Jump to content

TV Guide: Better Days Ahead


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

LOL, I just checked the production credits for Days at the Sony and NBC sites and they both have Edward Scott listed as Co-Executive Producer! I really find this funny because it took both sites like 6 months to change the head writer from JER to Hogan Sheffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Drake has had plenty of good material. The Brady story in 2000-2001, the JT/baby switch story in 2002, the Cassie/Rex/Tony stuff in 2002-2003, the SSK in 2003-2004, the drug addict story and story with Kate/Roman/Marlena in 2004-2005, and the Alex/amnesia story in 2005-2006 and he was wildly inconsistent throughout. He has only gotten worse as time has gone on. I still both of JER's stints messed him up because I remember he was so much better before JER arrived. He did good under JER's first run but after that run he went downhill and has only gotten worse IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a little bit off topic but kind of pertains to the casting part of the TV Guide story--I was watching IWBASS tonight, and the scene the actors were doing was a beach scene. Hogan made a comment to one of the actors that he had to not just look good without his shirt but concentrate on his acting--"something I have some experience with". The comment combined with the disdainful look on Hogan's face made me wonder if some of our shirtless hunks of this summer may find themselves written out/replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They weren't all bad. The Brady story was a re-write but gave J&M great angst. The baby switch and Gina/John stuff wasn't the best but, again, the material for him wasn't bad. The SSK story was wildly over the top yet, I guess that fits Drake's current acting style. It's his job as an actor to make the most of it and, a good deal of the time, he didn't. There have been many actors on Days that have not been given good material and they have rose above it and made something out of it.

Oh, and Days4Life, I saw that too. It made me wonder the same thing. I hope that is the case though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw firsthand Ed Scott directing the actors and giving them motivation. If he didn't see an actor putting forth some emotion/presence/subtext, he'd literally run from the booth and into the studio to give the actor better direction.

From this, along with his promises of better music, lack of cheesy effects, back to emotional-based stories... I think DAYS made a fantastic decision by putting this man in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me likes what I hear. :lol:

I think Ed will be a great influence on Days... he always struck me as a take no prisoners guy with Y&R, so if he applies that same approach to Days then the show should be just fine.

Now if you break up Shelle, I'll join the "Fire Ed Scott" fan club. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy