Jump to content

Positive News for Daytime Television


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No question.

The thing is like Kanewomen said, I can remember when I wanted to watch 3-4 soaps everyday (and I'd accomplish that on non-school days). Now I can barely watch one b/c they're just not that good anymore (as much as I hate to say that) genrally speaking, it's probably the same for a lot of 20-somethings these days. I still really hope it has a positive effect on the ratings for all these soaps, and this is def. some good news for the soaps finally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That basically sums up how I feel about it. When DVR started being counted, it didn't do a damn thing to help the ratings, so I don't know how this really will help, either. But that's not to say that I don't want it to, because I DO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think a few years ago this may have made a bigger difference than it will now, but unfortunately from what I have seen from revisiting my old campus soaps aren't as big as they used to be. In my old dorm during the day the TV in the lobby was always on a soap and so was the one in the student center.

I went there last month and the one in my old dorm was on ESPN on a Tuesday and the one in the student center was on MTV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They're late. I used to arrange my entire class and work schedule around Passions (and managed to have no Mondays and Fridays in the process). There was maybe one semester in my entire college career where I had class during Passions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS will benefit the most from the inclusion of college students. DAYS is VERY popular on campus here in Washington, everyone watches DAYS and schedules their afternoon classes around it (if they can).

All of my college friends watch DAYS and it is ALWAYS on in all the common rooms at all the dorms with MASSIVE groups watching it.

GH also has a pretty solid following, Y&R also has a following although smaller than GH's.

I would say that OLTL, GL & ATWT are the most unpopular on campas, I only know 1 person who watches ATWT and no one that watches GL/OLTL and that is ALOT of people.

PASSIONS has it is fanatical following and I have a couple friends that also catch B&B before DAYS comes on!

So I would say to look for DAYS to increase the most, followed by GH, then Y&R, then PSNS and then B&B with OLTL/ATWT/GL really not being affected at all (well at my school).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was my experience in the 90's, almost exactly. Sports and MTV. And I was so looking forward to stories I'd heard about the 70's and 80's when not only students but even some profs would get all comfy with coffee, sodas, and snacks for the soaps. Such a disappointment. For us it became a secret society and we'd hang out in different dorm rooms with tapes & VCRs. We even tried to start a Soaps Social Club but were told there had been one years before that was discontinued by way of faculty pressure. They never would have let us gather in the campus center anyway. So like the early Christians, we'd meet in secret at different places each time. When I moved to off-campus housing it usually ended up at my place. Half the time I couldn't be there because I had to work to afford the apartment but a few of my close friends had keys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just putting this into prospective. They are saying that the overall trend is a 3-5% increase for most shows, with Daytime soaps opera to get a slightly bigger increase (lets say 6-8% increase).

If the most popular soaps (DAYS, GH, Y&R) were to recieve an 8% increase this how their ratings would look based on what they recieved last week.

Y&R - 4.4 (last week) would move to 4.8 (with 8% increase) thats a gain of +.4 from the inclusion of college students

GH - 2.8 (last week) would move to 3.0 (with 8% increase) thats a gain of +.2 from the inclusion of college students

DAYS - 2.5 (last week) would move to 2.7 (with 8% increase) thats a gain of +.2 from the inclusion of college students

So looking at that, I would say because DAYS/GH are the most popular soaps by far on college campuses, I would say a .2 to .3 increase for them from this would be what we should see in the ratings. The other soaps should average anyways from 0 to increase of .2 in the ratings.

So nothing major, but on a good week for DAYS/GH we could be seeing them at the 2.9 to 3.0 range again with the inclusion of college students!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation.  I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy