Jump to content

ATWT fans protest (Luke/Noah)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok my frustration with all of this is that the Nuke fans AND all the media are treating this like it's the first time a gay character or pairing has got the shaft. Seriously, do some research before writing articles. Because apparently I missed ALL the scenes where Bianca slept her way through town, making out with people right and left. Or when Lucas on GH kissed the whole football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

racism is alive and well in the queer community.

just look at gay soap queer as folk.

the same thing was done to a black gay character kissing a white gay character. the camera panned away when they kissed. where was the outcry for that?

yet when WHITE noah and WHITE luke don't kiss on atwt, it's homophobic and a campaign has to begin. talk about bias!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WORD BALLER! Where was the outcry when Bianca was turned into an asexual character on AMC?

The thing that pisses me off is the rabid Nuke fanbases asking for equality in the affection department. However, if they cared for the actual soap opera genre as whole, instead of their boring and horribly written couple (which is beside the point), they'd know that Luke and Noah haven't been written as couple with equality from the start. All the other "couples" on the show had a build-up to their relationship and somewhat of a gradual progression towards their relationship. Luke and Noah had neither, why weren't fans complaining that Luke "fell" in love with Noah like a day after meeting him? The were put together rather quickly, there was no real test of any chemistry existing between the two actors. Why can't some accept that a good part of the audience doesn't care for Luke and Noah, because they were a contrived pairing who the writer's decided to make as the "token gay relationship" on the show?

The Nuke fans are asking for a "realistic portrayal" of their couple, especially in regards to their physical relationship. But tell me, was it realistic that Luke fell for Noah 5 minutes after meeting him? Was it realistic that there was no significant build-up to their relationship? Hell no!

If I were to be protesting anything on gay relationships on soaps, I'd be protesting how horribly written and unrealistic they're written in general, not because they're not seen kissing or having sex, like the equally horribly written heterosexual couples on the show. I want a realistic portrayal of a gay relationship on a US soap more than anymore, but ATWT botched this story from the beginning and I will never forgive them for it or accept "Nuke" as a couple to care about.

Simply put, they writers made me not care for Nuke and I see ZERO chemistry between Hansis and Simbermann, and as I've stated many times, Silbermann is terribly stiff and wooden actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Double WORD!!! If Nuke fans want to pimp their couple--fine. As far as I'm concerned, Van and Jake are about as chemistry free as the average ATWT teen couple from the past ten years, which by my count includes hetero couplings like Bryant/Jen, Aaron/Lucy and Chris/Abigail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Have not posted in a while, but some of the stuff in this thread has me kind of fuming. Like all of the comments that Nuke fans only care about what happens to Nuke and could careless about the rest of the show, Well that is the biggest load of [!@#$%^&*] I have ever seen. Seeing as Nuke fans talk more about the whole show during it, then any site on the web, they have a live thread everyday that has about 500 posts in it, even on non-Nuke days, and they are always discussing what could be done to make certain storylines better in those threads. Also Most Nuke fans have taken place in any campaign for the actors that have left, so again this notion that Nuke fans only care about Nuke is a bunch of [!@#$%^&*].

Just because fans care enough about how there couple gets treated does not mean they don't care about the rest of the show.

One of the main reasons why Nuke fans don't post on boards like this and other's is because of comments like that, and the horrid bashing of the actors and the boring stuff, I mean why should they part take on other boards if that is all they get. At first lots of Nuke fans wanted to discuss them and other stuff on the show on the boards, but then they got bashed daily for liking the couple, so most of them stopped, I can't really blame them. Bad enough that Nuke fans have to deal with Bigots on main boards, but then they have to deal with people and there actor bashing posts and they are so boring crap. I mean they might not be the most interesting couple ever, but some people act like they are the worst thing to ever be on a soap, and they post like that to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Proof please (I never watched it). And if it did happen, why didn't you contact the NAACP?

There are enough people on this earth to deal with every cause possible. That doesn't make any one cause more worthy than another. If you passions lie in taking Queer as Folk to task, do it, but you're a little late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Definitely a worthy cause. So, where's your call to arms? Instead of taking it out on gay viewers, take it out on the PTB. The NUKE people are organized. Take a lesson from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That Queer As Folk stuff is 1000% made up! Brian kissed and had sex with more than blak guy. should they have had a black character on the show yes. No need to lie.

I also agree than the Nuke fans seem to forget about they much more beloved character of Bianca.

On more thing the N's number 2 show South Of Nowhere is being canned because of Lesbian and Bi character there's no big outcry.

Gay issues seem to trump Lesbian issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've yet to see anyone attack another poster here on SON simply because the poster might be a Nuke fan. Criticizing actors is apart of the game, deal with it. There's always going to be actors we like and those we're not too fond of. It's always up to the audience to decide and there's usually going to be mixed reactions in the end, but that's apart of posting on message board anyway - a variety of opinions. Jake Silbermann is not immune from that.

Marie Wilson, Scott Bryce, Roger Howarth, Jennifer Landon, and Jesse Soffer received much more criticism this past year than anyone involved in the Nuke pairing and that didn't stop their fans from posting here...

I don't blame Van and Jake for anything, it's the horrible writing and horrible casting for Noah that destroyed that couple almost before they started for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm more concerned that this has become a forum for which cause is more worthy than another. People pick and choose their own causes based on which excites more passion for justice, within them. Organizations have strict and clear mandates to appeal to those specific passions. I'm dismayed that people I once respected call gay rights issues a "piggyback" on other human rights issues. My husband, yes husband, because we are two men legally married, is black and gay. Can you imagine how conflicted he has been? he would say "when you are a racial minority, you generally come home to a family of the same minority, you never come home to a gay family"

Human rights are human rights. period. When one minority loses, we all lose. Clearly special interest groups need to exist. The different groups cannot get along for a common goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • ROFL.  priceless.   There are also countless mentions how wonderful Claire is, but I could not stomach watching a compilation of that!
    • The air...is looooooooooong gone.  
    • From what I remeber reading, it seemed as if it all completely falls apart post-Labine and Mayer around a year later when Ben is sent to prison around June 1976. Ben's departure undoes one of the major story threads that had carried the show for many months. Without a catalyst of Ben's ilk in the wings, there wasn't much to carry either story for the two women (Betsy and Arlene). Arlene was briefly paired in a one-sided attraction with Ray before becoming involved with Ian Russell. I believe the Schneiders introduced Ian as a suave businessman interested in Arlene who was also considering a dalliance with Meg. That would have been delightful but Upton arrives and quickly shifts the narrative to Arlene as a kept woman / prostitute (though I only think she was sleeping with Ian, but maybe I'm wrong).  I think it is Upton who transitioned Ben from complicated heel with a romantic appeal to a tortured, brooding romantic lead with a complicated past. I'm not sure that was the smartest move. Upton must have believed that Ben's near rape was his redemption arc, but I don't think it was enough. There is something deliciously wicked about Ben becoming involved with Mia after the death of Mia's stepson Jim Marriott, who had confessed his love for Mia before racing off on his motorbike and being hit by Ben's car. I could see the appeal, but I don't think it completely worked.  There should have been an angle involving Betsy (who had been a reporter I think when she first appeared) investigating Jim Marriott's accident, possibly with Jamie Rolins who was I believe district attorney. Betsy and Ben growing closer as Betsy grows closer to the truth. Ben confiding in Mia as Andrew continues to make Ben his surrogate son setting in motion the same dramatic situation with Andew's second wife being in love with his son/surrogate son.  I think Betsy and Jamie Rollins were together while Ben was in prison, but I don't think they had much to do. I may be wrong. Meg should have gone after custody making it seem like Jamie and/or Betsy were unfit leading to a case with social services which would have brought Diana Lamont back into the mix causing emotional angst for Diana as she works with Jamie to provide him the child she couldn't.  The Felicia / Eddie / Charles stuff seems rather generic once you get to Charles' paralysis and sexual dysfunction. Felicia's pregnancy and her death seemed to bring an end to a story that really wasn't strong enough to be frontburner. The Lynn Henderson stuff always seems rather movie of the week rather than developed for an ongoing story.  In the past, I agreed that it might have been possible that the story had become so disjointed that they needed to freshen up and add new story elements as Upton did but others have suggested that the elements themselves should have just been considered.   For example, I'm not a huge proponent of Rick and Cal as a couple, but I do think there was some mileage of actually reintroducing Barbara into the mix trying to reconnect with Hank, carrying a torch for Rick, causing conflict in the Sterlings marriage with Bruce and Van taking sides over Barbara vs. Cal, and Barbara maneuvering her way into the Beaver Ridge Complex making her business partners with Rick and Meg, which would give her a new rival.  When Ben returned, there should have been a question of how true his redemption was rather than just jumping in head first to a new role.  I think the Schneiders might have been script writers for Ann Marcus on "Search for Tomorrow," but I may be wrong on that.  Upton introduced the Marriotts in Janaury, 1977. Christian Marlowe's Andy Marriott seemed to be in the mold of Ben. I don't know if the story was any good, but I think Upton towards the end hinted an Andrew / Meg / Andy storyline which I thought would have been interesting. I think Upton had some interesting concepts, but from my understand, the execution was awful. 
    • Is there a new drinking game I don't know about?
    • But... the air of mystery and intrigue as they say it...
    • Chelsea wore this Episode #39, April 21, 2025, to watch the family karaoke. https://wornontv.net/508945/ https://shopafrm.com/products/shailene-dress-pink-petal

      Please register in order to view this content

      Preview of the upcoming May 10, 2025 Saturday Night Live: Régine Chassagne of "Arcade Fire" will wear the  same pink petal sheer mesh print but a top instead of a dress (Editorialist link) or (Nordstrom link) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHUNjOYjBOg screengrab of youtube:
    • I didn't wanna "ruin" it for you if Raven hadn't left on her midnight trip to London yet.  But based on where she's going -- and who she'll be staying with -- you can assume there will be some drama when she returns! I believe she even says to Logan or Eliot Dorn before she leaves, "My stepfather, Ansel Scott, always had a 'thing' for me!" lol.  
    • Introducing Genoa City's hottest story in Daytime: April and May are going to be a LONG edit lol. If there's enough demand I'll compile "Abbott Communications" as well.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Greg and Paige were an interesting choice for a couple.  I do think the lack of focusing on the generational differences hindered their long term potential. I think Laura had learned to keep her feelings close to her vest, especially after the hell she went through in her early years on the show.  The last scene of her trying to keep her tears inside as she drove away was the first time we had seen Laura really express what she was feeling after two or three seasons of her keeping her true self hidden from everyone.. even Greg.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy