Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The list is starting to get a bit too focused on modern characters, with Simon Barlow (who stopped working once they wrote him as too self-aware) at #35 and Sian Powers (!) at #33.

Sadly I am also not even sure about whether Carla should have been on the list. She was fantastic in 2008 but has not had any interesting storyline since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, Simon being on the list was enough to make me gasp, but then seeing Sian on there was enough to make me apathetic about the whole thing. Nothing against her, but how could she possibly measure up against characters like Jim, Liz, Sally, Kevin, Deirdre, and even Carla or David? She's been on for barely a year and a half and her only story has been sidelined like crazy.

I totally see Sean and Michelle running the Rovers, but the last episode I saw had Carla trying to talk Michelle into joining her in business. I decided to stop watching once Graeme woke up because...well, I don't need to see him without a shirt on and because I don't want to see him and Tina making baseless accusations against David. I liked that we were seeing Ashley a lot but knowing why really doesn't give me an incentive to watch for him. And where the hell are Rita, Norris, Mary, and Emily?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Poor Ken is at #30 in the poll :( Both he and Deirdre would have been better off with other partners, as they tend to stagnate each other and have for quite a few years.

Anyway, onto happier news...a Digest article from November 6, 1979. SOD Publishing Inc. Corrie is coming to the States! (which it did, repeatedly, over the next few decades, before finding something of a footing through torrents and Youtube).

10-30-2010105100PM.jpg

10-30-2010105100PM2.jpg

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, reading about when the show didn't have murderers and when it seemed more real -- now it's all random psychos, silly shock value stories, and stunts. I saw some interview with Ryan Thomas and the one who plays Cheryl the stripper and they were both almost yawning their way through the shocking moment that the tram crash is supposed to be. I miss that Corrie, it wasn't perfect by any means, but the characters were so strong then. The characters now just seem much more generic and poorly used. It seems like Collinson is moving the show in an even more generic direction by getting rid of people like Ashley and Claire.

I love the line from Doris Speed saying Americans will get used to the language, as British people did with Hollywood. She's right -- you get used to it fairly quickly.

Tony Jordan has talked to Collinson about making the show look less glossy, in how the sets or people are dressed. I wonder if that will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rare interview with Barbara Knox and Eileen Derbyshire. Eileen rarely talks to the press. I'm glad they are being honored. I'm especially glad for Eileen because she gets little notice for being in Corrie for nearly 50 years. Emily has always been a strong supporting presence, and when she gets the chance to lead a story, she is brilliant. Emily is the type of character so often sneered at by soap fans as "boring" or "dead wood." The time that these characters leave is when soaps lose all connection to reality.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rare interview with Barbara Knox. She explains why she's wearing that hat, talks about how she got on Corrie, and they show a clip I'd never seen before -- Rita's first scene. Oh how I miss Dennis.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love me some Barbara Knox. Such a fun, bubbly personality. She's almost like a slightly tamer Eileen Fulton, and geez, can you imagine those two working together?

It always makes me a little sad when UK soap vets kinda allude to how much the shows have changed. She's obviously still having a ball doing Corrie, but that face/tone when she talked about the increase in weekly episodes speaks a lot. Just like I want all US soaps to go back to 30 minutes, I wouldn't mind it if the UK soaps all went back to two episodes a week. Of course, it's always a question of whether TPTB would trim the shows in the right way.

That huge article on Corrie coming to the States is great! Doris Speed, bless her heart. I wonder how the show fared in those markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that charcter. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy