this, but there is room for homelands for both Jews and Palestinians.  Great example is the Sinai, it's been relatively dispute-free for almost 40 years.  Granted, the distrust wasn't as deep between Egypt and Israel, but there has to be a way forward here.  

 

The US and the UN have to approach this without playing favorites and come to some iron clad agreements.  Actually the US should stay completely neutral.  Let the UN get the work done.

 

Im not naive, this won't happen in my lifetime. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Israel doesn't trust the UN. Even the Secretary General just came out and said that an unfair number of resolutions have been brought against Israel and I don't think anyone would call him pro Israel. And let's be real, the United States would never leave it's fate in the hands of the UN, so why would any other nuclear power?   The population of Gaza is exploding, so something is going to have to happen, I just don't think there is any solution that leads to peace. I hope I'm wrong. The occupied territories are a small space full of children. I hate to even think about what a large scale war would mean for them, after we saw the carnage summer of 2014 brought.

 

Meanwhile instead of leaving bad enough alone Trump is determined to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. Obviously, I'm pro Israel, but why on Earth stir the pot? I imagine Kushner is behind this. Maybe they want to push the conflict forward so he is President when it happens, I don't know. It's pure folly from my perspective.

 

As to Carl's article, wow. I had no idea things were getting that ugly in the Florida democratic party.  I'm getting less hopeful that we can get our s*it together and rebound from this loss anytime soon.

Edited by Juliajms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A bit on the far right gaining more power in Germany; the more interesting part is some of the quotes from the party's supporters, some of whom are eerily similar to complaints in the US (about issues like trade).

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/germanys-far-right-rises-again-214543

 

I felt a bit queasy when I read those smug Amazon reviews for Ivanka Trump's boots - lots of hee hee and ha ha about how they would be perfect for Berlin in 1933 (presumably this was written before the Berlin attacks), and other cutesiness that blithely references Nazis. I wonder how many of those people know about what's going on in Germany now. 

 

I'm wary of just how many out there on social media are more concerned with getting retweets, likes, shares, and upvotes to actually care about what's going on. It's easy to be precious and adorable, not so easy to actually deal with the policies that are going to cripple so many people who don't have the time to read your tee-hee commentary. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The quest for likes is a concern, OTOH, I couldn't imagine where we'd be, if we didn't make a place for satire and humor, especially when sh*t hits the fan!

 

Even if you look at times of war and privation, there is a place for comedy, humor and biting satire.

 

Amazon has a, er, "tradition", I guess you could say of mocking things and aspects of society that are backward, incorrect and just plain wrong.

 

As a "lady-writer" myself, I thought the reviews on the specially made 'Lady Pens' for 'Lady Writers' made especially for our incapable hands (too soft to pick up an ordinary pen or do the equal work of a man) were biting, sarcastic and yes, funny.  It made fun of the plight of women writers, which is plight caused by sexist, ridiculous standards about the supposed limitations of 'female writers', comediennes, etc. (thanks Jerry Lewis).  

By mocking, it showed this sexist mindset to be ridiculous as are the people who represent that mindset.

 

Sorry @Vee but I took it a completely different way reading these mock reviews as I did when reading about the pink Lady Pens.

Sometimes satire is done clumsily and poorly and the intention doesn't come through clearly- I don't see this as one of those times though.

 

And yes, I have read about what's going on in Germany and of course, it is point of concern (as is Syria, Nigeria, the Sudan). Hopefully the majority of Germans will be a bit smarter than Americans in their voting choices (after all, Austria rejected their far-right candidate). We can only hope at this point.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

For me it's a thin line joking and winking about the Holocaust and the runup to it, because it trivializes genocide and it gives huge amounts of space to make the people you're against seem better than they really are. I'm sure some of the reviews were hilarious and didn't do that type of thing, but the very first one I saw was going on about Berlin 1933, and it left a bad taste in my mouth. A lot of the Ivanka protests, while justifiable given that she played a major role in her father winning and will now continue to work for/with him while still shilling her products, have a self-sabotaging tone, because they try so hard to be cute that the point being made seems much less important. I was reading an article about the letters or notes people are leaving to Ivanka, and some of them are so honest and powerful, and then you have others that essentially say, "I don't like your father...or your clothing line." It makes the whole thing into a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

On the one hand, I love the fact that Trump Nation continues to browbeat even the GOP.  As we have said countless times, Trump only exploited (and continues to exploit) what was always true about the Republican party; and if they now found it impossible to control him OR his minions and followers, then they have only themselves to blame.

 

On the OTHER hand, if Trump Nation can intimidate into submission and/or silence people who are supposed to be their allies, then how will the rest of us ever stand a chance against them?  

 

And I STILL find it ironic AND disturbing that Trump Nation, in fact, constitutes a relatively small minority of citizens in this country.  It really will take an act of God (or another national tragedy) to stop their growth and influence.

 

Here's what I think:

 

At some point, the Republicans who aren't part of Trump Nation will have to sit down with the moderates, the liberal progressives, the independents and so forth, and call some sort of truce.  It might not be anything as formal as officially leaving the Republican party and either joining the Democratic party or forming a new, third party.  But all sides will have to swallow their respective prides, concede this-or-that platform principle and then ban together in the name of silencing the Trumpkins, the alt-right and others of their ilk -- online, in the media, on the Senate and House floors, and in the overall court of public opinion.

 

Separately, no other group can stand up to Trump Nation and win -- and groups like that, IMO, thrive on the divisiveness of their opponents.  But if the establishment wing of the GOP and their affiliates can somehow coalesce (sp?) with those on the other side of the metaphorical aisle, then there might be some hope yet the rest of this country.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

The problem is that there simply aren't any decent Republicans anymore. Sure you've got John McCain and Lindsay Graham at least trying to be sane but any member of the GOP who might be willing to stand up has been neutered or drummed out of the party entirely. Plus with the Russian hacking don't think for one second that a lot of these people aren't being blackmailed into silence. I think our only real hope is some kind of massive backlash in 2018 and given the rampant stupidity and learned helplessness from people on both sides I'm not hopeful that can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy