Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yet another Trump commutation re-offends. Unsurprising, since in the final days of his presidency, he was doling out commutations and pardons to the highest bidders, instead of to those who had truly paid their debts to society and demonstrated their commitment to not re-offending.

After Trump commutation, Esformes arrested on domestic violence-related charges in Miami Beach

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Kamala Harris isn't just running against Donald Trump, she's getting inside his head.  THAT is how the game is played.

I am, too.  I'm waiting for that moment when he turns even on his own followers, and no one, not even the NYT, can bail him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with this quote but I'm more calm and resign to whatever happens. 

"My "gut instinct" for months has been a feeling that Harris is going to win, and win by a larger margin than Biden did in 2020. I just get the sense that Trump fatigue is real and that his support is somewhat softer this year than in 2020 or 2016. OTOH, I also keep having flashbacks to 2016 and just can't convince myself at all that she's actually going to win. And I won't feel confident until (or even if) she's actually declared the winner after the election. Usually I trust my instincts, but not this time, probably because of everything that is at stake if he wins."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what may have hurt (I'm aware we disagree on whether this hurt her campaign or not) is there was a gap where she did interviews, which allowed the media and Trump to paint her with the label of being afraid. Then when she did start doing more formal interviews, so much expectation was put onto them and Trump, with help from the press, was able to pick them apart and blunt any major positive comment (earlier today I saw that even 'entertainment' sites like Deadline were mentioning the edit in her interview on 60 Minutes). 

Meanwhile, Trump can dance at a rally and get praise from the NYT, can cancel an interview in a place like Squawk Box that should have been a layup for him, and the usual suspects run cover with a tiny caveat:

I think Harris should have either done major interviews immediately or stuck to a plan of avoiding major media and doing smaller outlets (ditto for Walz, who has just been cocooned to the point where the main time I hear about him beyond all the "knucklehead" stuff is ugly smears from grifters/bigots and a hateful impression from Jim Gaffigan on SNL). 

I saw a Politico interview with Bill Daley, who used to be Obama's chief of staff, saying it's Trump's race to lose, she is an underdog, she has to become better known because the campaign is so short. I assume given his ties to Obama a number of the people at the campaign feel this way and that's why this frantic push is happening after a lull, but I fear that the path taken may be the worst of both worlds and allows her moves to be spun as reactionary even if they are likely not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously we're listening to Bill Daley for advice. A guy who ran for how many offices and did not win one. He ran for mayor of Chicago basically as a republican, cozied up to the police union, and couldn't even make it to the runoff election, which was one black woman against another black woman. Daley is in fact a republican now and the Daleys have not been relevant for years. Just because he was chief of staff for exactly one year(there because of Rahm Emmanual). And while Obama gave Emmanuel his endorsement for mayor when he ran the first time, no where did he endorse Daley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there's a big difference between understandably worrying that something will go badly vs. accepting the pre-spin or pre-narrative from any right wing conservative or dead end leftist grifter as though those spin or narratives are actually taking flight among the general public, or having any serious impact.

If you listen to every dead-ender online be it on the far left or the right their personal mythology is that of course Harris is a weak candidate, of course she's losing because Gaza or whatever else, of course Walz is a joke. The reality is, none of this appears to be true or has borne out to be the case. Harris is still up in most polling, Gaza is just not a key issue for most of the Dem base in this election (vs. abortion, etc) and Walz is still overwhelmingly popular among the public according to actual numbers. I also don't get any indication that Harris' campaign is frantic in their current media push. I haven't heard that kind of talk anywhere, from anyone reputable online be it a journalist or anyone else.

Random people on social media are entitled to their opinions, they're not entitled to make me treat them all credibly or as a bellweather for the larger public. There's signal and then there's noise. I try to filter out noise.

It seems like this went well:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While some MSNBC people [Nicolle Wallace, Rachel Maddow] are unafraid to call a rotten orange spade a spade, whoever runs their social media accounts must still be trying to make diamonds out of crap.

Because its YT channel claims Trump turned a town hall into "an impromptu dance party", rather than state the obvious: Trump was losing what's left of his mind as his cult roasted.

If this were Biden, the media would do as it did all summer - question his age, call him unfit, and chip away until he stepped down, which is what happened.

But it's an NBC-affiliated station: Still all-in for Mr. Demented Fascist Apprentice, or so it seems!

Thank God almost everyone else that has witnessed last night's debacle are now sounding off, demanding his medical records, etc. Should have happened nine years ago, but what can you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy