Jump to content

Writer's Strike Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh, sweetheart, how new are you? I've been pissing people here off for a long time.

All this time I've been vibrating and no one's let me know! I clearly need better friends. Also, I wasn't aware I ever had a soap opera pilot. And I wouldn't have to do a parody if people would do their job and remove the obvious problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't have gotten off topic at all if the thread had not gotten derailed with more pleas for Kobe Beef in one's diet. It's disgusting enough to support scabs but to do so with such a shamelessly self-serving bent is really sad and indicates that one is not a friend to any real professional writers. I'd rather the least subtle self-promoter in the world keep its ravings to one unrelated thread instead of hijacking others; that's assuming, of course, that SON won't simply cut it off at the stump given its past behavior and violations. That's asking too much.

As for the topic itself, should I assume they're all still picketing down at Rockefeller today, or not until after the holiday? I meant to go over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they only picket during business hours on business days so I doubt they will picket on Monday since it is a Holiday. And I think they picket a different location every day. I believe yesterday, the only location they were at was News Corp. aka the parent company of Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's disgusting in anyway to support scabs considering only soaps will be using them. The things the WGA are fighting for won't really benefit soap writers, but they're the ones asked to suffer. I don't think that's fair, so I applaud even the worst scabs for keeping our soaps on air. Otherwise all these soap writers picketing won't have jobs to come home to! They need to be happy as well.

If the strike lasts six months or a year, do you honestly think these networks will air repeats? I wouldn't count on ANY repeats or for the viewers to be back. Kay Alden mentioned that Y&R lost 2 million viewers during OJ. Being gone for months (and returning with no promotion), I imagine the numbers would be higher today. We also have a booming cable business to contend with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 10 2007, 09:59 PM)
I don't think it's disgusting in anyway to support scabs considering only soaps will be using them. The things the WGA are fighting for won't really benefit soap writers, but they're the ones asked to suffer. I don't think that's fair, so I applaud even the worst scabs for keeping our soaps on air. Otherwise all these soap writers picketing won't have jobs to come home to! They need to.

As someone said several pages back - it's exactly about soap opera writers given that soaps will be distributed via internet and so forth... Look that reply up somewhere...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Three of the CBS soaps are on the net and it's already been said that in general they don't make money off internet airings yet. Certainly not for soaps. Whatever they get is going towards the budgets these shows have. I could see how that would be a concern for primetime with higher internet traffic, but not soaps.

In the end these writers will end up with checks for $5, if that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 10 2007, 02:59 PM)
I don't think it's disgusting in anyway to support scabs considering only soaps will be using them. The things the WGA are fighting for won't really benefit soap writers, but they're the ones asked to suffer. I don't think that's fair, so I applaud even the worst scabs for keeping our soaps on air. Otherwise all these soap writers picketing won't have jobs to come home to! They need to be happy as well.

A lot of these writers have already been threatened by network prexies to have their jobs taken by scabs. Look at what happened with AW in '88...Donna Swajeski and her team of fellow scabbies took jobs from Harding Lemay and some of the other people on that writing team. I'm not saying that Swajeski was a bad HW, in fact, I thought her AW(from what I saw of it on SOAPnet) was pretty great.

But soaps also lost viewers during the strike of '88 as well. Television saw a massive dropoff in viewers during OJ. And this past spring, TV lost lots of viewers thanks to Bush's New Eneregy Plan(rolling the clocks forward about three weeks early).

Regardless of whether there are reruns in daytime or news, or sports, the soaps are gonna lose viewers due to no fault of their own. But Y&R and B&B are at least holding onto their numbers while other soaps are freefalling because of bad writing or poor timeslots.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that in order for daytime to continue with new episodes and not be taken advantage of by greedy networks who want to play sports and Dateline pieces during the day, scabs have to be in place. But it doesn't mean that fans HAVE to support them or even appreciate them. Because we all know that the soaps will be in the same place, if not worse off than before, because of this strike.

The biggest difference between writing for a soap in '88 and writing for a soap in 2008 is the term "network interference." Be careful what you wish for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 10 2007, 03:13 PM)
In the end these writers will end up with checks for $5, if that.

That's dollar menu at Mickey D's for a struggling writer. And with ATWT and GL's budget woes, who's to say that they won't add six 0:30 spots in between acts of ATWT and GL and say..."Oh this is going towards the budget of the show" and pocket the money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He said it wouldn't benefit soap writers, not that it wasn't about them. Unlike successful primetime shows, soaps are generally losing money for the networks. Every penny they make from internet airings should be covering production costs, not going to the very writers responsible for their horrendous ratings. If networks and production companies are forced to cough up more to writers, that's another reason for them to cancel soaps altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What is the most recent episode in which Maurice Johnson's Ted wore a turtleneck?
    • They had a Liam/Hope montage today supposedly about all their times together but it was only Annika's Hope and no scenes from Kim Matula's Hope.  I realize they probably didn't want to restage those scenes with Annika. But still it was weird to omit the Italian wedding.  They could have thrown in a Puglia scenery pic without the actors.
    • I haven't watched today's episode yet, but maybe that was the point. Maybe they're trying to move Ted in a more unlikable/villain direction and it wouldn't work with the previous actor. Or maybe it's just that transition phase which will take some getting used to. 
    • Thanks to the benefits of watching the last weeks of Sherry's stint as Liza and the start of Louan's stint as Liza... I can safely say that Liza would have remained the lead heroine had Sherry stayed on as Liza.   Charisma is a mighty important element that makes someone watchable and likable... and Sherry had that. No disrepect for Louan because she was a good actress.. but to me, she played a more passive/neurotic Liza vs the more confident/decisive version of Liza.  I think the Liza vs Estelle over TR story would have had more impact with Sherry in the role..imho.
    • Welcome @SoapCurios it is nice to see new people here. Many episodes from The City still aren't available, but if I find any that touch on Azure's story, I will post them.
    • I'm not invested in Ted as a character anymore either. He's not the same.
    • I have a feeling it was either coincidence or it was an idea whose time had come. Remember Bill Bell was also into the psycho-sexual. So it was happening more than one place. Pete Lemay began disagreeing with Irna quite early on. He shut up & listened at first, naturally because he had to learn the basics. But, as soon as he had, they began to have arguments, disagreements. They both were devotees of character-driven but the similarities stopped pretty quickly. Bolin as far as AW was concerned was nuts & bolts, or more $$$. It was all about the numbers. And the numbers were great, double the ad revenue & that went to the network. As far HTSAM was concerned, that was her baby, no one else's. It is so funny to me that Lemay started this by accident.  
    • @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • What did you all think of Hogan/Patti compared to the stuff with Liza and Sonny? Did you buy anything about Sonny and Bela? Has a recast ever decentralized a character as much as Sherry's exit did with Liza? Or do you think that would have happened even if Sherry had stayed?
    •     I think the three comments pretty much summarize my thoughts. The green is not pleasant. I think I know where they were going with it, but it doesn't translate on screen.  The bar at Uptown is actually pretty good. It's my favorite part. I totally get it having an East Coast vibe. I used to frequent a place like it and while I wouldn't necessarily call it pretty...it was a bit Kitsch but it had a vibe. This place is lacking the vibe. I know it's not easy to hire extras, but even having a karaoke night in the background or live music would change the whole feel.  Vernon and Anita having breakfast there was a great idea. Another place besides the country club where they could talk. However, why were they using country club china at an establishment like Uptown. It just seems a bit confused. I don't understand what it's supposed to be. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy