Jump to content

AMC: Thursday, 11.06.08


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I sort of agree. I'm all for socially responsible storytelling but the veteran scene wasn't that. Agnes Nixon's strength was always mixing socially relevant storylines with traditional soap stories and that's why they worked. So when Ruth gave her famous speech it resonated with people because the war had hit close to someone that they already knew and loved. We don't know these veterans so to me, it sort of came out of nowhere. NOW, if Jake had been injured and was at the hosptal and you had real veterans mixed with a chararacter with ties to the show then THAT would have worked better I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sonya, I agree about Pratt. He is not the best writer in the world but he is capable of some great stuff. So much of the stuff he wrote on Santa Barbara in particular was brilliant. I know he is not the script writer on AMC, but I can remember some of his scripts on SB in 1985 and 1986 were brilliant. the same with some of his scripts on GH when he was a script writer there - that was in the early 80's.

I can remember many of the mags back in those days really bragging on him as a script writer.

He is sometimes a mixed bag on his HWing but I think overall so far he gets a high B from me at AMC. He really has stepped up and made the show enjoyable again for me.

Oh and BTW if the dialogue and stuff wasn't brilliant today (can't say I am watching it later tonight) it wouldn't be Pratt anyway. It would be whoever wrote the script that would not be capable. All that Pratt does is describe the episode. The breakdown writers do the step by step breakdown of how the eppy plays out and the script writer actually writers the episode. So if the dialogue and stuff wasn't that great it wouldn't be as much Pratt as the headwriter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SteveFrame says Sonya, I agree about Pratt. He is not the best writer in the world

=========================================

The bears are not the best writer in the world. :) Glad they are gone.

but he is capable of some great stuff.

========================

Yes he does!!!!

So much of the stuff he wrote on Santa Barbara in particular was brilliant. I know he is not the script writer on AMC, but I can remember some of his scripts on SB in 1985 and 1986 were brilliant. the same with some of his scripts on GH when he was a script writer there - that was in the early 80's.

==================================================

I never watched Santa Barbara but I did watch Melrose place and he was awesome! He was great on GH. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:mellow: Wow. I thought they were *amazing*--great job of editing too, I assume the actual discussion went on much longer but they did it in a way that it didn't feel drawn out or forced (like I thought some of the last time we saw something similar, the transgendered group, did--it wasn't handled nearly as well IMHO). Amazing stuff that really should make AMC and Agnes, and maybe even Pratt, proud.

I thought today was a great show, good mix of comedy and pathos (was that telenovela filmed just for the show?) and seriousness. Only the Emma kidnapping stuff felt a bit tacked on.

AMCGio said:

"I sort of agree. I'm all for socially responsible storytelling but the veteran scene wasn't that. Agnes Nixon's strength was always mixing socially relevant storylines with traditional soap stories and that's why they worked."

That's not completely true. I've read transcripts of the Oddysey House youth drug abuse stuff from OLTL in '70 or so and it was very very much exactly what this was. And obviouslyw ell done (especially for its time). I think the fact it didn't just ocme out of nowhere, but we've had months of this stuff casually written into stories thanks to Frankie and Taylor (specifically asking some of the Vets what their family thougth when they re-enlisted, etc) was what made it resonate.

Though the head writer has final say and many have been known to do the final edits and essentially write key scenes. I'm sure this is done less and less now, and Pratt strikes me as a pretty busy man but he does bear some responsibility for the daily writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never knew that about star trek but i use that a lot in situations like you said.

Looking at it stand alone i thought it was amazing and powerful and all that great stuff, but in the context of the show? idk. I found it rather boring. idk why.

and now i know why i didnt connect with the vet scenes. thank you for posting this, and i couldnt agree more.

I ahve not seen this happen to any character. I have seen Pratt adding layers and creating conflict and causing internal drama for long stale characters and couples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
    • Gone are the days where at least once every week, a character would pull a gun on someone (Ron you really turned gun violence into a joke on this show)
    • Oooooo I like these. I like we are on the same page about Little Brownie Man. And I hope to remember this at the end of June to see how much of it came to pass. I definitely feel that the Eva vs Kat story is about to reaaaally get going.    As for the B/C stories, it's funny you mentioned the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story first. Because out of all of those, it is the only one that has enough structure and build to it that it could keep going as a B story that could eventually climax. I think the only POV we don't have in it is Joey's at this point because Month 2 put in the work to give us Doug's and Vanessa's and they are now circling each other and their relationship. And we still need to know Joey's endgame.   Why we gotta pick on Jacob and Naomi? We need that goody good couple. lol. They talked about how they got together. Mind you, very briefly. But we do need to know a little bit more about both. Something I was hoping we were getting by having them in their own stories....him with the crooked cop, her with the lawsuit...but it didn't turn out as hoped. Hopefully, that won't be the case with June though.   Yeah, I want to see more of THAT Ashley.  I finally had to break down and explain to my manager why I keep laughing every time I see the bottle of Febreze at work. The product placement definitely be working.
    • I’m one of those people

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy