-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Community Posts
-
I will say the first 7 years are fold especially in terms of production value. Much like Y&R there was a slight wuality slump between 1994-1997. Much like Y&R, 1998-2002 was pretty good IMO. I'd call it Bold's silver era. Brooke/Thorne/Macy, Brooke/Taylor/Ridge, Brooke/Deacon/Bridget and Sheila's '02 return are some good storylines from that era. From what I've watched on YT, more trashy and less sophisticated than the earlier days of B&B but it's silver compared to today's show. I still need to get into the Rick/Amber/Kimberly/Deacon mess to guve it a solid judgement. -
.thumb.png.a68c4f8da032398617aba05149c68a3f.png)
By Liberty City · Posted
Part of me can't help but wish Terry Lester had remained in the role of Mason to see a reunion between him and Eileen Davidson. It's clear TPTB wanted some of the Abbott magic in the Capwell family, and it did not strike with Davidson's Kelly. Garland just made the role her own and, when the Dobsons returned, they wanted an *older* Kelly, and once again proved they didn't always have the best ideas and concern for the soap they created. They did the same in the O.G. days of Santa Barbara. -
-
By Liberty City · Posted
Wow. What a beautiful end to the episode. At this point, they'd likely have to recast. I loved Matt Trudeau, too, but he's doing real estate outside of Los Angeles in Chicago. I just don't think there was ever any focus for Lucas, especially after being predominately in a marriage to Brad. -
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.