Jump to content

Y&R: Who Should Replace LML, When The Time Comes?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

B)-->

QUOTE(Chris B @ Jun 26 2007, 01:25 PM)
Latham has been in the ratings toilet since February, thats almost the entire year.

Depends on what February are you thinking of - if it's this year's February, it's hardly a year (much to my despair), if it's February last year, then it's not true. Which February are you talking about?

If only someone got rid of her...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Back on topic, I don't really care for someone to redo the 'Bill Bell vision' because there will NEVER be another William J. Bell. Not even his proteges, Smith and Alden, were overtly successful in maintaining what Bell did, so I have no faith in anyone else doing so. That sad, all I want is a head-writer who learns the history of the show and its characters, writes CHARACTER-DRIVEN STORIES, and overall good storylines. There was a point in time where Y&R was the only soap where you could find character-driven material, now the show is just like the other 8 plot-driven messes disguising themselves as "soaps".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And this were you are wrong but at least you share this view with the people at the Network.

Those viewers are gone as quick as they came at the slightest sight of their original favorite soap back in track or even if Y&R slightly disappoints them. Longtime viewers have much more patience which of course sometimes has an end as well....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe Ann works for the network. LOL. Wouldn't be the first time.

This is what many are forgetting...they think Y&R's gaining a new audience in disgruntled ABC/NBC fans is a good thing, but what they fail to realise is that the same audience that causes large increases and dips in the ratings is the same audience that is watching Y&R right now. The stablility and the assurance of Y&R's audience is being replaced by younger viewers who are soap-hoppers or that will watch for awhile. The new Y&R audience has no loyalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Understanding the network's thought process doesn't mean I necessarily share it, but I try to be realistic in my assessment of the situation. From the start on this thread, I stated quite clearly that I thought that LML is flawed. I said that she did has some good ideas, but there lots of flaws in her execution. I also noted all the things that thought that could be improved which is why I believe that she needs a consultant. If the ratings continued to decline and be erratic as they were under Alden and Smith, Y&R would be close to canceled by now. Also, I don't think that claim that Y&R is getting disgruntled ABC/NBC fans has any basis in fact. Where is the evidence of this? If it was true, Y&R would be up at least .3 points every week and that isn't happening. Y&R's fans, new, old and in between, are hanging in there for the time being. Until they leave, the network is not going to change course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think the show is perfect but I do think it's pretty good. And as I keep saying I'm enjoying it. I can hardly be the only one who is happy with what I'm seeing.

I don't believe Lynn is all-powerful nor do I think her work extends to every level of the show. I think there are others involved in the production, casting, etc. I think she's concentrating mainly on writing but of course having some say with other things. But I don't know this for a fact. I do however also believe she's being blamed for all kinds of things which other people have done.

I don't believe all the writing is being done by her and her alone, either. There are other people there consulting and coming up with stories. Lynn's husband, Josh Griffith & Scott Hamner are some of those people. Some of what's being blamed on Lynn is probably being cooked up by some of these other writers (and blame is a wrong word because I don't think there's all that much wrong with the show other than the Sheila fiasco.)

But I also believe the network & production companies are very much interested in changing the show in order for it to survive. Ratings are falling for all soaps in a downward spiral that's been going on for years.

It's finally hit those in charge that something has to be done to try to gain new viewers and keep a certain level of support for the shows. This will mean major changes.

I don't believe it's hit ABC because they're stuck in a bizarre time loop of idiocy. I've never seen such crap as has been going on over there.

But CBS & Days will probably be trying to fix, correct, and sustantially alter the shows to keep them going. ABC will probably keep going with the big bang shockers & the big boobs jiggling philosophy unless some heads roll.

In order to survive the shows are definitely going to have to make changes. They're going to have to grow up like the British shows. They have to find more daring & modern storytelling. The networks are going to have to hire writers who know what they're doing (Lynn has a long history writing and other examples like her might start showing up on daytime.)

And as I've said before the shows really have to cut the hour shows down to 1/2 hour. The bloating from the expansion is one of the major reasons for the sliding ratings. Most people just don't have time anymore to watch a show for 5 hours a week. People's lives get busier & busier all the time. Cutting the shows down would help the stories have higher quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The shows have been an hour for 30 years now so I don't buy that argument at all. I don't think cutting the shows back would help. Bringing in fresh, young new people to this genre would help. Storyline quality has nothing to do with the shows being an hour but everything to do with the vision less hacks that occupy the 9 HW positions in daytime currently. Sure Latham is not cooking up all this stuff on her own but as HW she takes responsibility for EVERYTHING that hits the screens because as HW she has final say on which direction the storyline will go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But don't you see what fans are saying? They are saying...stop this woman NOW before the viewers leave. Y&R has always had a reputation of changing course if something isn't working. If Latham stays any longer, there will be irreversible damage to not only the groundwork Bill Bell has laid out, but to the cast and the ratings as well.

Lynn Marie Lethal doesn't need a consultant. She NEEDS to get the fock out of the CBS Studios, guards posted at the door galore. And take her band of hacks with her.

Tell me about it!

You're happy, but at the expense of Y&R fans who miss seeing characters act like themselves. They miss the unpredictability of the storytelling, the romance, the intrigue, and for God's sake, they miss cohesive, intelligent dialogue!

Why do you not believe that? She is the Head Writer/Executive Producer! Executive Producer in Daytime oversees all areas of production on their own show. Her fingers are in every pie at Y&R, anyone can see that.

If that's what she calls "concentrating on writing," I'd hate to see her not concentrating on Y&R.

But I thought she mainly concentrated on writing?! If she is, then why are these people consulting and writing these terrible stories for her(like the murder of Carmen Mesta)?

And you would have to bring up the HAM. Christmas Dinner is on December 25!

But those major changes need not be at the expense of the audience who has made your show the #1 show for many years. We have seen what happens when a show alienates its core audience...poor AW(high on the heels of Jim Reilly's success at DAYS) was forced to dumb down stories, change its look, and spend money like water at the expense of cohesive storytelling. The numbers dwindled and every change in HW and EP following(including the idiocy of Charlotte Savitz) sank the numbers even lower, because NBC/PGP thought to gain viewers they needed "major changes." When, what was wrong with the show to begin with was the storytelling. AW began telling stories that its core audience couldn't relate to or follow and people left, affiliates in major cities began dropping the show, cast members were fired or left because of how horrible things became.

You'll be seeing the same thing at CBS if Lynn Marie Lethal stays on Y&R as Head-Writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Con't...

And Y&R doesn't do stunts and aesthetics? What do you call the Ice Storm, Drucilla and Sharon playing Cliffhangers minus Yodeling, Nick's Plane Crash? Not to mention the firing of Adrianne Leon for a "security-issue free" actress and Scamber with her titillating porn chats with Daniel? Like it or not, Y&R has become an ABC show trapped in a CBS show's body. Next thing you know, they'll take some frames out for the film look and every single set will be made of white walls.

Y&R is behaving like a man with a mid-life crisis. How do you expect Y&R(or any soap for that matter) to grow up? And, I'm all for intelligent, character driven storytelling, but I don't think US shows need to copy anything from another country.

That's scary. I remember a thread about six months ago listing who outside of daytime would make a terrific writer, and some on the list scared me, like one writer in particular who has a cult following. I have met said writer in person before and not only did he pooh-pooh the notion of soaps(even though his books read like something out of a cheap ABC soap episode), but the guy is extremely egotistical and relies on situations instead of characters to drive the stories. I've read exerpts from his books and I would be less-than-thrilled at his arrival to daytime.

We need people in daytime who care about soaps and care about writing for soaps, not people who are writing for soaps as "the last resort."

No, having people on the writing teams that actually understand and respect soaps would help stories have a higher quality. Cutting a show down to a half-hour isn't gonna make a damn bit of difference if you're being spoonfed crap from a dog's ass everyday. It just means less that you have to eat.

ETA: I'm not coming down on anyone or really picking on anyone who likes the current Y&R. These are just my thoughts of fans coming to the defense of a woman and her writing staff who are known hacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
    • I hope GH gives Lesley an on screen memorial I'd love to have Scott, Robert, Holly, Rose Kelly, Mike Webber, Blackie Parish  & Claudia Phillips return for the episodes
    • As requested by @BoldRestless the 1976 story summary of Y&R from the Daytime serial newsletter. I will post it in parts as it is quite detailed.  Pt 1 Set in Midwestern Genoa City, The Young and the  Restless, which premiered four years ago, is the story of the Brooks and Foster families. Jennifer and Stuart Brooks are, on the surface, the perfect couple, blessed with four beautiful daughters, but under the veneer of a first impression lie cracks in the facade. Jennifer had become dissatisfied with her marriage after the birth of her oldest daughter, Leslie, and had left Stuart with the idea of returning to her former fiancé, Dr. Bruce Henderson. After later reconciling with Stuart, Jennifer found she was pregnant with Laurie, and she has lived all these years with the suspicion that Laurie may be Bruce’s daughter. Leslie  has recovered from a nervous breakdown and is now a famous concert pianist, happily married to former Surgeon now newspaperman Brad Elliot.  . Chris Brooks is married to Dr. William (Snapper) Foster, and Peggy, the youngest Brooks daughter, is a college student. Jennifer recently left Stuart a second time, considering again a life with Bruce, but the discovery of a lump in her breast followed by a mastectomy for cancer has again changed her priorities.   Laurie, meanwhile, has been dating Dr. Mark Henderson, Bruce’s son.  Snapper’s mother, Liz Foster, had finally accepted the fact that her husband, Bill, had abandoned their family and had had him declared dead when he suddenly walked back into their lives, suffering from emphysema. Jill, Liz and Bill’s only daughter, was married to Phillip Chancellor, the father of her unborn child, just hours before his death. Phillip obtained a quick Caribbean divorce upon learning of his impending fatherhood and was badly injured when his now-ex-wife, Kay, meeting him at the airport upon his return, lost control of the car when he told her of his plans to marry Jill. After Phillip’s death Kay vowed to void his marriage to Jill and deprive Jill of |his estate. Kay’s son from her first marriage, Brock Reynolds, supports Jill in her claim, but Kay, a former alcoholic, cannot accept the idea of having lost Phillip to her former paid companion. Greg Foster, Jill and Snapper’s brother, is an attorney working for Legal Aid, where Chris is his assistant. Upon learning that her daughter Lauralee has become engaged to Dr. Bruce Henderson’s son Mark,Jennifer Brooks tells Mark she suspects he and.Laurie are half brother and sister. She explains she spent a week with Bruce after a bad fight with her husband, Stuart, when she believed their marriage was over. A blood test confirms her fears—Stuart cannot be Laurie’s father. Keeping what he’s learned to himself,Mark painfully breaks his engagement to Laurie and leaves town. Laurie is shattered by this, unable to understand what went wrong. But soon she begins to put bits and pieces together and confronts hermother, asking what she said to Mark that drove him away. Jennifer finally tells her daughter the truth and stands helplessly as Laurie turns to run to her father for comfort and suddenly realizes he’s not her father—even this her mother has taken from her. Laurie follows Mark to Cleveland and tries to persuade him that they can still be married—they need not have children—only to be hurt again when Mark sadly tells her their love would become dirty and they would wind up hating themselves and each other. Heart broken, Laurie agrees to let him go. Jennifer has recently left Stuart, due to growing frustration in her marriage, and had planned to marry Bruce, but discovery of breast cancer and a subsequent mastectomy caused her to reconsider her plans. When Stuart earnestly pleaded with her to come home to him and their daughters after her recovery, she agreed, but now her guilt over Laurie’s situation has caused her to waver. When Laurie confides the truth to her older sister Leslie, Les makes it clear to her mother that she finds the idea that Jennifer would think of returning to her father contemptible. But Brad Elliot,Leslie’s husband, warns her to hide her feelings or her father will notice and ask for an explanation.Jennifer gives in to Stuart’s wishes, and he welcomes her home as his wife again. Leslie has had two more piano-concert triumphs and basks in the attention of the music world, as well as that of Lance Prentiss, a wealthy industrialist who has been following her career with avid interest. Les invites Lance home to Genoa City, hoping the dynamic, handsome young titan of business can help distract Laurie from her heartbreak. With the birth of Jill Foster’s baby imminent, Kay Chancellor offers Jill one million dollars for the child —fathered by her late husband, Phillip Chancellor. After Phillip’s death Kay had the divorce ruled invalid and voided Jill’s marriage, making her unborn child illegitimate. But now, finally acknowledging Jill’s baby as Phillip’s, Kay tells Jill she can give the child the Chancellor name and social position, as well as the love she had for Phillip. Jill, torn by love for Phillip and his baby and the extreme financial need of her family (Jill’s father is dying of emphysema and needs a warm, dry climate), realizes that Kay can give her child everything he could need, things Jill could never provide, and agrees to Kay’s terms.  Jill’s son, Phillip Chancellor Foster, is born prematurely a few days later. Liz Foster, Jill’s mother, is horrified that Jill would “sell” her son to Kay, and Jill’s father, Bill, is horrified that it is concern for his health that led Jill to this arrangement. He would rather die than give up his grandson. But when Jill, who has avoided seeing her child, has to take physical custody of him in order to deliver him to Kay, she is suddenly unable to give him up.
    • tagging @Troppo who tracks B&B episode number anomalies -- see above posts.
    • Thanks!!

      Please register in order to view this content

        haha you did good explaining all that. So basically Monday's episode is gonna be what was suppose to be Friday's episode. Even though CBS and PPlus uploaded Monday's Aka Friday's show before they deleted it? LOL
    • I do mean those two, but when I download them, the Chris from Greece version is from RTL with subtitles and starts with a doctor greeting Stephanie and the rsclassicfanfanforever version is from Videoland, no subtitles and starts with Tawny and Becky? Sorry if this was already discussed. Is the Chris version merged with another episode? That one is longer.
    • B&B episode Episode #9521 (Season 38, Episode 162) was scheduled for Thurs. May 8. It was officially preempted, although some areas saw it, (Some areas saw the Steffy/Finn/Monaco rerun on May 8.) cbs.com and PPlus had 9521 (S38,E162) uploaded on May 8, despite it being preempted from that date, and they never took it down. B&B officially aired #9521 (S38, E162) on broadcast CBS television on Fri. May 9. B&B officially postponed the next episode #9522 (Season 38, Episode 163) to air on Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus had #9522 (S38, E163) uploaded Fri. May 9, despite it not airing yet on broadcast tv until Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus still had the early upload of 9522/S38,E163 available on their websites for about a day and a half, LOL,... (even though it doesn't air until May 12)... and then they finally removed it from their websites.   ALSO... at the same time as removing 9522/S38,E163 . . . .  cbs.com and PPlus fixed the website label for #9521 (S38, E162), which had displayed as "May 8" but now correctly says "May 9". --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Canada "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded #9521 (S38, E162) on Thurs. May 8, because they didn't realize at first that it was preempted in USA. Eventually ctv.ca Canada deleted the early upload of S38,E162. But then... "ctv.ca" Canada didn't re-upload #9521 (S38, 162), even after it aired in the USA officially on May 9. And apparently they were afraid to upload anything new, so for a couple of days, the most recent episode available  on ctv.ca was Wed. May 7,  #9520 (S38, E161). Finally  "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded *BOTH* of these: #9521 (S38, 162) (USA official airdate Fri. May 9)... And #9522 (S38, 163) (USA official airdate Mon. May 12)... listing it as as Monday May 12 and it's still on their website. --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Australia: "10play.com.au" fast-track Australia seemed to know what to do. They waited until 9521 aired in USA officially before uploading to their site. They haven't uploaded 9522 yet. (I don't have access to view Australia episodes, but I can see their menu. I kept checking their website multiple times over the past few days, and I saw the thumbnails and episode descriptions.)  ------------------- That was extremely confusing for me to type up. I probably made some errors. LOL.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy