Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

There were reports a few days ago that she was considering not returning to Corrie because of the workload. Some used this to claim she thought the show was terrible now, and so on, but obviously there was more to it.

Deirdre was such an iconic part of Corrie. "Iconic" is overused now, but it fits her almost as well as those trademark huge glasses of Deirdre's best years did. I will always remember the shot of her in court, those glasses and that voice, weeping, "I didn't do it."

Deirdre was such a terrific character for such a long time - that voice cracking when she got upset or when she laughed too hard. The tears flooding her eyes at the latest drama in her life. "Oh, Ken." "Tracy luv." Her exasperation but adoration for her mother.

I always loved Deirdre most with Ray Langton - to me he was her soulmate, and the memories of her working as a secretary and trying her best to snap back and forth with Len, Ray and Jerry are among my favorites of any soap.

I'm so sorry for her loved ones and for the Corrie cast. I hope the industry will pay her the respect she deserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL re Daran Little, Bright Eyes. I wonder what happened for him to leave his beloved Coronation Street never to return. And then to end up writing for its primary rival EastEnders. I really did love his work on the BBC's Road To Coronation Street.

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read those books cover to cover (unfortunately I don't have them anymore). You can tell he gave them a harder time since he could do whatever he wanted with them, but they were very vivid creations, some of them with only a few brief descriptions. I especially like Ken's aunt, the showgirl.

I read them not long before that smiley hack Phil Collinson did the tram crash that some self-appointed Corrie purity brigades considered to be the ideal (they kept quiet when the whole thing amounted to nothing in less than a month). There was a section in the WWII book where a bomb attack did real damage to the Street. The women were just as involved as the men in trying to help. What were the women doing on Collinson's Corrie? Screaming and yelling and hissing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The tram crash is when I first tried to get into Corrie on a regular basis. I did not last very long.

Ivy Makepiece was a real witch. Killing her own mother, disowning her daughter and calling her a whore. So vile. Ralph the rapist son.

The thing is, with only the brief descriptions I imagine the plots hit a lot harder and tougher for me. Reading Jack Leeming's bio had my jaw on the floor in one line. "Jack returned to his old house in Victoria Street and resumed his sexual relationship with his younger sister Vicky." The end.

I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't seeing things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I remember, the incest part is just a brief mention, which probably makes it even worse.

Yes, Ivy was terrible, although I guess she got paid back in the end, as she died alone and unhappy.

You can read both books as they sort of go together, but they aren't closely linked. Overall I'd say the WWII one is better, as you get great characterizations for vital Corrie stars like Elsie - laughter and tears (like the best years of Corrie). I still remember the part where she goes to get an abortion.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just re-watching the Deirdre and Me special that originally aired in in 2012 when Anne celebrated her 40th anniversary on the show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TfTb2kwfbU

I think the Jon Lindsay stuff and subsequent prison sentence for Deirdre was the first Corrie storyline I remember reading about online and keeping up with in the late 90's.

The Ken/Deirdre/Mike triangle seems very inspired by American soaps. I know triangles had been done before on British soaps and they're certainly not unique to just soap operas, but something about the way that storyline was told from what I've seen of it feels more akin to American soap storytelling.

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy