My understanding is if a Republican doesn't get Ohio then he/she doesn't get the Presidency, guess that's held true for decade's

Yep. No Republican has ever won without Ohio but three Democrats have: Grover Cleveland, FDR and JFK.

More childish antics from Trump before the debate. A good writeup on what this is really about:

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-clintonites-rat-s-ass

 

(I don't even remember her on GH - she must have had a bit role) 

It's hysterical to see the very people who have been claiming voter fraud ever since the black guy won suddenly go "never mind!" It's another example of how the GOP poisoned its own well. I heard someone on NPR this morning say that since the Ohio GOP has split with Trump they aren't sure they want to vote Republican down ballot. It's a mess.

Moonves tries to claim his giddy Trump comments early this year were fine because he was different then.

 

(he really, really wasn't) 

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cbs-ceo-les-moonves-clarifies-donald-trump-good-for-cbs-comment-229996

From a poll I read this morning, HRC is now up by 2 points in Texas. 

I've always wondered how it's remained red all these years, given it's diverse populace.  Same goes for a lot of the South (my home) - this region is more than just rednecks...

 

I've been thinking that. I know Texas has millions of Latinos and white voters who don't vote republican.

now as far as Missouri, the rural areas vote overwhelmingly republican.....but St. Louis, Kansas City & Jefferson City Vote overwhelmingly democratic. 

I find it funny that this year's airing of It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown--the 50th anniversary airing, no less--is on right before the debate tonight. Talk about a study in contrast. 

From a poll I read this morning, HRC is now up by 2 points in Texas. 

I've always wondered how it's remained red all these years, given it's diverse populace.  Same goes for a lot of the South (my home) - this region is more than just rednecks...

 

I've been thinking that. I know Texas has millions of Latinos and white voters who don't vote republican.

now as far as Missouri, the rural areas vote overwhelmingly republican.....but St. Louis, Kansas City & Jefferson City Vote overwhelmingly democratic. 

AND both the MO Senate and Governor's races are VERY competitive--and right now, the Democrats have the edge.

From a poll I read this morning, HRC is now up by 2 points in Texas. 

I've always wondered how it's remained red all these years, given it's diverse populace.  Same goes for a lot of the South (my home) - this region is more than just rednecks...

 

 

The GOP promoted itself as the party of family, faith and traditional values, which I suspect appealed to many Latinos, particularly in the South and Southwest. Also, many Latinos migrated from countries that had governments that were seen as oppressing personal freedoms (Cuba, El Salvador, Nicaragua, etc) or at war (Colombia), and the anti-Communist, anti-socialist rhetoric that the GOP offered probably seemed like a comfort to people flocking to the U.S. from politically unstable countries.

 

I think it was different for the Latinos settling in Northeastern states or even California because states like New York (especially New York City) generally saw the Democrats as more attractive because of Democratic rhetoric promoting socio-economic values, emphasis on promoting the social good of all, no matter where you come from, contributing to the growth of a better society for all. Whereas the Republicans emphasized 'up by your bootstraps' success of the individual, the Democrats emphasized maintaining and cultivating programs that would help people succeed and even 'a helping hand' to success for those who needed it. To Latinos who were migrating from countries that they loved but where economic opportunity was lacking (Puerto Rico, the DR, a few South American countries that were in economic turmoil, e.g. Argentina), the Democratic party must have seemed like a window of opportunity, while allowing them to keep their identities with them.

 

The anti-immigrant voices in the GOP have been gradually getting louder and more prominent over the past 20 years and so has the shift of many Latinos from the GOP to the Dems

 

I think you're also seeing some generational splits in the Latino community. For example, a lot of younger Cuban-Americans now favor eliminating the embargo, while some of their grandparents (and even some parents) may still be hardliners.

 

In Texas, many Mexican-American young women (under 45) have been opting for education and career before marriage or children, many are having smaller families, less children and so family planning and organizations like PP are no longer shunned and the support for women having choices is getting more vocal support from the Latino community and groups of highly educated Mexican-Americans are now opting for political choices that reflect their progressive stance. 

 

From what I've read, experienced from talking to friends, I feel like the shift has been happening but it has been very gradual.

 

Edited October 20, 20169 yr by DramatistDreamer

Speaking of Texas, it's voter suppression time:

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/tarrant-county-gop-poll-watchers

 

 

The village will have an idiot tonight, rest assured. 

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/sarah-palin-donald-trump-debate-230007?lo=ap_a2

 

A woman who is accusing Bill of assault will be at the debate tonight:

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/former-tv-reporter-accuses-bill-clinton-of-sexual-assault-229987

 

The problem with this, even if you believe it's true, is that we have heard time and time again that sexual assault against women doesn't matter. It's all lies. It's a conspiracy. Yet here we are saying it does matter if it involves Bill.

 

I notice they aren't claiming this woman was silenced by Hillary - they must have gotten bad feedback on that one. 

I notice they aren't claiming this woman was silenced by Hillary - they must have gotten bad feedback on that one. 

Either that or Hillary didn't even know the woman existed until today. 

 

 

 

The village will have an idiot tonight, rest assured. 

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/sarah-palin-donald-trump-debate-230007?lo=ap_a2

 

LOL....I was thinking the same thing!

 

So tired of hearing about that darn wall.....

He's melting down defending Putin. Amazing.

He's melting down defending Putin. Amazing.

Hi! I was hoping you'd pop in. Love reading your debate updates. This entire thread has been quiet for the last half hour.

I was on a plane.

 

He is being humiliated (and embarrassing himself) worse than debate #1. She called him a puppet of Putin.

I was on a plane.

 

He is being humiliated (and embarrassing himself) worse than debate #1. She called him a puppet of Putin.

No worries. I was just surprised that no one had yet mentioned what was happening in the debate. I think a lot of people are exhausted by Trump and his antics.