Jump to content

Y&R Discussion: Week of April 30th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Eh, I don't know if that that was Dee point or not but to some extent I could agree with her.

First of all, MS is NOT directly responsible for any other cast member losing her job (although in case of VR sth. MUST have taken place behind the scenes à la the infamous Braeden/Bergman fistfight because those two hardly any scenes together out of a sudden...). If that was Dee's point, there totally lacks proof.

BUT Dee made me realize one thing: How has Phyllis - a character without any family backrgound on a show all about families - survived so long and gained such prominence in GC?

Simple answer: She's the last woman standing. Many characters were 'paired' over the years with Phyllis as her sparing partner and few did recover from it storyline-wise. The main victim was Diane Jenkins...

Lauralee Bell was also written into a corner at some point before she opted to leave. As for Patty Weaver and Tina Arnim (who played Sasha if I'm not mistaken) meanwhile were just plot devices for Phyllis (Sasha) or served hardly any purpose before Phyllis.

Victoria Rowell now opted to leave but Dru got burned by the power of Phyllis either way and it was uncertain where her story would have gone. We'll see where Sharon ends up in all of this because, say what you want, the reason why Eileen Davidson got less and less to do was the constant frontrunning role of Michelle Stafford. She has taken a place especially under the current regime of horror which often leaves little space for other female characters her age group. Is Stafford to blame? No.

Still, the writing of this regime reached the point where MS has been Bernard-ized - at least in my opinion. Phyllis is following the road of a very prominent mobster on an ABC daytime serial.

First: she was an underdog, but popular with fans. Then, she got some accolades in form of an Emmy. Needless to say, the role got bigger, much bigger. And now, the character is involved in the most storylines possible.

Too bad, that the shine of Michelle Stafford is glossing off exactly as it did on Maurice Bernard. I always considered her a fabulous talent and great actress. Now, I tend to believe that Phyllis - and the writing - were just made for. She simply fit perfectly, the role was fun&believable and therefore made a mark, also due to the help of her fellow cast member. But for the last 13 months or so Stafford has been a major disappointment for me. Her only good acting moments took place last December when Phyllis and Jack were trapped in the elevator. All the rest, was okay acting but not so rarely even sub-par performances - at least for a two-time Emmy-winner.

Was Stafford somehow stuck in unfavorable material? Yes. But she SHOULD have made more out of it. As actress who really deserves her two trophies she should have the ability to spin full circle. Unfortuntely, she has failed on some occasions which proves to me that Stafford is not as versatile as actress as I thought or wish she were. Great actresses make you like her even when you dislike her character...

Therefore; I think Dee's correct so far that a lot of talent in form of characters has been sacrificed to make room for Phyllis which worked in good times but is no more during less favourable periods. LML has like Guza on GH with Sonny ruined a once rightfully popular character and pushed her "star" into corner she seems often unable to get herself out with acting geniality...

EDIT: Oops, Dee posted at the same time as I did...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

MS is a GREAT actress and its NOT her fault that those other actress somehow ended up screwing themselves out of a job. Phyllis is a diva and crucial to Y&R. Its because of her (and the AWESOME rivalry between her and Diana Jenkins) that I even got interested in watching Y&R! Shes no saint and I don't think you'll ever hear anyone say she is. But she is a good person and beside Christine, Victoria, and Dru I really don't care about the other characters you say were "sacrificed" for Phyllis. As for being the victim Phyllis has not always been the victim. If you have a problem with her being a victim I suggest you turn your eyes to SHARON. That bitch has been playing that role for YEARS now and its quite pathetic. Phyllis cries like once in a blue moon. Sharon's been giving us waterworks off and on for several years now. Lets face facts here. I hate Ashley when I first watched Y&R cuz it seemed like she was obsessed with Victor and his magic stick. I didn't really care when Brad slept with Olivia. In fact I was disappointed when he got back with Ashley (this is when I liked Brad) And then Abby being Victors didn't help things. I agree whole heartedly that the character was a joke. Now shes an even bigger joke on B&B. Drucilla is a diva but she was psycho and for years has been putting her nose where it DOES NOT belong. Its fitting that the idiot died defending the, "helpless and weak" Saint Sharon.

Bottom line is that there is no way in hell you can pin all those exits on Michelle Stafford. I think this is just a result of hatred for the character. If not then fine. Either way I still don't agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you think MS has enough power to get someone in the Bell family written off the show then I think you are wrong about the amount of power she has. I just don't see how it's her fault that her character has staying power when other don't. If other characters had caught on with the audience the way she did they'd still be on the show, with the exception of the people who chose to leave.

I think what they said was stay in your place actress. They were under no obligation to let her write the show just because she wanted to. If they let another actor or actress do so then I'll agree there might be some bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't see how all those actresses leaving is on Michelle. I think your hatred for the character spills over and skews your view of the actress. No matter how you feel about Phyllis, you can't deny Michelle is one hell of an actress. It's not her fault if the women woking opposite of her aren't up to par. The only woman I saw that could truly hold her own and was on par with Michelle is Victoria Rowell.

As for characters playing the victim, look no farther than Sharon Abbott. For years, NOTHING has been her fault and that's something SC said she wanted to change because she wanted Sharon to take responsibility and get stronger, thus not playing the victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Phyllis? NOT crucial to Y&R. At all.

Phyllis cries ONCE IN A BLUE MOON.

Yeah, it's obvious you're a newbie. Which makes sense. :)

And ROFLMAO@dislikin Phyllis/MS is "hatin" on the character & "either way you don't agree".

That's nice. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This argument is pretty to the extent that of the current fornt-runners (Jack, Sharon, Brad, Fauxictoria, Nick, Phyllis) has been with Y&R for the shortest amount of time. Phyllis was written off the show once before and it survived without any slight bit of problem. No character on Y&R is that crucial for the whole - the current regime just tries to ABC the show with the likes of Phyllis (and admittedly others) taking the places like Sonny Corinthos, John McBain et all have gotten on their shows...

I can only repeat myself; to my understanding Dee did not blame MS per se - see my post above...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cricket was assasinated prior to her leavin.

Phyllis was allowed to TOTALLY rewrite history to make Cricket & Danny out to be nothin more than BIG MEANIES who stole Daniel from her while she was the poor pwecious wittle victim.

It IS her fault.

Especially since she's done inexplicably WORSE things than pretty much all of those characters combined & yet she's still on the show.

Yet when every other character is written off it's because they're "damaged" or "don't have staying power" :rolleyes:

Bull.

They are/were popular & were actresses with their own considerable fanbases but there's not enough room for them to logically be on the canvas with Phyllis The Parasite there.

No.

It was DEFINITELY "Stay In Your Place BLACK GIRL".

Cause there is absolutely NO WAY a WHITE actress of VR's stature would've been treated in that manner.

They sure weren't. But they sure do LOVE those ratings frontburner minority characters bring them.

Yet they can't afford to allow a minority to write for minority characters so they can give an fair representation how they act, speak, etc.

That's the thing, they already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe I'm a newbie but that doesn't mean anything. Phyllis to me is a very important character and a main reason why I love Y&R. I'm not saying shes the core of the show and that without her the show would be destroyed and ratings would plummet. Far from it. I'm just saying that for ME I like the show because Phyllis is on it. Just like I use to enjoy Drucilla.

On a side note I don't know where you're getting this whole race aspect thing from. I never heard anything about VR leaving because of race but I do concede that I don't really pay attention to these things. However I don't think MS is responsible for her exit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cause Phyllis can't logically remain on the show without any character growth, so other actresses & characters have to go so as to allow Phyllis to remain in the same rut she's been in since she slithered into town just shy of 15 years ago.

Not really. It's actually intertwined. Stafford is a good actress but she's been muggin for 4 years (at the very least) now. And current Phyllis is retroactively taintin MS for me.

She is. But given a combined degree of things it's not enough to make me drink the grape kool-aid.

LMAO. So now the women working opposite her "weren't up to par"?!

God, the excuses will NEVER cease.

AD was a great sparrin partner for her too. But that would mean TPTB would have to write Phyllis as a 40something & not a perennial "kewl" 30something like they so love to do.

Sharon is a HEROINE. That's the very definition of what a heroine is.

No.

"Playing the victim" & bein assertive are two totally different things.

SC wanted to be more assertive & move beyond bein stuck at the ranch.

The whole "playin the victim" thing didn't surface until she was thrown into Phyllis/MS orbit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Boy, that last scene was piss poor at best. Since she's a mother, I wish Amelia would have displayed the fear a pregnant woman fells when she has cramps. Ameila played it as Vicki just stubbed her toe, not a woman fearing she may loose her baby. BRING BACK HEATHER!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the reply and I just want to say that even though we may not agree about Phyllis I do enjoy talking about Y&R with you since its obvious you're a very passionate fan of the show and I really love interacting with true fans. Plus it does sadden me that VR isn't on the show anymore because even though Dru was psycho she still brought a lot of energy and spunk to the show. As a black man I also loved the diversity she brought to the show and her no nonsense down to earth diva talk. She really had some fabulous one liners and I hope they bring the character back in the future. It won't be too difficult since her "death" was so dumb/vague.

I can just see it now...Dru returns and shes ANGRY since Neil and everyone around her has moved on. She swears revenge and acts cold/distant to all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I simply do not agree that MS has that much influence or control over how Y&R is written or how other actresses are treated. If MS and Phyllis does have a crew or posse of rabid fans, then they have met their match in Sharon and Sharon Case and her posse. Sharon is defended and beloved on every soap board that I lurk on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy