Jump to content

March 3-7, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

When RC was writing, the balance was shaked-up every month. He did it the right way.

What I want to know is what do you want OLTL fans want?? He is showing veterans. Todd, Nora, Viki, Clint, etc. Yes, he shows John. Yes, his stories are parenting stories. But he has only been here six months. Six months is not enough time to show all the stories you have planned. And he also had to clean up the mess that Dena made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thanks Ryan. I don't think it's the end of the world or OLTL is doomed to hell. For me, it's just boring right now. I suspect at some point, I'll go back. I do believe the very worst thing OLTL could do is change writers again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LMAO I'm sorry but AMC DESERVES these ratings. Guess viewers aren't interested in a bitch on a pole, or the sextet of suck(I know I'm sick of it). The writing is all over the place, one day characters say one thing, then next they say the complete opposite. Even Jesse & Angie are getting repetitive, and D&D can only carry that for so long....AMC is a true clusterfuck

AMC keeps mocking viewers and giving them giant FU's, guess viewers are biting back.

OLTL, just wow. I fear for that show. They seem stuck at 2.0, it's gonna be hard for them to get viewers back(ala Days) if this keeps up, same for AMC and GH.

How the HELL does Frons STILL have a job when ABC Daytime is literally bleeding from its core?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes there are vets on (and a lot of them), but the stories still don't make sense. Clint and Nora make no sense and it seems like the only reason they are together is to show a contrast to Bo and Lindsay, who also makes no sense. Ron is just using things that worked 10 years ago and making the characters act that way again. The food fight with those 4 vets made no sense and was stupid. Nora acts ridiculous and Lindsay should be held accountable for her actions. The ratings are just as bad now as they were under Ron. Ron has no idea how to do sweeps...nothing happened in November sweeps. He took over and we got Marice on the run with various wigs for WAY TOO LONG. If I NEVER see another character in a car again on this show it will be too soon, between Marcie (and her horrendous hysterics) and Tommy...Todd and John and my personal favorite Todd/Blair/John/Marty. These are all things that went down under Ron's watch, not Dena's and not the scabs. I understand he needs to fix things, but fix them, don't drag out crap because storylines "cannot be quickly ended." When you don't end crap that doesn't work, you end up with ratings of 2.0 (lows that were reached under Ron's tenure). I enjoy both Viki and Charlie and Jared and Natalie, but the uncle thing was way too much and again that is something Ron did. I don't blame him for what is playing out now, but the stories were bad before mid February...WTF wants to see Natalie pining for her uncle while he kissed her sister. And don't get me started on Marcie on the run. I use to enjoy Marcie, but now I NEVER want to see her again until she pays for her actions, which she doesn't seem to be doing. It was dragged out WAY too long. That story should have climaxed in November, not January. Ron is better then Dena, but he is by no means the great white hope that many make him out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have stopped blaming the headwriters for the rating fluctuations. What we are witnessing the cumulation of years of negligence on the part of the networks and producers combined with changing demographics of the soaps' viewership. I have noticed that once the ratings decline, there is no going back. Other than Y&R and B&B, the soaps are probably doomed to eventually disappear from network tv onto cable or the like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's even bad, when even the actors on AMC have NO idea what's going on with the storylines. Cameron Mathison said as much in a recent interview in SID. I guess he was told the amnesia storyline would go one way, but they ended up doing it another.

Just WOW, when actors have NO clue what's going on this show is in serious trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WOW! Some nasty/negative comments toward GL before the actual posting of the ratings. Let's see here.............

GL is #6 in total viewers (6. GL 2,745,000 (+3,000/+97,000)), they are the only soap to increase in the viewership from last week and they EVEN increased from last year.

GL is #6 in 18-49 Women Viewers (6. GL 856,000 (+21,000/+63,000)) with increased from last week and last week. They even beat AMC which ABC Soaps were supposed to be known for it's good demo ratings. They rank #4 in the 18-49 demo ratings (4. GL 1.3/8 (same/+.1)).

GL is is #1 in the Girls 12-17 Viewers (1. GL 65,000 (+18,000/+53,000)).

GL is the most diverse soap time slot-wise than any soaps on air since they air in many markets from 9am, 10am, 2pm and 3pm without any consistent time slot. The new production format was in full blast during this week so obviously marketing and sampling is taking place. Perhaps innovation and building on new, first time viewers for GL is the key to the future as all shows are competing with youtube, internet, and hundreds of cable channels.

Monday: 1.9/2,463,000 #7 out of 8

Tuesday: 2.0/2,755,000 #6 out of 8

Wednesday: 1.9/2,735,000 #6 out of 8 but very close behind DAYS

Thursday: 1.9/2,796,000 #6 out of 8 but very close behind GH

Friday: 2.1/2,978,000 #5 out of 8

If GL was in consistent time slot across the country like GH, I believe they would have higher ratings than GH and even their lead-in ATWT (no offense intended).

Yes, GL has problems but it's not a disaster as people constantly point out and I love watching this show through the good/bad times since 1989. GL in my opinion is severely underrated and they have only one way to go and that is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC also needs to fire the current promo monkeys and hire new ones cause they clearly don't know how to promote stuff people want to see.

We're STILL being subjected to Ryan's "one sexy man" promo on Soapnet, when the Ryan amensia stuff is clearly a flop, yet they keep promoting it. GH promoting more mob violence, the majority seem sick of the mob.

Seriously WTF is going on with this network????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How did I guess last week when Days was pretty boring it would go up? Seriously. Ratings have no rhyme or reason to them. Days will probably go down this week even though it's a bit better. Hopefully it can at least hold the 2.2 for this week.

This is a bad week for soaps though. I mean, I am shocked GH got nothing for the bridge stuff last week. I mean, the story sucked but usually for big events they get something. I feel bad for OLTL. Good for GL in viewers though.

ABC has major issues though. They are setting up to be the ratings story of 2008 much like Days was of 2007. Even if Days is up vs last year's lows, it still looks good when you see a plus there. I mean, they have gotten viewers back and CBS has too.

As for ATWT, why would all the publicity get them anything? Shock and awe doesn't work anymore. Just ask JER. That is all he did his last few years at Days and the past few years at Passions and the ratings did nothing despite any media attention the shows did get. The only recent "shock and awe" story that got media attention and did well was the SSK story on Days and that was for a short while. It all went downhill from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bad week for soaps. I was hoping ATWT would stay at 2.4. I had a feeling it would drop. The week was slow until the end of the week. I knew the pubilcity it was getting wouldnt raise the ratings. The positive is they are still at #3 in Total Viewers.

I cant believe GL is only .3 back from the number 3 spot in HH's. That is just awful. GL is the worst show in daytime right now.

OLTL is not all that. What is with all the praise it is getting. It deserves the ratings it is getting.

GH back at #3 in HH's....grrrrrrrrr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clint and Nora is something new instead of going back to the same old same old relationships. And Jerry Ver Dorn actually has chemistry with Hilary B. Smith(hell even Catherine Hickland).

I get what you are saying, but if Ron is taking things back to how they were in the 90's he is doing a good thing because that is what One Life to Live is. The 90's made its identity more than the seventies or eighties did, IMO. Ron has returned it to its identity that Dena deprived it of.

Ron is not the best HW, and yes the Marcie story was long, but it was long because it played a factor in many stories and if it had not been that long things wouldn't have gone in the great directions they did. Marcie was needed to get Viki and Gigi to Llanview, and if the hostage situation had happened in say November Viki would barely have had time to meet and bond with Charlie, much less be in Paris, Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You cannot always go home again. I am all for Ron writing stories that are similiar to the 90's for OLTL. But he isn't, he is just recycling old plots and putting the same people in them, even though they are no longer the same people anymore. Characters grow and evolve. Write compelling stories for who they are now, not who they use to be.

I disagree that you had to drag the Marcie stuff out because of Viki and Gigi...Ron CHOSE to tie those stories together. It makes no sense that Gigi had to come to town because Ramsey was trying to kill her and Shane. It was just as weak as some of the crap Dena has pulled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My god the smirking was back in full force today. He almost started smiling after Johnny mentioned he wouldn’t be there if EJ hadn’t raped Sami. I will say I did like seeing him with Dee as they’ve always had great chemistry.    They really are giving a lot of false hope with John getting better. I wish they hadn’t done that. Monday is going to be devastating. I really liked all the characters mixing and mingling today.  Nu-Rachel is still too sweet for me. Loved all the flashbacks. Everyone looked so young. Really enjoyed Brady’s scenes with John today.  
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 Loved her. I've never seen her Doctors work. 
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 I just loved Valerie on my early '90s TV shows. This one gets me. 
    • I assume they did at some point during the finale...
    • Kelly was a horribly-written character overall. Just think, two Emmy-winning actresses (including Cynthia Watros, Nina, GH, and Annie, GL) couldn't make it work. Pamela is campy, but so are Dani, Vanessa, Leslie, and Joey. And, I don't want to be too judgy because my love for camp changes depending on the show. OLTL, DAYS, and some eras of GH had me rolling with the camp. However, Passions was overkill and I hated it. And, here, I can take it or leave it. It's ok in small doses (note to RC). I see this show as more of a serious drama.
    • I think one of the reasons that pilot didn't get picked up was because Vicki L was associated more with being Thelma Harper and playing older then she was playing her own age.  It was a blessing it didn't get picked up, or we would have been deprived of the syndicated era of Mama's Family.   Also, worth noting a Pre Night Court Marsha Warfield and pre Perfect Strangers Rebecca Arthur in the cast.  All talented women, but stuck with a bad script. And the other pilot had a pre Fran Fine.. Fran Drescher as the best friend.  I think that pilot might have been picked up if Karen Valentine and Fran Drescher switched roles.
    • So, on rewatch....did Rick and Mindy never have sex? 
    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy