Jump to content

SOAPnet acquire the rights to.......


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I can't see Frons being able to out of Soapnet's contract with Sony. I don't think the person above him will tolerate him alienating Sony like that by getting rid of Days and Y&R.

Plus, if he acquires something else, I think Sonography and One day with ......will go next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Because Brian Frons worked at NBCD during SB's glory days and considered it his baby. It's a well known fact that Frons loved SB and the people who worked on it. Hell, 2 of the 3 current ABCD exec producers (Julie Hanan Carruthers and Jill Farren Phelps) he met while working with them on Santa Barbara. I don't blame Frons on this one. This goes higher than him IMO (Re: Disney Executives, who don't know the first thing about daytime)

That's so baseless though. Both The OC and One Tree Hill are extremely low-rated shows, hence why they were cancelled. Thing is they were cancelled.............yesterday! There's absolutely no demand for either show so what makes them think this is going to bring Soapnet viewers is beyond me.

Yes having AW is nice and it was gracious of them to give it back to us. But AW doesn't have nearly the cult following or demand that SB has built up in the past 14 years. People who didn't watch the first time around would kill to see it again- and those that did watch the first time around are salivating at the opportunity to do it all over again. When will they LISTEN damnit!

WE WANT SANTA BARBARA ON SOAPNET IN 2007!!!!!!!!!!!

:angry: :angry: :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to mention SB wasn't a low-rated show by today's standards. During their creative zenith (85-89), they pulled in anywhere from 3.5 to 5 million viewers, staying in the 4s & 5s during 87, 88, and some of 89. One Tree Hill & The OC averaged about 3 million viewers apiece this past season. Doesn't wash with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as I know One Tree Hill hasn't been cancelled (yet.)

I remember the press release when Another World got picked up by SoapNet. I was stunned the amount they paid was so high. But I don't remember the figure.

I don't think there's a chance SoapNet would want to dump either Sony soap. I believe they're bringing in the viewers.

SB had a lot of horrendous years after they removed the Dobsons and before they brought them back to fix the mess. No it wasn't as stinky as the past few years of GH but it was duller than dull much of that time and truly awful for a lot of it. Precious little of that middle time, which was a lot of years, is worth viewing. The beginning and a few other years of the run were excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But it was very low rated then. That's why the low ratings for the soaps today are upsetting the networks enough to be thinking of getting out of the soap business completely. Everything's a fraction of what they used to be which isn't worth it for the most part for them to keep things going this way.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if ABC doesn't have some exit strategy planned for SoapNet too, to transform it into another kind of cable channel eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a good move for SOAPnet, but very disappointing considering both shows are available on DVD and we want classic soaps. Still, Dallas has been running for years and could be removed for a daytime soap, plus they could cut 90210 down to one episode a day.

I just hope this does well so they get more money to add a daytime soap. Then again, who knows? Maybe they'll get Ugly Betty and more current soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, I have to defend Frons on this one. This might actually be a smart move. I guess the average SoapNET Viewer is 30+ and therefore those two shows with a rather enthusiast teenage following might allow SoapNET to get a new layer of audience which could get interested in the other programs of the cabler...

Of course past DAYTIME soaps would be well-received by us long-time fans but business-wise this seems to be good deal for SoapNET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking the same thing, but you know they'll just continue to re-run the series after it ends, like they do with the other shows.

OTH is in it's fourth year, with an avg of 22 eppys a year, so that's 88 eppys there and more or less the same for the OC, so they'll get a *good* 4/5 months for each *cycle*

and ETA: I would be shocked it the CW didn't pick up OTH for it's fifth season. The show has brought in some strong numbers in the last two seasons. I'm actually kinda glad that this show was picked up, I watched the first season and really liked it, just had way too much to do to ever continue and don't have the $ for the dvds. I always thought it was uber better than the OC.

and btw, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE the new banner....I miss Jax, and want him back soon~!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy