Jump to content

Dallas: What Went Wrong?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I now have Seasons 3-8. I can now say something I couldn't say back then: Season 7 & 8, while good, do not hold a candle to the mini-series all the way through Season 4: The Battle For Ewing Oil.

Just wondering what others thought. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I was shocked at how much I enjoyed the later years actually. Cally was a GREAT addition to the cast and Cathy Podewell had amazing chemistry with Larry Hagman. She brought a sweet innocence to the show which was nice. Season 12 (or 13 on DVD) was absolutely sublime as well. I'm really excited about seeing that one again.

Many people hate the later years solely because of exits, but I can overlook that. By the time Pam and Sue Ellen left they were stale anyway. Hell, I would've written off Sue Ellen in season six or seven. I think it dumped her down to keep going back to JR and doing the same storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what happened to 'Dallas' is the same thing that happened to 'Dynasty'...The first half of the seasons were more 'serious' in their tone while the second half were sloppier and more over the top. I have to say that I think the merry go round storylines that Pam and Sue Ellen were involved in got repetitive. The same thing happened with 'Dynasty' after the Moldavian Royal Wedding, Alexis and Krystle and Blake just went on the same merry go round one too many times and the show became more tongue in cheek.

Granted, both shows were quite different, but the creative breakdowns were the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas and other primetime soaps faced the same problems -the shows had to revolve around the same characters.

Dallas always had to be about JR,Pam,Cliff etc -unlike daytime where the characters can be backburnered for a while.Also those characters got older and a new generation weren't there to take over.Having JR have a son was a plot that happened too late.Or Sue Ellen could have a had a daughter that she gave up years before.

The only younger character was Lucy and she was never given much to do.

Although there were only 30 eps a season,story moved faster and there were fewer stories and shorter scenes than daytime so a lot of story was eaten up.

I agree that Callie was a good addition(Whatever happened to the actress?) and that later seasons were entertaining,but the whole 'phenomena'was based around JR/Sue Ellen and Pam/Bobby and viewers lost interest along the way-especially the boring Anjelica years.

BTW Dynasty was never a patch on Dallas!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People always say the dream wrecked it for them, but personally I think it was the only thing Dallas could have done to rescue what had turned into an awful season. The season that followed, with Sue Ellen getting ballsy with JR and the B.D. Calhoun subplot, was one of the best seasons in the show's history.

I was a faithful fan to the end, but for me the turning point was Victoria Principal's departure. Bobby had great chemistry with Sheree J. Wilson, but it just felt like a big part of the original series had gone away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Dallas" started to get stale the season after Patrick Duffy returned. Once Victoria Principal left I actually thought the show was on an upswing again. I also liked April and as long as there were hints that Pam might return the whole show moved along nicely.

This fell flat and so did the last 2 seasons with the last being exceptionally painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victoria Principal's exit in 1987 was my first memory of a soap opera. My mom and dad watched Dallas for the longest time and I remember asking "why did Pam get into a car axident?" (Thinking that her car was axed and then blown up.) But hey I was 2!

I wish she should've returned because maybe she could've survived after all. You can't always believe what a character says and it's a soap opera, if Pam's husband could come back to life via a dream so could she.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TIIC were what happened to dallas, they made the show too male-dominanted and they wouldn't let sue ellen and pam do anything different other than be a drunk and be bobby's perfect wife. In the later year to try to draw in more male fans or whatever they were trying to do they bring on these blonde bimbos that couldn't be on sue ellen and pams level even on a good day. An alot storylines got ruined by the dream season, like donna/rays down syndrome storyline, sue ellen finally letting go of the bottle, and jr being a good husband/father. Its like the writers were there own worst enemy, they didn't have any creativity and when they did they messed it up.

I loved the seaon where sue ellen finally had jr's number, and thats why the showed jumped the shark for me, I wanted to see more but LG was gone. Jr pretty much got to do what he wanted with her gone, cally was just blah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy