Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

David Cameron's position has to be in peril now.  He's the one who called for this referendum in the first place to try to silence the more Euro-skeptical wing of his party.  He took a gamble, it did not pay off.

 

The reality is that this divide has been building for years.  Many Brits have been convinced (with lots of erroneous information courtesy of tabloids like the Sun) over decades that they are carrying most of the financial load for the EU.  They felt that Brussels and Germany wielded too much power over decision-making, then again many of the countries in the EU also feel that Brussels and Germany wield too much influence over decision-making for the bloc.  Add in the xenophia, blaming immigrants for taking jobs in sandwich shops and servers in restaurants (low wage jobs that Brits generally do not like) and you appeal to many different aspects of the disaffected. Now Britain, like the U.S. should be looking at why wages are stagnant and so low, rather than raising the wage to appeal to the average Brit.  Nevermind the fact that the Leave campaign never gave any specifics on how they plan to regulate immigration.  

Boris Johnson is a boor of an individual but Cameron is not well liked either.  His austerity measures, which are generally regarded as a failure, caused a lot of disenchantment, disillusionment and even pain in some segments of the population.  Cameron, who represents a certain elitist symbol, who is seen as removed from the struggles of everyday British citizens was definitely not a good spokesman for the Remain campaign.

 

I've already heard that Scotland (who overwhelmingly voted to Remain) is re-examining its referendum to stay with Great Britain.:unsure:

 

Sinn Fein is already proposing the possibility of a reunified Ireland (N. Ireland had also mostly voted to Remain).

 

Japan has stopped trading due to the financial chaos that has ensued.

 

Uncertain times, to say the least.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I don't agree that wanting controlled immigration is xenophobia.  Trump is Satan as far as I'm concerned, but if you ask people to take in too many people from another culture at once, conflict tends to arise.  Look at your own country, which is probably the gold standard for immigration.  You don't take on more than you can chew, but the people you let in are actually given the help they need to make a good life.

 

In the US, people aren't given much help and the school system is how people tend to assimilate, which means the older generation tends to be lost.  Economics drives our immigration policy (which is why elite republicans tend to favor amnesty), but it is far from ideal from the pov of of working class Americans or immigrants, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A lot of UK areas with a heavy immigrant population also voted to leave, and in some cases not by close margins, so I think it was more complicated than just racism or xenophobia, but obviously that had to play a part. 

 

In some ways it reminds me of the GOP elites and the Rove types who harnessed the religious wrong and the tea party, only to be turfed by them. David Cameron harnessed these to get into power, and he truly stopped to new lows not long ago in the London mayoral elections (he and others all but called the Labour candidate a terrorist sympathizer and enabler). He's reaped the whirlwind, as he's now resigning. He'll be gone by October.

 

I just hope Johnson doesn't replace him. And if he does I hope Obama makes him squirm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hear you Carl. These really are complicated issues. I just balk at the idea that I must be racist or a hater if I think we have to slowly assimilate people to a western way of thinking or worse yet that it's wrong to want to assimilate immigrants.  I do not want to let in huge numbers of people who don't agree that women and gay people deserve equal rights. I don't blame the Brits for being wary of that either.

 

  I also do want to let in the maximum amount of people that we can bring in and help financially, especially since the US has contributed to the instability in the middle east to say the least. Also, it's just a matter of self interest for the West (especially Europe) to let in as many people as we can without causing social instability. Our aging demographics demand it. The West has really done a poor job of educating people on that front, imo.

 

We also don't go out of out way to help people assimilate in the US. Some of the stories of the Syrian immigrants we have let into the US are down right sad. Just dumped in the midwest with little aid and left to make the best of it in the slaughter houses. At the very least we should make English lessons free and easy to access. Not because I think we need to be an English only society, if I had my way we would follow the Canadian example and teach all children English and Spanish, but because English is useful in getting a better job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can sort of understand the desire to vote leave.   You don't have total control of your money, you don't have total control of immigration, you are financially married to Greece, Spain and other countries that aren't so healthy.   You turn on the news and see the craziness in France and Belgium..it's not a great picture and it gives ammo to right wing nazi race baiters.   On the other hand, if they lose Scotland, watch the pound fall to the point goods are too expensive, watch trade deals go south and so on then they will be sorry.   The EU was a good idea in theory but it forces every country to be on the hook for every other country.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry - what I meant was in some of these areas, a number of immigrants also voted to leave. So, as you said, it's more difficult and a lot of minorities in the UK have the same difficult choice. But people like Nigel Farage make it so much about race and overshadow the issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Well, I always pause when the right wingers are on any side I sympathize with, that's for damn sure.  I would hate to see the EU as a whole break up, since I see it as a stabilizing force. Anything that weakens Germany and keeps it yoked to the whole of Europe is something I'm in favor of,  but I see these sort of historical movements (including Trump *shudders*)  as so much bigger than myself.  What will be will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 Wonder what the Berniebros and #NeverHillary sect will think of this?  Uh, was that a low-key endorsement?  Actually on CBS this morning, Bernie double-talked his way out of formally endorsing HRC, though he claims the two camps are in dialogue. Whatevs.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In terms of Brexit, please remember that the vote was split along age and education factors.

  1. The older tended to vote to Leave, while the younger voted to Remain.
  2. The higher educated tended to vote to Remain, those with less formal education voted to Leave

 

Don't compare it to our Presidential elections, it's more akin to what happens in our Congressional elections where the older voters tend to hold sway as they show up in droves, more than younger people who tend to offer a more reliable turnout in Presidential but not Congressional elections.  The shock ascendancy of the Republicans takeover of the House in 2010 and then in 2014 tipping the balance in the Senate is a more apt example to compare to Brexit. 

 

Except in Brexit, the turnout was pretty good for the younger population but not enough to hold sway over the older voters.  Yes, the Leave campaign appealed to many xenophobes but I agree with @DRW50, that it was not just about anti-immigration, it was about fear of not having enough say vs. Brussels and Germany and it was about not trusting Cameron's words as he also represents the damaging effects of austerity, that he championed so thoroughly.

 

Scotland is reconsidering their place with Great Britain as we speak.  Part of the decision to stay with Great Britain was built on GB promoting their ties to the EU and the stability it offered for Scots.  With that being stripped away, I think the Scottish have good cause to have a 2nd look at that referendum and whether it holds water.  Scottish representatives and MPs are already contending that Scotland's future is with the EU.  

 

I think there will be a lot of unintended consequences as a result of this referendum that Cameron didn't truly need to call (it was a purely political gamble, which he lost), hence the resignation.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think that's the democrats problem. Democrats seem to grow more rapidly than republicans do in most voting elections in regards to growth. I think we've seen that through out the last two elections, the problem is largely that the democrats are so large that they end up fracturing at certain points and they have so many agenda's through their voting populace that it's hard to unite them all under one broad banner. Democrats are home to pretty much every minority and minority sympathize known in the country more or less. Republicans are the ones who alienate everyone who isn't a white male, basically. This will eventually end up killing their party if the can't transition to the 21st century sometime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy